Revision as of 12:51, 28 May 2006 editAhwaz (talk | contribs)1,959 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:27, 30 May 2006 edit undoKhorshid (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,835 edits →BlockedNext edit → | ||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:::Also, you have accused me of vandalism, but blocked me for a 3RR violation. Which is it? Vandalism or 3RR violation?--] 12:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC) | :::Also, you have accused me of vandalism, but blocked me for a 3RR violation. Which is it? Vandalism or 3RR violation?--] 12:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC) | ||
Please revert LukasPietschs harassment on my talk. He is threatening me with a block and I have a right to remove his racist comments. ] 12:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:27, 30 May 2006
If you look at any UN map, Kosovo is a part of Serbia. End of discussion. -- serbiana - talk 00:48, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
I agree. -- serbiana - talk 00:54, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Anti-Persianism by Arabs
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --ManiF 06:29, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
There is no 3RR. You need to show the proof.--الأهواز 10:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Blocked
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Misplaced Pages. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. ←Humus sapiens 10:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- What vandalism? I haven't vandalised anything and you have not even bothered to detail the charges against me or what article you are referring to.--الأهواز 10:31, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- This was not a revert as I removed content that I had not removed before, but kept content that I had previously removed. Compare it with . However, some of my edits to the page have been repeatedly blanked by two editors working in unison: , , , , , . Will you move to deal with this blanking of my edits? I hope you will be fair to all sides.--الأهواز 10:49, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Please reread WP:3RR: "There is no requirement for the reverts to be related: any four reverts on the same page count." Thanks. ←Humus sapiens 11:26, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't realise that if I remove different parts of the same article, I am reverting. If that is the case, then the problem of reverting my edits is worse than I thought. Will you follow up the six reverts above, including four by Zereshk and two by ManiF, who appear to be working in unison?--الأهواز 11:33, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
- Also, you have accused me of vandalism, but blocked me for a 3RR violation. Which is it? Vandalism or 3RR violation?--الأهواز 12:51, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Please revert LukasPietschs harassment on my talk. He is threatening me with a block and I have a right to remove his racist comments. Khorshid 12:27, 30 May 2006 (UTC)