Misplaced Pages

talk:Articles for deletion/Philip Sandifer: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:42, 29 May 2006 editCrum375 (talk | contribs)Administrators23,960 edits →Reopening← Previous edit Revision as of 00:43, 29 May 2006 edit undoCrum375 (talk | contribs)Administrators23,960 editsm →Reopening: typoNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
:It seemed like a very odd way to close, particularly given that no action approaching a merge (or even a removal of the AfD tag!) was even undertaken. -]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 00:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC) :It seemed like a very odd way to close, particularly given that no action approaching a merge (or even a removal of the AfD tag!) was even undertaken. -]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 00:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
::Sorry for reverting Splash. I had thought it was vandalism at first then realized who he was. I do think that AfD's should last their full length of given time. --] 00:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC) ::Sorry for reverting Splash. I had thought it was vandalism at first then realized who he was. I do think that AfD's should last their full length of given time. --] 00:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
*'''Comment'''. I think this is very inappropriate. First, I think that admins who vote should not close, revert or otherwise use their admin powers on a given AfD. Also, when if re-opened, it should include a paste of all previous discussion. ] 00:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC) *'''Comment'''. I think this is very inappropriate. First, I think that admins who vote should not close, revert or otherwise use their admin powers on a given AfD. Also, if re-opened, it should include a paste of all previous discussion. ] 00:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:43, 29 May 2006

Reopening

I don't know about the appropriateness of me reverting Tony, as I was involved in the debate, but then he voted on it too, so it's inappropriateness all round, it seems.

I see Splash has also reverted, so I'm going ahead and restarting this debate. It is meant to last for five days, and I see no harm in allowing that to take place. The debate is not at all vitriolic; quite the reverse, in fact, which I'm glad to see. I think we should only close it early if Phil requests it and no one objects. SlimVirgin 00:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

It seemed like a very odd way to close, particularly given that no action approaching a merge (or even a removal of the AfD tag!) was even undertaken. -Splash 00:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry for reverting Splash. I had thought it was vandalism at first then realized who he was. I do think that AfD's should last their full length of given time. --Strothra 00:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. I think this is very inappropriate. First, I think that admins who vote should not close, revert or otherwise use their admin powers on a given AfD. Also, if re-opened, it should include a paste of all previous discussion. Crum375 00:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)