| Revision as of 18:57, 22 May 2013 editPamD (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers205,928 edits →Feedback please: clarify← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:49, 22 May 2013 edit undoChed (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users64,984 edits →Warning: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
| Please offer some feedback at ] to explain (to him and his talk page stalkers like me) what logic the bot was using in mistakenly accusing him of vandalism, and - and to reassure us that this isn't the bot being ]y to a technically "new" editor, in a way which would make a genuinely new and useful editor likely to throw in the towel. It's worrying. (Oh, and second time round the bot failed to create a section heading.) ]] 18:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC) | Please offer some feedback at ] to explain (to him and his talk page stalkers like me) what logic the bot was using in mistakenly accusing him of vandalism, and - and to reassure us that this isn't the bot being ]y to a technically "new" editor, in a way which would make a genuinely new and useful editor likely to throw in the towel. It's worrying. (Oh, and second time round the bot failed to create a section heading.) ]] 18:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Warning == | |||
| Per the section above by PamD, if ClueBot NG continues making false accusations of vandalism against, new, established, or good faith editors - I will block it. Hopefully ] and/or ] will notice this ping and make whatever fixes are needed here. Thank you. — <small><span class="nowrap" style="border:1px solid #000000;padding:1px;"><b>]</b> : ]</span></small> 19:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:49, 22 May 2013
ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Review edits for the dataset • Frequently Asked Questions False PositivesIf you believe that ClueBot NG has made a mistake, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or click here. Please do not report them here. It takes less time to report them to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively if reported in the correct location. Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
Template:Archive box collapsible
| ClueBots | |
|---|---|
| ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script |  |
| ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
|
Bot needs training
If the bot sends a message to a user who changed things to follow the manual of style, something needs to change, or amusement will increase, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:32, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
hey hey hey, you like pancakes? i do, thxx for everything
Aambeienbeffer (talk) 09:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Why isn't ClueBot III archiving my talk page?
Could someone check it, please? And is it possible to display my previous, manually archived threads inside that ClueBot archivebox? Thanks, smtchahal 06:22, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Feedback please
Please offer some feedback at User talk:Eric Corbett to explain (to him and his talk page stalkers like me) what logic the bot was using in mistakenly accusing him of vandalism, once and twice - and to reassure us that this isn't the bot being WP:BITEy to a technically "new" editor, in a way which would make a genuinely new and useful editor likely to throw in the towel. It's worrying. (Oh, and second time round the bot failed to create a section heading.) PamD 18:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Warning
Per the section above by PamD, if ClueBot NG continues making false accusations of vandalism against, new, established, or good faith editors - I will block it. Hopefully User:Cobi and/or User:Crispy1989 will notice this ping and make whatever fixes are needed here. Thank you. — Ched : ? 19:49, 22 May 2013 (UTC)