Misplaced Pages

Talk:Noncommutative Jordan algebra: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:08, 7 May 2013 editMaschen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users11,543 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:20, 7 May 2013 edit undoHyperbaric oxygen (talk | contribs)23 edits seems reasonable to meNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
| historical = | historical =
}} }}

==Noncommutative versus Not-necessarily commutative==
There is a perpetual problem with terms like non-commutative and non-associative, in that we usually intend to include objects that actually are commutative, associative, or whatever. There's another problem here in that ]s are commutative by definition, so that there is no such thing as a noncommutative Jordan algebra taken literally.

I would not expand the introduction beyond all reasonable limits so suggest some wording such as

:A noncommutative Jordan algebra is a generalisation of a Jordan algebra in which the condition of commutativity is replaced by a weaker condition. The definition includes Jordan algebras as a special case.

That still seems clumsy. Any better suggestions? ] (]) 15:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

==Defining axioms==
The definition in the 1955 paper of Schafer is not the same as that in the article. Schafer begins by defining a noncommutative Jordan algebra as satisfying the Jordan condition (1)
:<math> (x^2a)x = x^2(ax) </math>
together with the flexible condition (4)
:<math> (xa)x = x(ax) </math>
Indeed, Schafer notes that this is also the definition of Albert in 1948 (which Albert found unsatisfying!). Some discussion needs to be made about the equivalence of the definitions in the article and in the references: Schafer notes that under the assumption of (4) the condition (1) is equivalent to any of the conditions (5) of the article. ] (]) 15:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:20, 7 May 2013

WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Noncommutative versus Not-necessarily commutative

There is a perpetual problem with terms like non-commutative and non-associative, in that we usually intend to include objects that actually are commutative, associative, or whatever. There's another problem here in that Jordan algebras are commutative by definition, so that there is no such thing as a noncommutative Jordan algebra taken literally.

I would not expand the introduction beyond all reasonable limits so suggest some wording such as

A noncommutative Jordan algebra is a generalisation of a Jordan algebra in which the condition of commutativity is replaced by a weaker condition. The definition includes Jordan algebras as a special case.

That still seems clumsy. Any better suggestions? Hyperbaric oxygen (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Defining axioms

The definition in the 1955 paper of Schafer is not the same as that in the article. Schafer begins by defining a noncommutative Jordan algebra as satisfying the Jordan condition (1)

( x 2 a ) x = x 2 ( a x ) {\displaystyle (x^{2}a)x=x^{2}(ax)}

together with the flexible condition (4)

( x a ) x = x ( a x ) {\displaystyle (xa)x=x(ax)}

Indeed, Schafer notes that this is also the definition of Albert in 1948 (which Albert found unsatisfying!). Some discussion needs to be made about the equivalence of the definitions in the article and in the references: Schafer notes that under the assumption of (4) the condition (1) is equivalent to any of the conditions (5) of the article. Hyperbaric oxygen (talk) 15:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Categories: