| Revision as of 11:16, 28 April 2013 editMatthiaspaul (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors137,485 edits Undid 552550027 by Mike willaims (talk) Stop SPAMing. If you think the person is notable, WP:WTAF, but take care of WP:COI. Do not write about yourself or relatives.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:22, 13 May 2013 edit undoPalmbeachguy (talk | contribs)376 edits →CriticismNext edit → | ||
| Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
| PCWorld's tests of security software put Norton Internet Security 2009 in the 1st place.<ref>{{cite web|last=Larkin |first=Erik |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/158157/top_internet_security_suites_paying_for_protection.html |title=Top Internet Security Suites: Paying for Protection |publisher=PCWorld |date=2009-01-22 |accessdate=2012-10-04}}</ref> | PCWorld's tests of security software put Norton Internet Security 2009 in the 1st place.<ref>{{cite web|last=Larkin |first=Erik |url=http://www.pcworld.com/article/158157/top_internet_security_suites_paying_for_protection.html |title=Top Internet Security Suites: Paying for Protection |publisher=PCWorld |date=2009-01-22 |accessdate=2012-10-04}}</ref> | ||
| In 2011's test of PCWorld Norton Internet Security was the winner.{{Citation needed|date=June 2012}} Dennis Technology Labs (in tests sponsored by Symantec) confirms the performance and effectiveness of Norton 2011 and 2012 lines.<ref>Dennis Technology Labs (26 January 2011), , retrieved 4 October 2012</ref> | In 2011's test of PCWorld Norton Internet Security was the winner.{{Citation needed|date=June 2012}} Dennis Technology Labs (in tests sponsored by Symantec) confirms the performance and effectiveness of Norton 2011 and 2012 lines.<ref>Dennis Technology Labs (26 January 2011), , retrieved 4 October 2012</ref> | ||
| == Criticism == | |||
| ===FBI cooperation=== | |||
| The ] confirmed the active development of ], a ] intended to obtain passwords to encrypted e-mail and other documents during criminal investigations. Magic Lantern was first reported in the media by ] of ] on 20 November 2001 and by Ted Bridis of the ].<ref>{{cite news |url = http://msnbc.com/news/660096.asp?cp1=1 | title = FBI software cracks encryption wall | first = Bob | last = Sullivan | publisher = ] | date = 2001-11-20 | accessdate = 2007-11-20 }} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref><ref>Ted Bridis. "FBI Develops Eavesdropping Tools," '']'', November 22, 2001.</ref> The FBI intends to deploy Magic Lantern in the form of an ]. When the attachment is opened, it installs a ] on the suspect's computer, which is activated when the suspect uses ] encryption, often used to increase the security of sent e-mail messages. When activated, the trojan will log the PGP password, which allows the FBI to decrypt user communications.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://usgovinfo.about.com/library/weekly/aa121401a.htm |title=FBI Has a Magic Lantern |publisher=Usgovinfo.about.com |date= |accessdate=2009-02-23}}</ref> Symantec and other major antivirus vendors have ]ed the Magic Lantern trojan, rendering their antivirus products, including Norton AntiVirus, incapable of detecting it. Concerns around this whitelisting include uncertainties about Magic Lantern's full surveillance potential and whether hackers could subvert it and redeploy it for purposes outside of law enforcement.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://utopia.csis.pace.edu/dps/2007/jkile/2005%20-%20Spring/DCS823/Spyware/01016895.pdf |title=Invasive Software: Who's Inside Your Computer? |accessdate=2009-03-12 |work=George Lawton |publisher= |date=July 2002}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|author=http://www.kaspersky.com |url=http://www.kaspersky.com/news?id=266 |title=The FBI's "Magic Lantern" Shines Bright |publisher=Kaspersky.com |date=2001-12-11 |accessdate=2009-02-23}}</ref> | |||
| Graham Cluley, a technology consultant from ], said "We have no way of knowing if it was written by the FBI, and even if we did, we wouldn’t know whether it was being used by the FBI or if it had been commandeered by a third party".<ref>{{cite web|last=Jackson |first=William |url=http://www.gcn.com/online/vol1_no1/17572-1.html |title=Antivirus vendors are wary of FBI's Magic Lantern – Government Computer News |publisher=Gcn.com |date=2001-12-06 |accessdate=2009-02-23}}</ref> Another reaction came from Marc Maiffret, chief technology officer and cofounder of ] who states: "Our customers are paying us for a service, to protect them from all forms of malicious code. It is not up to us to do law enforcement's job for them so we do not, and will not, make any exceptions for law enforcement malware or other tools."<ref>{{cite web|last=McCullagh |first=Declan |url=http://news.cnet.com/2100-7348-6197020.html?tag=tb |title=Will security firms detect police spyware? – CNET News |publisher=CBS Interactive, Inc |date=2007-07-17 |accessdate=2009-02-23}}</ref> | |||
| Proponents of Magic Lantern argue the technology would allow law enforcement to efficiently and quickly decrypt time-sensitive messages protected by encryption schemes. Implementing Magic Lantern does not require physical access to a suspect's computer, unlike ], a predecessor to Magic Lantern, since physical access to a computer would require a court order.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/other/Etzioni.doc |title=IMPLICATIONS OF SELECT NEW TECHNOLOGIES FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND PUBLIC SAFETY |accessdate=2009-03-12 |work=Amitai Etzioni |publisher=Harvard Journal of Law & Technology|year=2002 }} {{Dead link|date=September 2010|bot=H3llBot}}</ref> FBI spokesman Paul Bresson, in response to a question about whether Magic Lantern also needed a court order to deploy, would only say "Like all technology projects or tools deployed by the FBI it would be used pursuant to the appropriate legal process."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.si.umich.edu/~rfrost/courses/SI110/readings/Privacy/Magic_Lantern.pdf |title=FBI Confirms ‘Magic Lantern’ Project Exists|accessdate=2009-03-12 |work=Elinor Mills Abreu |publisher=At Home Corporation |date=December 31, 2001 }}{{dead link|date=October 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/articles/pdf/v15/15HarvJLTech521.pdf |title=THE CASE FOR MAGIC LANTERN: SEPTEMBER 11 HIGHLIGHTS THE NEED FOR INCREASED SURVEILLANCE |accessdate=2009-03-12 |work=Christopher Woo & Miranda So |publisher=Harvard Journal of Law & Technology |year=2002}}</ref> | |||
| ===Update disables legitimate software=== | |||
| On January 28, 2010 ] Anti-virus update marked ] as a ] disabling the software across millions of PCs.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://aka-community.symantec.com/connect/forums/spotify-detected-trojan-horse |title=Spotify is detected as an Trojan Horse? | Symantec Connect Community |publisher=Aka-community.symantec.com |date= |accessdate=2012-10-04}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://getsatisfaction.com/spotify/topics/spotify_defined_as_a_trojan_by_symantec |title=Spotify defined as a trojan by Symantec |publisher=Getsatisfaction.com |date= |accessdate=2012-10-04}}</ref> | |||
| === Product support === | |||
| Retail customers report slow and indifferent service on bugs. Examples include a faulty error message stating current subscriptions had expired.<ref name=bug>{{cite web | title=Error: "Your virus protection cannot be updated" when running the Intelligent Updater | url=http://service1.symantec.com/Support/sharedtech.nsf/docid/2000120709403806?Open&src=con_ols_nam | work= | publisher=Symantec Corporation | date=July 27, 2007 | accessdate=2009-05-27}}</ref> Users received an error stating "Your virus protection cannot be updated." This error occurred after an update to the software and refused to allow daily updates.<ref name="bug" /> Though the bug was reported in 2004, it was not corrected for the 2005 or 2006 versions. | |||
| Another incident occurred in May 2007, when Norton AntiVirus flagged components of the ] ] client as malicious, rendering the program corrupted.<ref>{{cite web | title=Pegasus Email Client Being Flagged as a Trojan Program | url=http://www.tnpcnewsletter.com/blog/2007/05/18/pegasus-email-client-being-flagged-as-a-trojan-program/ | work=DanB | publisher=TNPC Newsletter | date=May 18, 2007 | accessdate=2009-05-27}}</ref> Symantec customer service addressed the problem by running through a checklist of troubleshooting steps which were not always successful. | |||
| === Faulty update === | |||
| On July 25, 2006, Symantec released a faulty update for ] users. Users reported an onscreen message stating "Norton AntiVirus 2006 does not support the repair feature. Please uninstall and reinstall.".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/07/screwy_update_confuses_norton.html |title=Faulty Update Stymies Norton Users |accessdate=2009-02-26 |work= |publisher=The Washington Post Company |year=2009 }}</ref> Symantec claimed the faulty update was downloaded to customers between 1:00 PM and 7:00 PM on July 25, 2006. Symantec developed a workaround tool and has listed troubleshooting steps, . The company released a statement, stating they expected to deliver a repair patch to affected users by Monday, July 31, 2006." <ref name = "CNET-alphablog">{{cite web|last=Vamosi |first=Robert |url=http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6623474.html |title=Symantec ships faulty Norton AntiVirus 2006 update – Alpha Blog – alpha.cnet.com |publisher=Reviews.cnet.com |date=2006-07-31 |accessdate=2010-11-09}}</ref> | |||
| ===Uninstallation=== | |||
| {{Infobox Software | |||
| | name = Norton Removal Tool | |||
| | screenshot=] | |||
| | caption = Norton Removal Tool | |||
| | developer = ] | |||
| | latest release version = 2012.0.0.19 | |||
| | operating_system = ] | |||
| | website = | |||
| }} | |||
| Norton AntiVirus has been criticized for refusing to ] completely, leaving unnecessary files behind.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://windowssecrets.com/2008/02/07/01-Symantec-uninstaller-may-not-finish-the-job |title=Symantec uninstaller may not finish the job |accessdate=2009-03-05 |work=Scott Dunn |publisher=WindowsSecrets.com |date=February 7, 2008 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.askdavetaylor.com/how_can_i_fully_remove_norton_antivirus_from_my_system.html |title=How can I fully remove Norton Antivirus from my system? |publisher=Dave Taylor |date= |accessdate=2009-02-23}}</ref> Another issue is versions prior to 2009 installed ], which updates Norton-branded software, separately. The user must uninstall both Norton AntiVirus and the LiveUpdate component manually. The LiveUpdate component is purposely left behind to update other Norton-branded products, if present.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.pcworld.com/reviews/product/30828/review/norton_internet_security_2008.html |title=PCWorld |publisher=PCWorld |date= |accessdate=2009-02-23}}</ref> In response, Symantec developed the ] (SymNRT) to remove leftover ] keys and values along with files and folders.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/tsgeninfo.nsf/docid/2005033108162039 |title=Download and run the Norton Removal Tool |publisher=Symantec Corporation |date= |accessdate=2009-02-23}}</ref> However, neither route of uninstallation will remove subscription data, preserved to prevent users from installing multiple trial copies.{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}}<br> | |||
| SymNRT can only remove these Norton programs: | |||
| *Norton AntiSpam 2004 and 2005 | |||
| *] 2003 through 2012 | |||
| *] 2003,9.0,10.0,12.0,1 A.O and 15.0 | |||
| *] 3.1 through 4.2 | |||
| *] 2003 through 2012 | |||
| *Norton Password Manager | |||
| *] 2003 through 2006 | |||
| *] 2003 through 2009 | |||
| *Norton Confidential Online 2007 | |||
| *Norton Add-on Pack 1.0 - 4.0 | |||
| *Norton Save and Restore 1.0 through 2.0 | |||
| *]/Security Suite/Business Suite 1.0 - 5.0 | |||
| *Norton Safety Minder 1.0 | |||
| *] 3.2 | |||
| Once SymNRT has started the removal process, it cannot be stopped. It is recommended to close all running programs prior to running SymNRT. ] and ] users are recommended to back up their databases before running SymNRT. | |||
| === Incompatibilities with ZoneAlarm === | |||
| Norton AntiVirus 2007 will not install alongside ]. This incompatibility has caused annoyance for Norton customers who purchased Norton AntiVirus 2007 with no prior warning or notice of the incompatibility.<ref name = "Guardian-vsZoneAlarm">{{cite news| url=http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/askjack/2006/11/norton_av_versus_zone_alarm_ca.html | work=The Guardian | location=London | title=Norton AV versus Zone Alarm – can't you have both? | first=Jack | last=Schofield | date=2006-11-02 | accessdate=2010-05-20}}</ref> Symantec recommends removing ZoneAlarm, then reinstalling it with its Internet Worm Protection feature disabled, which controls what applications can access the Internet and which protocols they can use to do so. | |||
| ===PIFTS.exe=== | |||
| On March 9, 2009, some users of Norton AntiVirus 2006 and 2007 experienced a ] warning stating a Norton-associated file, "PIFTS.exe", was trying to connect to the ].<ref name=Beaumont2009>{{cite news | |||
| | last = Beaumont | first = Claudine | |||
| | title = Internet conspiracy theories abound over Symantec Pifts.exe file | |||
| | url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology/technology/technologynews/4969463/Internet-conspiracy-theories-abound-over-Symantec-Pifts.exe-file.html | |||
| | accessdate = March 10, 2009 | |||
| | work=The Daily Telegraph | |||
| | location=London | |||
| | date=2009-03-10 | |||
| }}</ref> Although this file was revealed to be a harmless diagnostic patch, the program gained attention in the media when Symantec removed posts from their forum concerning PIFTS. With no information available about the purpose of the program there was speculation that the program was ] or a ].<ref name=Krebs2009>{{cite news | |||
| | last = Krebs | first = Brian | |||
| | year = 2009 | |||
| | title = Users Complain of Mysterious 'PIFTS' Warning | |||
| | url = http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/03/symantec_users_complain_of_mys.html | |||
| | work=The Washington Post | |||
| | accessdate=2010-05-20 | |||
| }}</ref> | |||
| The ] claimed to have spoken to a Symantec employee who has confirmed that "the program is theirs, part of the update process and not intended to do harm."<ref name=Frantzen2009>{{cite web| last = Frantzen | first = Swa| year = 2009| title = Conspiracy fodder: pifts.exe| url = http://isc.sans.org/diary.html?storyid=5992}}</ref> Graham Cluley, a consultant from antivirus vendor ] found PIFTS connected to a Symantec server, forwarding product and computer information.<ref name=Sophos>{{cite web| last = Cluley | first = Graham| year = 2009| title = The mystery of Symantec and PIFTS.EXE| url = http://www.sophos.com/blogs/gc/g/2009/03/10/mystery-symantec-pifts/}}</ref> | |||
| On March 10, Symantec made an official response to the PIFTS program, claiming posts in the support forum were deleted due to ] rules; however the deletion of PIFTS-related posts began before the spam attacks.<ref name=Symantec2009>{{cite web | |||
| | last = Cole | first = Dave | |||
| | year = 2009 | |||
| | title = Norton product patch "PIFTS.exe" and Norton Users Forum | |||
| | url = http://community.norton.com/norton/board/message?board.id=nis_feedback&thread.id=39119 | |||
| }}</ref> Symantec stated PIFTS itself was a diagnostic patch.<ref name=Krebs2009 /> Cole stated the purpose of the update was to help determine how many customers would need to be migrated to ]-compatible versions of Norton AntiVirus. PIFTS apparently was released without a ] to verify its identity, causing firewalls to prompt for permission when it attempted to connect to the Internet.<ref>{{cite web | title=Cybercrooks Take Advantage of Symantec PIFTS.EXE Fuss | url=http://news.softpedia.com/news/Cybercrooks-Take-Advantage-of-Symantec-PIFTS-EXE-Fuss-106532.shtml | work=Lucian Constantin | publisher=Softpedia| date=March 11, 2009 | accessdate=2009-05-25}}</ref> | |||
| ===Consumer complaints=== | |||
| Symantec has been criticized by some consumers for perceived ethical violations, including allegations that support technicians would tell customers that their systems were infected and needed a technician to resolve it remotely for an extra fee, then refuse to refund when the customers alleged their systems had not actually been infected.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.consumeraffairs.com/computers/norton.html |title=Consumer complaints about Norton |publisher=Consumeraffairs.com |date= |accessdate=2010-11-09}}</ref> | |||
| Also there have been numerous complaints about the Auto-Renewal service of Norton which tends to renew the Subscription service without informing the customer until the customer is billed for it.{{Citation needed|date=October 2012}} | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 21:22, 13 May 2013
| File:NortonAntiVirus Icon.png | |
| Developer(s) | Symantec Corporation |
|---|---|
| Initial release | 1991; 33 years ago (1991) |
| Stable release | Windows: 22.21.10.40 (November 1, 2021; 3 years ago (2021-11-01)) [±] |
| Operating system | Microsoft Windows (Windows XP and later), Mac OS X, Linux |
| Type | Antivirus |
| License | Commercial proprietary software |
| Website | symantec |
Norton AntiVirus, developed and distributed by Symantec Corporation, provides malware prevention and removal during a subscription period. It uses signatures and heuristics to identify viruses. Other features include e-mail spam filtering and phishing protection.
Symantec distributes the product as a download, a box copy, and as OEM software. Norton AntiVirus and Norton Internet Security, a related product, held a 61% US retail market share for security suites as of the first half of 2007. Competitors, in terms of market share in this study, include antivirus products from CA, Trend Micro, and Kaspersky Lab.
Norton AntiVirus runs on Microsoft Windows and Mac OS X. Windows 7 support is in development for versions 2006 through 2008. Version 2009 has Windows 7 supported update already. Versions 2010, 2011, and 2012 all natively support Windows 7, without needing an update. Version 12 is the only version fully compatible with Mac OS X Lion.
Origins
In May 1989, Symantec launched Symantec Antivirus for the Macintosh (SAM). SAM 2.0, released March 1990, incorporated technology allowing users to easily update SAM to intercept and eliminate new viruses, including many that didn't exist at the time of the program's release.
In August 1990 Symantec acquired Peter Norton Computing from Peter Norton. Norton and his company developed various DOS utilities including the Norton Utilities, which did not include antivirus features. Symantec continued the development of acquired technologies. The technologies are marketed under the name of "Norton", with the tagline "from Symantec". Norton's crossed-arm pose, a registered U.S. trademark, was traditionally featured on Norton product packaging. However, his pose was later moved to the spine of the packaging, and eventually dropped altogether.
By early 1991, U.S. computers were invaded by hundreds of foreign virus strains and corporate PC infection was becoming a serious problem. Symantec's Norton Group launched Norton AntiVirus 1.0 (NAV) for PC and compatible computers. Ads for the product, with suggested retail $129, featured Norton in his crossed-arm pose, wearing a pink shirt and surgical mask covering his nose and mouth.
With the 1998 version 5.0 update, SAM was renamed Norton AntiVirus (NAV) for Macintosh.
Windows edition
Product activation was introduced in Norton AntiVirus 2004, addressing the estimated 3.6 million counterfeit Norton products sold. An alphanumeric code is generated to identify a computer's configuration, which ties in with the product key. Users are allowed to activate their product five times with the same product key. Spyware and adware detection and removal was introduced to the 2005 version, with the tagline "Antispyware Edition". The tagline was dropped in later releases. However, Norton AntiVirus 2009 Classic does not include spyware or adware detection. The Classic edition is marketed alongside Norton AntiVirus 2009, which does include spyware and adware detection.
Existing users of the 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 versions can upgrade to the latest 2010 version without buying a new subscription. Upgrading will preserve the number of days left on a user's subscription.
Version 2006 (13.0)
The redesigned main graphical user interface aggregates information in a central user interface. CNET reports the Norton Protection Center, while useful, attempts to advertise additional products. To further facilitate detection of zero-day malware, Bloodhound disassembles a variety of programming languages, and scans code for malicious instructions using predefined algorithms. Internet Explorer homepage hijacking protection was introduced in this release as well; however notably missing is search engine hijacking protection. CNET highlighted Norton AntiVirus 2006's noticeable impact on system performance.
Operating system requirements call for Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 or Windows XP. 150 MB of free space and a 300 MHz processor is required under either operating system. 128 MB of RAM is required under Windows 2000, while 256 MB is required in Windows XP.
Version 2007 (14.0)
Norton AntiVirus was released on September 12, 2006. Symantec revised Norton AntiVirus with the goal of reducing high system resource utilization. Windows Vista compatibility was introduced in this release as well. Despite having about 80% of the code rewritten, CNET reports mixed results in performance testing. New features include a tabbed interface, eliminating the need to have separate windows open for the Norton Protection Center and for configuring the settings. Symantec extended its Veritas VxMS rootkit detection technology, allowing Norton AntiVirus 2007 to inspect files within directories to files on the volume level, detecting abnormalities or inconsistencies.
Windows 2000 compatibility was dropped from this release. Compatibility with 32-bit versions of Windows Vista was added to this release with a patch from Symantec. Hardware requirements under Vista call for 150 MB free space, a 800 MHz processor and 512 MB RAM. Requirements under Windows XP similarly call for 150 MB free space, a 300 MHz processor, and 256 MB of RAM.
Version 2008 (15.0)
Norton AntiVirus 2008 was released on August 28, 2007. Emphasizing malware prevention, new features include SONAR, which looks for suspicious application behavior. This release adds real-time exploit protection, preventing attackers from leveraging common browser and application vulnerabilities.
When installed in 32-bit versions of Windows XP Service Pack 2, 300 MB of free space, a 300 MHz processor, and 256 MB of RAM is required. When installed in 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Windows Vista, 300 MB of free space, a 800 MHz processor, and 256 MB of RAM is needed.
Version 2009 (16.0)
Norton AntiVirus 2009 was released on September 8, 2008. Addressing performance issues, over 300 changes were made, with a "zero-impact" goal. Benchmarking conducted by Passmark Software PTY LTD highlights its 47 second install time, 32 second scan time, and 5 MB memory utilization. It should be noted Symantec funded the benchmark test and provided some scripts used to benchmark each participating antivirus software.
The security status and settings are now displayed in a single main interface. A CPU usage monitor displays the total CPU utilization and Norton's CPU usage in the main interface. Other features include Norton Insight, a whitelisting technology which cuts scanning times by mapping known safe files using information from an online database. To address malware response times, updates are delivered updates 5 to 15 minutes. However, such updates are not tested by Symantec, and may cause false positives, or incorrectly identify files as malicious. The exploit scanner found in the 2007 and 2008 versions was dropped from this release.
When installed in 32-bit versions of Windows XP Service Pack 2, 150 MB of free space, a 300 MHz processor, and 256 MB of RAM is required. When installed in 32-bit or 64-bit versions of Windows Vista, 150 MB of free space, a 800 MHz processor, and 512 MB of RAM is required.
Two variations on Norton AntiVirus 2009 are also marketed by Symantec. The Gaming edition provides finer control over when Norton downloads updates and allows components of the suite to be disabled either manually or automatically when the computer enters full-screen mode. The Classic edition cannot find or remove adware and spyware.
Version 2010 (17.0)
Version 17.0 was released on September 9, 2009. Several features have been updated in this release, including SONAR, now dubbed SONAR 2. It now uses more information to determine if an application is truly malicious. Norton Insight can present users with information about the origins, activities, and performance of applications along with reputation data. A new feature codenamed Autospy helps users understand what Norton did when malware was found. Previous releases removed threats on sight and quietly warned users, potentially confusing when users are deceived in downloading rogue security software. Much of this information is placed on the back of the main window; a toggle button switches between the sides. Symantec has also added Windows 7 support. Aside from that, Symantec has also added the Norton Download Insight to prevent drive by drive downloads.
Version 2011 (18.0)
 | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (February 2012) |
Version 2012 (19.0)
| This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (February 2012) |
Version 2013 (20.0)
| This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (September 2012) |
Windows 8 Consumer Preview compatibility
Windows 8 consumer preview was released on 29-th March, 2012. Symantec has announced in official post that Norton AntiVirus and Internet Security, as well as the newest Norton 360 v6 will be compatible with Windows 8.
Macintosh edition
Norton AntiVirus 11 for Mac introduced support for Mac OS X v10.5 Leopard platform, with the capability to detect both Macintosh and Windows malware. Other features include a vulnerability scanner, which blocks attackers from leveraging software exploits. Norton AntiVirus 11 also includes the ability to scan within compressed or archived files, such as Time Capsule volumes. Operating requirements call for Mac OS X Tiger. A PowerPC or an Intel Core processor, 128 MB of RAM, and 100 MB of free hard disk space are also required. Norton AntiVirus Dual Protection for Mac is intended for Macintosh users with Windows running on their systems, using Boot Camp or virtualization software such as VMWare Fusion. It provides a license for both Norton AntiVirus 11 with Norton AntiVirus 2009.
Norton vs. others
From the 2009 to 2012 editions, Symantec made huge changes to their products' speed and performance. Norton products now have only 2 running processes, using about 24 MB of RAM. According to tests sponsored by Symantec, PassMark Security Benchmark 2012 Norton AntiVirus and Norton Internet Security are the lightest suites available. Av-comparatives.org also tested these products and give similar results. PCMag recognises 2011 and 2012 lines as the fastest and strongest in protection. PCWorld's tests of security software put Norton Internet Security 2009 in the 1st place. In 2011's test of PCWorld Norton Internet Security was the winner. Dennis Technology Labs (in tests sponsored by Symantec) confirms the performance and effectiveness of Norton 2011 and 2012 lines.
See also
References
- "Channel Best-Sellers: Winning Security Players". CRN Staff. United Business Media LLC. November 23, 2007. Retrieved 2009-03-09.
- SAM Identifies Virus-Infected Files, Repairs Applications, InfoWorld, May 22, 1989
- SAM Update Lets Users Program for New Viruses, InfoWorld, Feb 19, 1990
- "COMPANY NEWS; Symantec to Acquire Peter Norton". Lawrence M. Fisher. The New York Times Company. May 15, 1990. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
- "Legal Notice – Symantec Canada". Symantec Corporation. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
- "SYMANTEC BRAND IDENTITY" (PDF). frog design inc. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
- Foreign Virus Strains Emerge as Latest Threat to U.S. PCs, InfoWorld, Feb 4, 1991
- Symantec Brings New Version of Top-Selling Macintosh AntiVirus Software into Norton Family of Products Press Release.
- "Symantec adds product activation". David Becker. CBS Interactive Inc. August 26, 2003. Retrieved 2009-03-31.
- "Norton Internet Security 2005 Antispyware Edition". Robert Vamosi. CBS Interactive Inc. April 18, 2005. Retrieved 2009-03-30.
- "The Norton Update Center". Symantec Corporation. Retrieved 2009-03-18.
- ^ sralls (October 3, 2005). "Norton AntiVirus 2006 Internet security and firewall reviews – CNET Reviews". Reviews.cnet.com. Retrieved 2009-02-23.
- "Bloodhound". Symantec. Retrieved 2009-02-23.
- "Symantec's Norton AntiVirus 2007, Norton Internet Security 2007 Provide State-Of-The-Art Security and Performance to Protect Against Today's Newest Threats". 09-12-2006. Retrieved 05-29-2010.
{{cite web}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=and|date=(help) - Reviewed by: Robert Vamosi. "Norton AntiVirus 2007 Internet security and firewall reviews – CNET Reviews". Reviews.cnet.com. Retrieved 2009-02-23.
- ^ Reviewed by: Robert Vamosi. "Norton AntiVirus 2007 Internet security and firewall reviews – CNET Reviews". Reviews.cnet.com. Retrieved 2009-02-23.
- "New Zealand PC World Magazine > Symantec unveils Browser Defender in its 2008 consumer security software". Pcworld.co.nz. 2007-08-30. Retrieved 2010-11-09.
- "Symantec unveils Browser Defender in its 2008 consumer security software". Gregg Keizer. Fairfax New Zealand Limited. August 30, 2007. Retrieved 2009-03-07.
- Rubenking, Neil J. (2008-11-25). "Symantec Launches Norton Antivirus 'Gaming Edition'". PC Magazine. Retrieved 2009-02-24.
- "Symantec Launches Fastest Security Products in the World". Marketwire, Incorporated. September 9, 2008. Retrieved 2009-03-04.
- Passmark Software (February 2009),Antivirus, Internet Security and Total Security Products Performance Benchmarking (2009) Vista/Dual Core Hardware, retrieved 4 October 2012
- Tal (January 5, 2009). "Norton Internet Security 2009". geekstogo.com. Retrieved 2009-01-07.
- ^ Neil J. Rubenking (July 2, 2009). "Symantec Releases Norton 2010 Betas". PC Magazine. Retrieved 15 July 2009.
- Preston Gralla (July 7, 2009). "Norton Internet Security 2010 beta: Different approach, new features, some glitches". Thomson Reuters. Retrieved 8 July 2009.
- Microsoft to release windows 8 consumer preview on 29th March
- Norton is Windows 8 compatible according to Symantec.
- "Norton AntiVirus 11 for Leopard Announced". PC World Communications, Inc. December 10, 2007. Retrieved 2009-02-28.
- "Norton Antivirus 11.0 for Mac". about.com. Retrieved 2009-02-24.
- "Norton AntiVirus 11 for Mac". Symantec. Retrieved 2009-02-24.
- "Norton AntiVirus Dual Protection for Mac". Symantec. Retrieved 2009-02-24.
- "2012 Consumer Security Products Performance Benchmarks (Edition 1)" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-10-04.
- "Performance Test Internet Security Suites - July 2011" (PDF). Retrieved 2012-10-04.
- Rubenking, Neil J. "Norton Internet Security 2012". PC Magazine.
- Larkin, Erik (2009-01-22). "Top Internet Security Suites: Paying for Protection". PCWorld. Retrieved 2012-10-04.
- Dennis Technology Labs (26 January 2011), PC Total Protection Suites 2011, retrieved 4 October 2012
