Revision as of 17:42, 25 May 2006 editHaukurth (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators26,987 edits →[]: Annotated one← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:50, 25 May 2006 edit undoBillC (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers19,841 edits DeleteNext edit → | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*'''Comment'''. The fact that Israel News Agency comes up ranked highly in Google searches might be more significant if its publisher were not a professional search engine optimizer. Also, I don't know whether Alexa.com is evidence of INA having significant impact, given that INA's Alexa rank is 251,401. --] 13:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''. The fact that Israel News Agency comes up ranked highly in Google searches might be more significant if its publisher were not a professional search engine optimizer. Also, I don't know whether Alexa.com is evidence of INA having significant impact, given that INA's Alexa rank is 251,401. --] 13:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
*'''Strong Keep''' From what I know about the Internet and Alexa.com "link density" that is the number of links linked to a site boosts its ranking. This translates into that the INA being a "popular" site. One can count the number of links to the INA and the quality of those sites which link to it, i.e. - CNN, Israel Min. Foreign Affairs ] 17:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC) <small>All of user's edits are on Joel Leyden related issues.</small> | *'''Strong Keep''' From what I know about the Internet and Alexa.com "link density" that is the number of links linked to a site boosts its ranking. This translates into that the INA being a "popular" site. One can count the number of links to the INA and the quality of those sites which link to it, i.e. - CNN, Israel Min. Foreign Affairs ] 17:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC) <small>All of user's edits are on Joel Leyden related issues.</small> | ||
*'''Delete''' per ]'s analysis of comparative Alexa rankings on ]. (I also draw people's attention to the following page: ].) --] 17:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:50, 25 May 2006
Israel News Agency
I have re-nominated this article as per the decision at its deletion review. Please do not count my nomination as a voice for or against the article's deletion. I am currently neutral on this issue. To understand the article's history, please refer to the discussions at its first AfD nomination, and its deletion review. Ashenai 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- Being listed on Google News is not very difficult and probably not enough to make something "notable" by our standards. The Alexa ranking is low and there are few unique Google hits. No reliable sources are presented for the information in the article. Currently it seems to me that the article doesn't qualify for inclusion, but I'm willing to be convinced if evidence to the contrary is presented. Haukur 21:55, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
- How is notability being measured in this case? Are we applying WP:WEB, or another standard? Þorgeirsson states that getting listed on Google News is a rather trivial task; how does one accomplish this? For the moment, I am leaning toward keep due to its frequent citation by the press, but am open to discussion. Silensor 00:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, while it would have been better for another user to have been the initial author, that is not a requirement. Notability and NPOV are requirements. WP:WEB includes as criteria #3 "The content is distributed via a site which is both well known and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster." Google news is certainly well known and independent of the creator. I didn't find in my review proof that they were picked up by Google News, but this search for articles from them shows that they are picked up. 02:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GRBerry (talk • contribs)
- Comment. Just for the record, with regard to issues discussed in the previous AfD, the Israel News Agency is not a government-controlled press agency in Israel, just a private entity, and it is not even the leading press agency in Israel -- that would be Itim which Misplaced Pages doesn't yet have an article about. The Israel News Agency appears to be a relatively small operation although the Google News connection should be considered a point in its favor. --Metropolitan90 04:22, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. —Nightstallion (?) 23:16, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep If we are to judge notability by deeds, being the first Israeli government accredited source of online news in 1995 speaks volumes. To judge by association the hundreds of international media organizations and blogs using the Israel News Agencys materials is substantial. To judge by impact using Alexa.com and Google web / Google news reaching millions world wide the INA appears more than notable on all three accounts.Karnei 06:18, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Comment:This is user's 6th edit to Misplaced Pages
- Keep as per above Bronxgirl 09:45, 25 May 2006 (UTC) Comment:This is user's first edit to Misplaced Pages
- Strong Keep Just performed a search for "Israel Gaza Terrorism", the INA comes up ranked number one Also comes up in top ten places for other Israeli related news items. May be a small operation but highly potent with a wide global audience. Potterseesall 11:51, 25 May 2006 (UTC)Comment:This is user's 11th edit to Misplaced Pages
- Comment. The fact that Israel News Agency comes up ranked highly in Google searches might be more significant if its publisher were not a professional search engine optimizer. Also, I don't know whether Alexa.com is evidence of INA having significant impact, given that INA's Alexa rank is 251,401. --Metropolitan90 13:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep From what I know about the Internet and Alexa.com "link density" that is the number of links linked to a site boosts its ranking. This translates into that the INA being a "popular" site. One can count the number of links to the INA and the quality of those sites which link to it, i.e. - CNN, Israel Min. Foreign Affairs Bonnieisrael 17:23, 25 May 2006 (UTC) All of user's edits are on Joel Leyden related issues.
- Delete per Haukurth's analysis of comparative Alexa rankings on Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Israel News Agency. (I also draw people's attention to the following page: Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Israelbeach.) --BillC 17:50, 25 May 2006 (UTC)