| Revision as of 21:43, 2 May 2013 editNuclearWarfare (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators83,664 edits →Franklin child prostitution ring allegations: no thank you← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:41, 2 May 2013 edit undoPetrarchan47 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,771 edits →Franklin child prostitution ring allegationsNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| ::::Hi Petrarchan47. I'm frankly not very interested in watching such a documentary, and including mention of a hacked-together Youtube version in the Misplaced Pages article about the Franklin case amounts to ] if there is no mention of it in an outside publication. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 21:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC) | ::::Hi Petrarchan47. I'm frankly not very interested in watching such a documentary, and including mention of a hacked-together Youtube version in the Misplaced Pages article about the Franklin case amounts to ] if there is no mention of it in an outside publication. '''<font color="navy">]</font>''' ''(<font color="green">]</font>)'' 21:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::: it is on another site. I haven't checked whether it is mentioned on Yorkshire Television's site or elsewhere. It is far from hacked together. It was made for the Discovery Channel and is well worth a watch for anyone working on that article. As for what can be added, it might take the "way back machine" to find a write-up in the TV Guide, but it's available (the link to the book tells how it can be done). This isn't my area of research, I thought perhaps someone working on the page would pick this up. BTW, I never mentioned adding the youtube video to the article. I asked if context might be missing given that this doc was pulled from US TV and there is proof of that. That isn't yet mentioned in the article. '''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px #B8B8B8;">]]]</span>''' 22:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:41, 2 May 2013
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
 Archives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Franklin child prostitution ring allegations
I see you're still watching the Franklin child prostitution ring allegations article...but it has been expanded significantly since you stubbed it out in October 2011. I haven't been watching it, but its part of a flame war going on between User:WLRoss and User:Phoenix and Winslow...I see third parties are mostly responsible for the expansion...is it still meeting BLP and other concerns?--MONGO 03:37, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- It wasn't really. I did some work on it; hopefully it's somewhat better now. NW (Talk) 04:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sure you've kept the worst referenced stuff out. No one is going to listen to a defrocked admin like me and since you took command of the article before, just thought I'd get your take on the situation.--MONGO 16:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi NW, I thought I would share that I lived in Omaha during this entire ordeal, and know people involved (Omaha is a small town, in many ways). It is with this context in mind that I suggest watching "Conspiracy of Silence", the result of a 10-month investigation by Yorkshire Television of England. It was scheduled to be aired on the Discovery Channel, but was pulled at the last minute. This fact is discussed here (I found this in a quick search, I have no idea about the book or author, but these facts are uncontested). With some digging, one could find the original TV Guide listing that shows this fact. I wonder if this would add some context to the article that may be missing? petrarchan47tc 21:24, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Petrarchan47. I'm frankly not very interested in watching such a documentary, and including mention of a hacked-together Youtube version in the Misplaced Pages article about the Franklin case amounts to original research if there is no mention of it in an outside publication. NW (Talk) 21:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- Here it is on another site. I haven't checked whether it is mentioned on Yorkshire Television's site or elsewhere. It is far from hacked together. It was made for the Discovery Channel and is well worth a watch for anyone working on that article. As for what can be added, it might take the "way back machine" to find a write-up in the TV Guide, but it's available (the link to the book tells how it can be done). This isn't my area of research, I thought perhaps someone working on the page would pick this up. BTW, I never mentioned adding the youtube video to the article. I asked if context might be missing given that this doc was pulled from US TV and there is proof of that. That isn't yet mentioned in the article. petrarchan47tc 22:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)