Misplaced Pages

Bourke engine: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:07, 19 May 2006 edit68.100.47.194 (talk) External links← Previous edit Revision as of 17:13, 24 May 2006 edit undoZahid Abdassabur (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers3,957 edits Revert to revision 51893010 using popupsNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


== External links == == External links ==
*
Never mind the wannabe's! Come Visit The Original Bourke Engine Website!
First on the World Wide Web! Online since early 1998!
All other sites are kickoff copycats!
Get the straight scoop from the REAL Bourke Engine Com website!

http://www.bourke-engine.com
Download and read:
The Bourke Engine Documentary.
All About the Bourke Engine and how it works.
Bourke 30 cubic inch engine blueprints.
Bourke 400 Blueprints
And much more!

http://www.bourke-engine.com/ani.htm
See the animation of the original Bourke 400 cubic inch engine!

http://www.bourke-engine.com/VLB
See the solutions to the original Bourke engine problems!
Planned to be produced and sold to anyone who wants one!

http://www.projectbourke.com
Sign up to receive updates on our special projects.
You'll also be in line to purchase our new Fuel Econemy Device, The Fuel Cracker.
Recent tests have proven the Fuel Cracker will improve your gas milage by at least 15%!
Investor backed. Being made ready for mass production and sales the world over!


] ]

Revision as of 17:13, 24 May 2006

The Bourke engine was designed by Russell Bourke in the late 1930s, who endeavored to improve upon the Otto Cycle engine. Despite finishing his redesign and building several working engines; bad luck (WWII breaking out), bad health and a know-best attitude compounded to prevent his engine from ever coming to market despite its claimed advantages. Well into the 2000's there are several small groups extolling the virtues of the design. The Bourke engine has two opposed cylinders with the pistons in a Scotch yoke mechanism. Because the motion of the pistons is a perfect sine wave with regards to time vs displacement the fuel burns in a smaller volume, and so burns hotter. The Bourke engine also has a looser coupling with the output shaft, preventing excess vibration. The intake valves are replaced by ports, saving on parts.

Unfortunately the design features that increase its efficiency create emission problems. The higher combustion temperatures combined with the increased cycle time around top-dead-center lead to increased nitrogen oxide emissions. This more than anything else has stopped the Bourke engine from gaining wide spread acceptance today.

  • Design Points:
    1. Scotch yoke instead of connecting rods to translate motion to rotary motion.
      • Fewer moving parts.
      • Smoother operation.
      • Longer percentage of cycle spent at top-dead-center and bottom-dead-center for more complete combustion and exhaust scavanging.
    2. One power stroke per rotation (2-cycle) opposed to one every other rotation (4-cycle) resulting in nearly twice the power at a given engine speed.
    3. High compression and temperatures to cause an instantaneous and adiabatic reaction as opposed to a drawn out combustion.
    4. Lean fuel/air misture combined with the adiabatic reaction resulting in zero unburnt hydrocarbons in the exhaust.
    5. Sealed underside of the piston to isolate the fuel/air mixture from the crankcase.
      • Eliminate the need to mix oil with the fuel as with standard 2-cycle engines
      • Prevents the piston ring blow by from polluting the crankcase oil extending the life of the oil.

External links

Category: