| Revision as of 00:44, 29 May 2006 editBdj (talk | contribs)19,739 edits →Reopening: no.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:45, 29 May 2006 edit undoSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)172,064 edits →ReopeningNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| *'''Comment'''. I think this is very inappropriate. First, I think that admins who vote should not close, revert or otherwise use their admin powers on a given AfD. Also, if re-opened, it should include a paste of all previous discussion. ] 00:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | *'''Comment'''. I think this is very inappropriate. First, I think that admins who vote should not close, revert or otherwise use their admin powers on a given AfD. Also, if re-opened, it should include a paste of all previous discussion. ] 00:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *There's not a reason to close early here. None. It's not a speedy candidate on either side. --] <small>(])</small> 00:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | *There's not a reason to close early here. None. It's not a speedy candidate on either side. --] <small>(])</small> 00:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :All the discussion is included, Crum. We just reverted Tony's premature closure of it. ] <sup><font color="Purple">]</font></sup> 00:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:45, 29 May 2006
Reopening
I don't know about the appropriateness of me reverting Tony, as I was involved in the debate, but then he voted on it too, so it's inappropriateness all round, it seems.
I see Splash has also reverted, so I'm going ahead and restarting this debate. It is meant to last for five days, and I see no harm in allowing that to take place. The debate is not at all vitriolic; quite the reverse, in fact, which I'm glad to see. I think we should only close it early if Phil requests it and no one objects. SlimVirgin 00:34, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- It seemed like a very odd way to close, particularly given that no action approaching a merge (or even a removal of the AfD tag!) was even undertaken. -Splash 00:37, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for reverting Splash. I had thought it was vandalism at first then realized who he was. I do think that AfD's should last their full length of given time. --Strothra 00:38, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I think this is very inappropriate. First, I think that admins who vote should not close, revert or otherwise use their admin powers on a given AfD. Also, if re-opened, it should include a paste of all previous discussion. Crum375 00:42, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- There's not a reason to close early here. None. It's not a speedy candidate on either side. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 00:44, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
- All the discussion is included, Crum. We just reverted Tony's premature closure of it. SlimVirgin 00:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC)