User talk:Incnis Mrsi/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

< User talk:Incnis Mrsi Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 14:22, 20 May 2013 editDrmies (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,272 edits →Talk page, user page issues: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:01, 20 May 2013 edit undoIncnis Mrsi (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,646 edits →Talk page, user page issues: reNext edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from {{IP\|76.189.109.155}} about , for which you gave them . In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in ]. In addition, your comment to them, , is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to ], which says that ''moving'' the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in ], is the preferred method. Thank you. ] (]) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)		Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from {{IP\|76.189.109.155}} about , for which you gave them . In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in ]. In addition, your comment to them, , is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to ], which says that ''moving'' the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in ], is the preferred method. Thank you. ] (]) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
			: There are reasons for which the cut-and-paste is preferred for frequently used public talk pages, but I do not see a problem in moving the old talk page; drop me a link if there were arguments against it even as a manually-controlled operation. Please, specify at least ten of my ''inappropriate templated warnings'' (or apologize for your defamation) and, possibly, I will continue to communicate with you. I am not willing discuss 76.189.109.155 publicly any more — reply to my email please if you have further questions. ] (]) 15:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:01, 20 May 2013

User talk:Incnis Mrsi/Archive 2/^

Talk page, user page issues

Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from 76.189.109.155 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) about this edit of theirs, for which you gave them this warning. In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in Misplaced Pages:Vandalism. In addition, your comment to them, "I am really happy that English Misplaced Pages has so few people here like you, 76.189.109.155", is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to Help:Archiving a talk page/Other procedures, which says that moving the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in Help:Archiving_a_talk_page#Cut_and_paste_procedure, is the preferred method. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

There are reasons for which the cut-and-paste is preferred for frequently used public talk pages, but I do not see a problem in moving the old talk page; drop me a link if there were arguments against it even as a manually-controlled operation. Please, specify at least ten of my inappropriate templated warnings (or apologize for your defamation) and, possibly, I will continue to communicate with you. I am not willing discuss 76.189.109.155 publicly any more — reply to my email please if you have further questions. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:22, 20 May 2013 editDrmies (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators406,272 edits →Talk page, user page issues: new section← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:01, 20 May 2013 edit undoIncnis Mrsi (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,646 edits →Talk page, user page issues: reNext edit →
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from {{IP\|76.189.109.155}} about , for which you gave them . In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in ]. In addition, your comment to them, , is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to ], which says that ''moving'' the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in ], is the preferred method. Thank you. ] (]) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)		Hello Incnis Mrsi. I got a note from {{IP\|76.189.109.155}} about , for which you gave them . In my opinion, such a warning--for vandalism!--is seriously overblown. So they made a mistake by posting a notice on the user page rather than the talk page; that's not vandalism by a long stretch, since vandalism is defined as a conscious attempt to disrupt the project and there is no reason to think that their edit falls under vandalism as defined in ]. In addition, your comment to them, , is blatantly uncivil. From what I can tell, this IP editor is a valuable contributor, and at the very least you should have applied good faith and refrained from personal insults; that kind of behavior creates a nasty atmosphere in which people will be less likely to want to contribute to our beautiful project. I hope you will cease to make such comments and leave such inappropriate templated warnings. In addition, I saw you archived your talk page right after that exchange; please allow me to point you to ], which says that ''moving'' the talk page to create an archive is now deprecated. Copying and pasting, as described in ], is the preferred method. Thank you. ] (]) 14:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
			: There are reasons for which the cut-and-paste is preferred for frequently used public talk pages, but I do not see a problem in moving the old talk page; drop me a link if there were arguments against it even as a manually-controlled operation. Please, specify at least ten of my ''inappropriate templated warnings'' (or apologize for your defamation) and, possibly, I will continue to communicate with you. I am not willing discuss 76.189.109.155 publicly any more — reply to my email please if you have further questions. ] (]) 15:01, 20 May 2013 (UTC)