Misplaced Pages

:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Australian Roads Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:16, 6 May 2013 editNbound (talk | contribs)File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,028 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 09:16, 6 May 2013 edit undoEvad37 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators44,544 edits use level 2 and 3 headings instead of HTML codeNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{rfc|hist|prop}} {{rfc|hist|prop}}
==RfC: Conversion to {{tl|Infobox Road}}== '''RfC: Conversion to {{tl|Infobox Road}}'''


This proposal consists of several parts - This proposal consists of several parts -
Line 8: Line 8:
Please see ] (Wikiproject: Australian Roads) for a summary of what has been discussed so far. These topics are '''not''' closed for discussion, if you have a problem with an existing decision of Wikiproject: Australian Roads, please discuss it below, in addition to topics we may not have covered thus far. Please see ] (Wikiproject: Australian Roads) for a summary of what has been discussed so far. These topics are '''not''' closed for discussion, if you have a problem with an existing decision of Wikiproject: Australian Roads, please discuss it below, in addition to topics we may not have covered thus far.


===Survey=== ==Survey==
'''Survey is closed until issues have had adequate discussion.''' '''Survey is closed until issues have had adequate discussion.'''

<br>
⚫ ==Discussion==
<br>
⚫ ===Interested Parties===
<hr>
<br>
⚫ ===Discussion===
⚫ ====Interested Parties====
I have invited ], ], and ] on their associated talk pages. If anyone has suggestions for other interested parties to invite please let me know. Of course, individual editors can extend invitations to any groups or editors they want, but I am happy to accept requests to do it instead. - ] (]) 10:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC) I have invited ], ], and ] on their associated talk pages. If anyone has suggestions for other interested parties to invite please let me know. Of course, individual editors can extend invitations to any groups or editors they want, but I am happy to accept requests to do it instead. - ] (]) 10:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)


Line 33: Line 30:
] (]) 05:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC) ] (]) 05:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


====Your topic here==== ===Your topic here===
Text goes here... Text goes here...

<br>
⚫ ==Conversion testcases==
<br>
<hr>
<br>
⚫ ===Conversion testcases===
:''Main page: ] :''Main page: ]
If you would like a conversion of a particular road/highway/freeway, so you can see what it will look like, please request it below: If you would like a conversion of a particular road/highway/freeway, so you can see what it will look like, please request it below:

Revision as of 09:16, 6 May 2013

Please consider joining the feedback request service.
An editor has requested comments from other editors for this discussion. Within 24 hours, this page will be added to the following lists: When discussion has ended, remove this tag and it will be removed from the lists. If this page is on additional lists, they will be noted below.

RfC: Conversion to {{Infobox Road}}

This proposal consists of several parts -

  1. Identify all issues with {{Infobox Road}} and modify it for Australian usage. (Significant progress has already been made on this at WT:AURD)
  2. Convert articles using {{Infobox Australian road}} to {{Infobox Road}}, retaining {{Infobox Australian road}} as a backup working template if editors wish.

Please see WT:AURD (Wikiproject: Australian Roads) for a summary of what has been discussed so far. These topics are not closed for discussion, if you have a problem with an existing decision of Wikiproject: Australian Roads, please discuss it below, in addition to topics we may not have covered thus far.

Survey

Survey is closed until issues have had adequate discussion.

Discussion

Interested Parties

I have invited WP:AUS, WP:HWY, and WP:HWY/O on their associated talk pages. If anyone has suggestions for other interested parties to invite please let me know. Of course, individual editors can extend invitations to any groups or editors they want, but I am happy to accept requests to do it instead. - Nbound (talk) 10:37, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

For what has previously been a contentious topic, there seems little interest, so I have personally contacted the following editors individually:

  • All WP:HWY/O editors (with a few exceptions as certain editors helped discuss/propose this).
  • All WP:AUS editors in the "sorted list".

Or roughly 250 editors from those Wikiprojects.


As well as:

  • Editors who commented in previous discussions pertaining to the use of {{infobox road}} in Australian articles.

Or roughly 20 editors.


I apologize in advance for any double-ups/missing editors/other problems, I did my best to get the word out to as many people as possible.

Nbound (talk) 05:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Your topic here

Text goes here...

Conversion testcases

Main page: Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Australian Roads/Infobox testcases

If you would like a conversion of a particular road/highway/freeway, so you can see what it will look like, please request it below:

  • <Your request here>
  • <Your request here>

A reasonably complete set of Australia-specific {{infobox road}} documentation is also available at the bottom of the testcases page.

Category: