| Revision as of 02:41, 16 April 2013 editGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,287 edits →Talk:Power factor: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:15, 16 April 2013 edit undoWtshymanski (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users76,106 edits →Talk:Power factor: Protected. And on the wrong version, too.Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I would like to get the page protection lifted from ]. To do that, I am asking you to agree to not use reverts to insert your theory that there is no such thing as a negative power factor into that article without a consensus of the other editors that you are correct. You can just put the word "Agree" in the edit summary when you delete this (signifying that you agree to not insert your theory into the article; I am not asking you to agree that there is such a thing as a negative power factor) Your cooperation would be appreciated. --] (]) 02:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | I would like to get the page protection lifted from ]. To do that, I am asking you to agree to not use reverts to insert your theory that there is no such thing as a negative power factor into that article without a consensus of the other editors that you are correct. You can just put the word "Agree" in the edit summary when you delete this (signifying that you agree to not insert your theory into the article; I am not asking you to agree that there is such a thing as a negative power factor) Your cooperation would be appreciated. --] (]) 02:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
| : But I don't agree. I've explained this to death and no matter how many Fluke user manuals I see quoted, I object to the casual assertion that power factor runs from -1 to +1. My reasons are given in detail in the talk page discussion. Maybe Mr. McEchern will fix the IEEE standard this time to clarify this. --] (]) 13:15, 16 April 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:15, 16 April 2013
This page has been edited.
Talk:Power factor
I would like to get the page protection lifted from Power factor. To do that, I am asking you to agree to not use reverts to insert your theory that there is no such thing as a negative power factor into that article without a consensus of the other editors that you are correct. You can just put the word "Agree" in the edit summary when you delete this (signifying that you agree to not insert your theory into the article; I am not asking you to agree that there is such a thing as a negative power factor) Your cooperation would be appreciated. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
- But I don't agree. I've explained this to death and no matter how many Fluke user manuals I see quoted, I object to the casual assertion that power factor runs from -1 to +1. My reasons are given in detail in the talk page discussion. Maybe Mr. McEchern will fix the IEEE standard this time to clarify this. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:15, 16 April 2013 (UTC)