Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:03, 30 May 2013 editTJRC (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,493 edits "Missing persons" category: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 15:05, 3 June 2013 edit undoMike Cline (talk | contribs)Administrators53,120 edits Input required at Talk:Alger Hiss: new sectionNext edit →
Line 62: Line 62:


I noticed a couple of removals today of this cat (, ), and while I don't think the removal is appropriate, I'm unsure and unable to find if there's a consensus in the crime community on this; hence the question. ] (]) I noticed a couple of removals today of this cat (, ), and while I don't think the removal is appropriate, I'm unsure and unable to find if there's a consensus in the crime community on this; hence the question. ] (])

== Input required at ] ==

A couple of editors have been edit warring over some specific wording in the lead of ]. For the most part it appears the content dispute relates to the reliability of and weight to be given to specific sources. The editors are now to address the content dispute in a rational manner. Input from interested parties in this project would be useful. --] (]) 15:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:05, 3 June 2013

This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography and anything related to its purposes and tasks.
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Auto-archiving period: 31 days 
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
WikiProject iconCrime and Criminal Biography
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related

Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6



This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

The Mann Act

The Misplaced Pages article about the Mann Act has Charles Manson listed as "convicted" under this law. Charles Manson's biography on Misplaced Pages says he was aquitted of this charge. Both authors of these articles cite the same source. To the reader the distinction between the two words is critical to gaining proper insight.

Bindy Johal edits

Uncited material has been added to this page, plus a reformatting of the list of charges......the claim that he committed the most crimes in Canada is definitely in need of citation, if it's true. This page and other Vancouver gang-related articles seem to have a lot of IP edits.....hoping members of this group place this and related articles on their watchlist; not an article I like messing with "because of who it is".Skookum1 (talk) 07:44, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

2013 Boston Marathon finish line explosion.png

file:2013 Boston Marathon finish line explosion.png is under NFCR -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 08:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Waterboard3-small.jpg

file:Waterboard3-small.jpg is listed at NFCR -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 08:22, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Mugshot of Josef Fritzl on the night of his arrest.jpg

image:Mugshot of Josef Fritzl on the night of his arrest.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Lawende.jpg

File:Lawende.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 03:46, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Building after 1998 bomb blast.jpg

File:Building after 1998 bomb blast.jpg has been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 05:48, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Categories for prostitution

There is a discussion going on Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Feminism#Help_cleaning_up_Category:Prostitutes which could use input from this project - specifically on a few questions around categorization:

  1. Is there a general rule as to what *sort* of categories can/should be created to classify those who have committed crimes?

More specifically:

  1. What are your thoughts on creating a category for Category:People convicted for prostitution
  2. What are your thoughts on creating a category for Category:People convicted for solicitation

Thanks! --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 04:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Shah Commission files

have been nominated for deletion -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 07:37, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

"Missing persons" category

When a missing persons case is resolved, does that make categories such as Category:Missing person cases in the United States no longer applicable? My take is the case is a missing persons case, even after resolution and the person is no longer missing. A robbery remains a robbery even after the perpetrator is caught and restitution made, by comparison.

I noticed a couple of removals today of this cat (, ), and while I don't think the removal is appropriate, I'm unsure and unable to find if there's a consensus in the crime community on this; hence the question. TJRC (talk)

Input required at Talk:Alger Hiss

A couple of editors have been edit warring over some specific wording in the lead of Alger Hiss. For the most part it appears the content dispute relates to the reliability of and weight to be given to specific sources. The editors are now trying to craft an RFC to address the content dispute in a rational manner. Input from interested parties in this project would be useful. --Mike Cline (talk) 15:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Categories: