Misplaced Pages

Talk:Informationsdienst gegen Rechtsextremismus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:54, 24 May 2006 editForeigner (talk | contribs)418 editsm New passage is a translation; sources see german article← Previous edit Revision as of 07:56, 24 May 2006 edit undoForeigner (talk | contribs)418 edits New passage is a translation; sources see german articleNext edit →
Line 29: Line 29:
:::We need them in this article, not in the German one. Please review our content policies. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 07:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC) :::We need them in this article, not in the German one. Please review our content policies. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 07:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


::::see the source by Claus Wolfschlag I've postet above ] 07:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC) ::::see the source by Claus Wolfschlag I've postet above. Please also note, ] is not just anybody but quite an important Person of the ] in the ] ] 07:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:56, 24 May 2006

IDGR frequently blamed to be Far-left

see the german article the english article is based on, have a look at the history , have a look at the discussion history (Yes, they realy do reverts on the discussion) too. IDGR claims to be anti-Fascist, its oponents say it is Ultra leftism. (Not my personal opinion, I do share none of them) Foreigner 15:56, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

New passage is a translation; sources see german article

pleases goto

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous#IDGR_needs_care_and_a_good_translator_german_-.3E_english

and, if you like compare it with the orgiginal lemma http://de.wikipedia.org/Informationsdienst_gegen_Rechtsextremismus

you are more than welcome to proof the history and the facts if u can read german, for sample http://de.wikipedia.org/Informationsdienst_gegen_Rechtsextremismus

of course, there's a little debate too, u can also find a plenty of sources there http://de.wikipedia.org/Diskussion:Informationsdienst_gegen_Rechtsextremismus

Wish you a lot of fun retracing the evolutionary history of the lemma. I haven't got the nerve for never ending debates with Slim about obviously evident facts, please see the history and discussion of David Icke and the "doubts" concerning ayahuasca. Will give you a better understanding bout slims "approach". Thanks for attention and goodbye. Foreigner 07:32, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Foreigner, if you want to edit the English Misplaced Pages, you have to edit in accordance with our policies. We need sources for any contentious edits. See WP:V and WP:NOR. SlimVirgin 07:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
The sources are all given. See above and proof it if you are able to read german. Foreigner
But, alas!, I'll give you a original source which is also quoted in the German Article, please see
in translation it means roughly speaking
Foreigner 07:52, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
We need them in this article, not in the German one. Please review our content policies. SlimVirgin 07:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
see the source by Claus Wolfschlag I've postet above. Please also note, Claus Wolfschlag is not just anybody but quite an important Person of the New Right in the Federal Republic of Germany Foreigner 07:53, 24 May 2006 (UTC)