| Revision as of 15:33, 9 April 2013 editWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,111 edits rv Undid revision 549520187 by Guy Macon (talk)← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:40, 13 April 2013 edit undoDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,804 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I noticed you reverted my edits to ] could find no source for the exsistance of a single bladed turbine, even the linked article only mentons it in passing. As for the numbers %6 and %3, again there is no source, do you think you could find a source for both of these problems? Otherwise I don't beleve this material belongs on wikipeida. A place for this discussion might be . ] (]) 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | I noticed you reverted my edits to ] could find no source for the exsistance of a single bladed turbine, even the linked article only mentons it in passing. As for the numbers %6 and %3, again there is no source, do you think you could find a source for both of these problems? Otherwise I don't beleve this material belongs on wikipeida. A place for this discussion might be . ] (]) 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : Well, as you've noticed, single blade designs are not common. I haven't been working a lot on the wind power article lately but wehn I was, I recall that the discussion of blade count vs. efficiency was in line with what I was reading on the theory. --] (]) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | : Well, as you've noticed, single blade designs are not common. I haven't been working a lot on the wind power article lately but wehn I was, I recall that the discussion of blade count vs. efficiency was in line with what I was reading on the theory. --] (]) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for April 13== | |||
| Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to ]. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the ]{{*}} Join us at the ].</small> | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| :] (] | ]) | |||
| ::added a link pointing to ] | |||
| It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 14:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:40, 13 April 2013
This page has been edited. I noticed you reverted my edits to Wind_turbine_design here could find no source for the exsistance of a single bladed turbine, even the linked article only mentons it in passing. As for the numbers %6 and %3, again there is no source, do you think you could find a source for both of these problems? Otherwise I don't beleve this material belongs on wikipeida. A place for this discussion might be here. CombatWombat42 (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Well, as you've noticed, single blade designs are not common. I haven't been working a lot on the wind power article lately but wehn I was, I recall that the discussion of blade count vs. efficiency was in line with what I was reading on the theory. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:09, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Lagophthalmos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Keratopathy
- Phase-out of incandescent light bulbs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Metamerism
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)