Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Israel News Agency (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:18, 25 May 2006 editKarnei (talk | contribs)34 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 06:22, 25 May 2006 edit undoKarnei (talk | contribs)34 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 7: Line 7:
*'''Comment'''. Just for the record, with regard to issues discussed in the previous AfD, the Israel News Agency is not a government-controlled press agency in Israel, just a private entity, and it is not even the leading press agency in Israel -- that would be ] which Misplaced Pages doesn't yet have an article about. The Israel News Agency appears to be a relatively small operation although the Google News connection should be considered a point in its favor. --] 04:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment'''. Just for the record, with regard to issues discussed in the previous AfD, the Israel News Agency is not a government-controlled press agency in Israel, just a private entity, and it is not even the leading press agency in Israel -- that would be ] which Misplaced Pages doesn't yet have an article about. The Israel News Agency appears to be a relatively small operation although the Google News connection should be considered a point in its favor. --] 04:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Delete'''. &mdash;]<font color="green">]</font>] ] 23:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Delete'''. &mdash;]<font color="green">]</font>] ] 23:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Strong Keep''' If we are to judge notability by deeds, being the first Israeli government accredited source of news in 1995 speaks volumns. To judge by association the 100th of international media organizations and blogs using the Israel News Agencys materials is substantial. To judge by impact using Alexa.com and googleweb/news reaching millions world wide the INA appears more than notable on all three accounts.] 06:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Strong Keep''' If we are to judge notability by deeds, being the first Israeli government accredited source of news in 1995 speaks volumes. To judge by association the hundreds of international media organizations and blogs using the Israel News Agencys materials is substantial. To judge by impact using Alexa.com and Google web / Google news reaching millions world wide the INA appears more than notable on all three accounts.] 06:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:22, 25 May 2006

Israel News Agency

I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its deletion review. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at its first AfD nomination, and its deletion review. Ashenai 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Being listed on Google News is not very difficult and probably not enough to make something "notable" by our standards. The Alexa ranking is low and there are few unique Google hits. No reliable sources are presented for the information in the article. Currently it seems to me that the article doesn't qualify for inclusion, but I'm willing to be convinced if evidence to the contrary is presented. Haukur 21:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
  • How is notability being measured in this case? Are we applying WP:WEB, or another standard? Þorgeirsson states that getting listed on Google News is a rather trivial task; how does one accomplish this? For the moment, I am leaning toward keep due to its frequent citation by the press, but am open to discussion. Silensor 00:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, while it would have been better for another user to have been the initial author, that is not a requirement. Notability and NPOV are requirements. WP:WEB includes as criteria #3 "The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster." Google news is certainly well known and independent of the creator. I didn't find in my review proof that they were picked up by Google News, but this search for articles from them shows that they are picked up. 02:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. Just for the record, with regard to issues discussed in the previous AfD, the Israel News Agency is not a government-controlled press agency in Israel, just a private entity, and it is not even the leading press agency in Israel -- that would be Itim which Misplaced Pages doesn't yet have an article about. The Israel News Agency appears to be a relatively small operation although the Google News connection should be considered a point in its favor. --Metropolitan90 04:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. —Nightstallion (?) 23:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep If we are to judge notability by deeds, being the first Israeli government accredited source of news in 1995 speaks volumes. To judge by association the hundreds of international media organizations and blogs using the Israel News Agencys materials is substantial. To judge by impact using Alexa.com and Google web / Google news reaching millions world wide the INA appears more than notable on all three accounts.Karnei 06:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)