Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Wikipediocracy: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:27, 19 May 2013 editShirt58 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators67,636 edits Creating deletion discussion page for Wikipediocracy. (TW)  Revision as of 10:43, 19 May 2013 edit undoShirt58 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators67,636 edits WP:TWINKLE has added a space before my sig. Format tidy. Link WP:CIVIL. Remove duplicated text: "may as well get this get " -> "may as well get this"Next edit →
Line 4: Line 4:
:{{la|Wikipediocracy}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>) :{{la|Wikipediocracy}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} <span class="plainlinks"></span>)
:({{Find sources|Wikipediocracy}}) :({{Find sources|Wikipediocracy}})
OK, may as well get this get this started: it just hasn't got enough coverage yet. Fails ], specific guideline ]. Yes, it was mentioned in ], exactly once. Is ] a reliable source? Hmm... ] is of course a ] source about itself. And so on. ] it ain't. OK, may as well get this started: it just hasn't got enough coverage yet. Fails ], specific guideline ]. Yes, it was mentioned in ], exactly once. Is ] a reliable source? Hmm... ] is of course a ] source about itself. And so on. ] it ain't.<br />
In my opinion, this AfD was inevitable, and probably best if an uncontroversial wikignome (and one who is happy to admit when they are wrong) kicks off. Keep it nice and stick to the relevant criteria for deletion, people. In my opinion, this AfD was inevitable, and probably best if an uncontroversial wikignome (and one who is happy to admit when they are wrong) kicks off. <br />
] and stick to the relevant criteria for deletion, people.
] (]) 10:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC) ] (]) 10:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:43, 19 May 2013

Wikipediocracy

Wikipediocracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

OK, may as well get this started: it just hasn't got enough coverage yet. Fails WP:GNG, specific guideline WP:WEB. Yes, it was mentioned in a reliable source, exactly once. Is The Daily Dot a reliable source? Hmm... Wikipediocracy is of course a WP:PRIMARY source about itself. And so on. Slashdot it ain't.
In my opinion, this AfD was inevitable, and probably best if an uncontroversial wikignome (and one who is happy to admit when they are wrong) kicks off.
Keep it nice and stick to the relevant criteria for deletion, people. Shirt58 (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Categories: