Revision as of 13:01, 4 June 2013 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,860 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:08, 5 June 2013 edit undoGSK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users16,272 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Bob's Burgers (season 4). (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 13:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 13:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
== June 2013 == | |||
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #0099FF, -4px -4px 15px #99FF00;">]</span> ● <span style="text-shadow: 4px 4px 15px #FF9900, -4px -4px 15px #FF0099;">] ]</span> 21:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:08, 5 June 2013
Welcome
Hi Beerest355, thanks for the contributions you've made here. There's a Primer for newcomers that you might want to review if you would like to get a good start on learning any policies here, otherwise you can check out Help:Contents/Directory for a list of pages you can use for assistance. You can also feel free to ask me any questions on my talk page. Have a good one and happy editing, Ryan Vesey 19:50, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
Lost in Space
Hey! Thanks for the note. And no, thank you, thank you! I was just thrilled that there was a person starting these episode articles for season 9. I hope you create more articles for season 9 episodes actually. We need them. And you and I can edit them together. ;) Thus far, thanks to you, we now have at least the one, so good work!
Apologies on the past tense/present tense issue. I used past tense just because the event isn't currently happening and is now a past occurrence. In my college journalism program, I was taught that if an event is not presently happening and is in the past, you always write in past tense. But, I assume you reference a specialized Misplaced Pages policy when you say present tense is the rule, correct? So yea, my apologies! Also, yea, I suppose my dating was a bit extraneous as well. I will say, however, that I stand by my "story arc" edit as it clarified in formal terms that the episode was apart of a continuation plot. In addition, I don't agree with placement of the "precursor recap" in the lead. As according to Misplaced Pages policy, leads are supposed to briefly touch upon items and not go into detail. That recap is to detailed for a lead and belongs back where it was in my humble opinion. And it flows into the plot nicely.
I can agree with you as to my edit about Jeff not showing up on the following episode not belonging in the plot section. But I thought it was worth mentioning at least somewhere, but if you don't think so, it's no biggie. AmericanDad86 (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Ah, thanks. I'm indeed quoting a guideline for the plot tense (WP:MOSWAF#Contextual_presentation). I think the recap should be placed in the plot, albeit slightly shortened. I think I will start working on a page for Naked to the Limit, One More Time as that episode ties into Lost in Space and another would help explain Lost in Space better. Beerest355 Talk 22:21, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Ahhh, yezzzz! It seemzzz you are right Beerest, it seemz you are right. :D My apologies on the past tense revisions. Man oh man, a lot of Misplaced Pages policies contradict stuff you're taught in school. Anyways, YAY! I can't wait for you to create The Naked to the Limit, One More Time article. I look forward to being of any help I can. And from the vibe I get from you, I like your editing style and sense I'm going to enjoy working on episode articles with you. Do you like how I'm assuming you're going to start out a bunch of articles for American Dad 9th season episodes by the way?! lol! :P Btw, you must start one for Da Flippity Flo. That was one of my favorite episodes. :D AmericanDad86 (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Get out of town! You seriously completed all that within a few hours of my request?! I was expecting more of a "Maybe sometime in the future if I have a chance." :D And not only that but a job well done/well written at that. You, sir, get a big fat barnstar for that one. And take that with pride as I never give out barnstars. Never! Before now, I had yet to come across anyone I felt truly deserving of one.
The Special Barnstar | ||
message AmericanDad86 (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC) |
AmericanDad86 (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the inspiration to do the following with my talkpage here. AmericanDad86 (talk) 03:11, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cortright, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cartwright (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Your recent editing history at Bob's Burgers (season 4) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 21:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)