Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
edit is done in such a way as to make it appear that human rights groups and various political entities have "questions of conflict of interest and and goverment pressure to produce a guilty verdict" Which is not the case, only the economist has rasied these questions. They also said Huq did not bow to this pressure. ] (]) 20:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
edit is done in such a way as to make it appear that human rights groups and various political entities have "questions of conflict of interest and and goverment pressure to produce a guilty verdict" Which is not the case, only the economist has raised these questions. They also said Huq did not bow to this pressure. ] (]) 20:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Revision as of 20:43, 9 April 2013
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
Attention!!! This article is on probation. Do not edit until you've read the notice below. Editors of this article are subject to the following restriction:
No editor may make more than one (1) revert on this article per twenty-four (24) hour period, excluding blatant vandalism and BLP violations. Editors who breach the restriction may be warned or blocked at the discretion of the enforcing admin.
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.
This edit
Not sure why you made this edit , Freemesm. The Shahbag protest started in reaction to Mollah's life sentence, so surely it makes much more sense to the narrative to mention them in conjunction with each other?
The other thing you did was switch back every instance of the word 'summary' in the reference name to 'summery'. Not that it really makes any difference, as only editors will see it, but the misspelling irritated me and I corrected it. The correct spelling of this word is 'summary'. Why did you put the wrong spelling in again? Applesandapples (talk) 01:53, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
Your edited part is emphasizing on his political identity. That seems very misleading to me. Main reason of this uprising is to demand the capital punishment for all war criminals. I repeat, for all war criminals. Not only Jamaati leaders.--Freemesm (talk) 15:33, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
First, I don't know where you get 'emphasizing' from. Mentioning that he is a Jamaat leader is really very standard, because that is simply who he is.
And with regards to war criminals, I don't think you're right about that. If you look at the history after all, it was the Pakistani army who were doing the vast majority of the massacring of Bengali civilians, and the Shahbag protest isn't concerned with them at all. Also, there were war criminals on the freedom fighter side, and the Shahbag protest isn't concerned with them either. Only those on trial at the ICT.
You can't suggest people for whose punishment they will come to road. Focusing on Pak army instead of Jamaat and repeated editing on jamaat leaders article indicates that you are politically motivated to bias these articles, rather than make these articles more descent. You are modifying these articles from fan point of view. That is not compatible with wiki policy Mr. apple lover! I was reverted all of your last edit, that's why your spelling correction was undone.--Freemesm (talk) 02:02, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Can you address the content we are discussing, rather than making absurd accusations. Why is it POV to mention that Mollah is a Jamaat leader? That's who he is. And there was a need to make clear that the Shahbag protest happened in reaction to his life sentence. Applesandapples (talk) 03:42, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Agree that political positions of indicted and convicted persons should be noted, as they are prominent leaders. I added the names of all the indicted suspects I could find, but am missing one or two of the Jamaat leaders.Parkwells (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Nuremberg model
The ICT law was drafted in 1973 by two German professors, and was modeled on the Nuremberg trials. This deserves to be mentioned in this article, in the face of all the controversy over international standards. Here's a reference, comments of the German ambassador in Bangladesh --ArmanJ (talk) 18:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
It would be useful to be more specific about what critics think is at odds with "international standards", as the 1973 law was amended, and some changes were made last June to the process (but I'm not sure what). It's all vague, but, if worth noting, should be made more clear.Parkwells (talk) 19:56, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Reaction - after events
It does not make sense to have comments from late 2012 and 2013 put as "Reception" before the trials and convictions. These were not done to satisfy outside polls anyway; am not sure why comments of state leaders were included. More to the point would be analysis as provided in some media, such as The Guardian and Independent, about possible outcomes, political risks, etc. to the process. Also, if criticism is to be included (as originally under "Reception", it needs to have specific details so that readers know the complaint - a vague comment about "fairness and transparency" doesn't say much - needing to "protect defense lawyers and witnesses from harassment" does.Parkwells (talk) 19:41, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
External links
It would be useful to have links to copies of the 1973 Act for the ICT, as well as the 2009 amendments, so readers could see what changes were made.Parkwells (talk) 20:05, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
Revert, why
This edit is done in such a way as to make it appear that human rights groups and various political entities have "questions of conflict of interest and and goverment pressure to produce a guilty verdict" Which is not the case, only the economist has raised these questions. They also said Huq did not bow to this pressure. Darkness Shines (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
