Revision as of 11:28, 11 June 2013 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots668,773 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:48, 12 June 2013 edit undoSitush (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers260,192 edits →AAP: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 11:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
== AAP == | |||
If you cannot be sensible at ] then I suggest that you leave the article alone. You clearly have a POV and it appears to be affecting your judgement. At best, I suggest you confine yourself to raising concerns on the article talk page. - ] (]) 16:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:48, 12 June 2013
Verify the date IAC formation date from third party published source. ThinkingYouth (talk) 10:11, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to India Against Corruption may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨) |
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Humjanege uncle
Thank you for your edits! ThinkingYouth (talk) 11:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for your edits uncle..!
ThinkingYouth (talk) 11:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
take part in Article Talk page before blatantly deleting article material ! don't corrupt wikipedia articles! on your personal grudges and enmity
The donor list link on Aam aadami party wiki page is working fine. Don't make flying claim before self check . Misplaced Pages is not a soapbox for making Vandalism grudges on personal agendas. ThinkingYouth (talk) 14:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
AAP-IAC edit war
Hello. You have a new message at ThinkingYouth's talk page. Bubka42 (talk) 08:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
India Against Corruption
Hello, AcorruptionfreeIndia! I've noticed that the currently-locked article India Against Corruption about a socio-political movement in India is largely maintained by you. Sections of it need major cleanup regarding their tone and style to improve its quality as a Misplaced Pages article. Please remember that your personal prejudices should never reflect in your contributions to Misplaced Pages (except in your choice of topics to work on, which is only natural). Non-neutral lines such as "IAC's current objective, as stated on its website, is for direct participatory democracy of citizens (without caring about leaders or big names) to rid the Greater Indian nation of corruption, wherever it is found by whatever means necessary" must be explicitly quoted even if it's extracted verbatim from a third-party source. This and other unencyclopaedic segments (like "a reluctant media, tired from last year’s breathless coverage, turned up in a tepid trickle" and "Nothing could disguise the thinning crowds from the cameras overhead") abound in the article. Please consider revising these once the edit-lock is lifted, by either adding quotes or rewriting in neutral tone. This has the potential to be a decent article, so will look forward to your continued good work on this and other pages. Thank you! Bubka42 (talk) 09:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
why you changed/edited my talk page. ThinkingYouth (talk) 19:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on June 10
Your recent editing history at June 10 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution . In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection ThinkingYouth (talk) 20:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
ANI Notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Somnath Bharti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President George Bush (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
AAP
If you cannot be sensible at Aam Aadmi Party then I suggest that you leave the article alone. You clearly have a POV and it appears to be affecting your judgement. At best, I suggest you confine yourself to raising concerns on the article talk page. - Sitush (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)