Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:40, 12 June 2013

Template:Archive box collapsible

Think you'd appreciate this

Not sure how to best show it on the article though. Some images at commons:Category:Dustforce too. As the game is one of many in my Steam to-play list, I've not really done much with the image description pages - if you're more familiar with what's going on in the screenshots, it might be worth taking your time to update them. - hahnchen 01:28, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I think I'll add a screenshot too since video is not always available to all users. --MASEM (t) 23:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Your recent editing history at My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Spshu (talk) 20:42, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

According to https://en.wiktionary.org/spoiler, a spoiler is something that ruins a twist ending. Just because an episode has aired does not make the ending any less of a twist. --Torourkeus (talk) 01:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Read WP:SPOILER. Once it is aired, anything revealed in an episode is fair game for an encyclopedia if it is appropriate. Here, revealing that John Hurt plays the Doctor at some point is a very key fact. --MASEM (t) 01:59, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: User talk:BDD#GA on Brown vs EMA

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

• News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list

• WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts

• Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map

• In the media: PR firm accused of editing Misplaced Pages for government clients; can Misplaced Pages predict the stock market?

• Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 02:13, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Help page edit

I just made an edit to Help:Contents that I assumed was there before. I think the wording is ok but others may wish to discuss it and tweak it.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

It was reverted so I started a discussion on Help talk:Contents.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:45, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to take a short survey about communication and efficiency of WikiProjects for my research

Hi Masem, I'm working on a project to study the running of WikiProject and possible performance measures for it. I learn from WikiProject Video games talk page that you are an active member of the project. I would like to invite you to take a short survey for my study. If you are available to take our survey, could you please reply an email to me? I'm new to Misplaced Pages, I can't send too many emails to other editors due to anti-spam measure. Thank you very much for your time. Xiangju (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

My out of line comment

Regarding the comment I made on the Tornado talk page... you were right to remove it. I was out of line. Shadowjams (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: Comments on two AFD closures

I've revised Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Frankstown Township Shooting (2nd nomination) to no consensus, but I would assert that the consensus on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/2012 Seattle cafe shooting spree was more clearly a keep. While we're not vote counting, nobody else made any arguments in the discussion against keeping the article. LFaraone 02:41, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

• Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment

• WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome

• News and notes: Spanish Misplaced Pages leaps past one million articles

• In the media: Qworty incident continues

• Featured content: Up in the air

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:39, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Brown v. EMA

Heads up. --Nstrauss (talk) 01:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Do you have thoughts on my latest comment? I'd re-revert my deletion now, but I don't want to step on your toes if you're still considering a response. --Nstrauss (talk) 18:26, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

NFC overrules inclusion?

Here's what I don't get: if the logos are okay to use on the pages of each individual system, then why not on the overall generation pages? That also applies to the Xbox One photo. I would've assumed that non-free means we're not allowed to use them at all, and so far the debates on the images' deletion proposal pages are leaning towards keep. Why the discrepancy? VinLAURiA (talk) 05:54, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Non-free means that any use of the images must be in-line with minimizing non-free use per WP:NFCC and WP:NFC. Using logos on the page of the product they show - that's fine. Using logos on a comparison table is not. See WP:NFC#UUI for examples of where non-free is not allowed. --MASEM (t) 13:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

• News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions

• In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing

• Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money

• WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates

• Featured content: Life of 2π

• Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Misplaced Pages; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Misplaced Pages than the English Misplaced Pages?

• Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 07:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Request for your input

Can you comment at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Werieth_reported_by_User:Expatkiwi_.28Result:_.29. thanks Werieth (talk) 14:42, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Equestria Girls

Why did you undo my edit to the My Little Pony Equestria Girls?169.244.47.131 (talk) 18:40, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Because saying Equestria Girls will be rated R is patently false. --MASEM (t) 18:43, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Is Equestria Girls for children like My Little Pony Friendship is Magic?169.244.47.131 (talk) 19:21, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

3RR

First, you lied about 3RR, I only made 2 reverts. And what do you mean "The way this is presently is purposely biased"? It made no sense. Shrine Maiden 16:23, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

So you know, he's putting the same edit on PlayStation 4. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 16:35, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Saying you're at 3RR is a shortcut to say that the next edit will make you run afoul of policy. As for the edit, while being a user poll in of itself is not necessarily bad (but as cautioned by others, can be subject to ballet-stuffing), writing in the manner "The Xbox One lost every category" is clearly biasing the results to the PS4. I know the Xbox One has gotten negative feedback from users, but that should be a section that describes that from secondary sources, not user polls. --MASEM (t) 16:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

I looked at the source added by Shrine Maiden ... votes were based on number of views of videos posted on the site. This is totally prone to ballot-stuffing, so it shouldn't be in either article. I did clarify on SM's talk page that the warning you posted was about edit-warring and that they were in danger of 3RR if they kept it up. They have deleted the notices, which I interpret as meaning they've seen them and are acting in accordance with them. --McDoobAU93 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

More than one image used in EastEnders characters articles

Look at Ian Beale and Dot Cotton, for example. They used more than one image. I wonder if that is too excessive per WP:NFCC. If so, can you at least bring this up in WP:EE or discuss this with AnemoneProjectors, an administrator? Also, look at David Watts. Is there no significant differences, especially when physical appearances are not discussed by text? --George Ho (talk) 22:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

They might be, but a big difference here is that there is significant visual differences between the characters that it may be appropriate to have both shown (compared to Frasier where there's no effective change in appearance since the shows were back-to-back). This is not saying that they need all those images, but there's at least a possible starting point. --MASEM (t) 23:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

What about Simon Wicks? Any other articles that use excessive amount of images? --George Ho (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC) And Christian Clarke? --George Ho (talk) 23:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

THere's only one non-free on Simon's article (The other is a free image of the actor, which is always fine). But you're basically using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS which isn't a good argument. Each image use has to stand on its own. --MASEM (t) 23:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

... I didn't realize that the other non-free image was removed from the article... or I forgot that it was gone for a while. As for the "other stuff exists" stuff, citing this essay for non-deletion arguments is okay... or not, but that essay is intended for only deletion discussions. You know what? If people want to change the essay's scope, then... where can I start? RFC in talk page or WP:VPPR? --George Ho (talk) 00:03, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

My mistake; I presumed that it redirects to a section of WP:AADD. --George Ho (talk) 00:04, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Confused

I'm confused by your response to my comment on WT:NFC; it seems as if you've interpreted my support for the application of fair use on Misplaced Pages (and by extention, the main page) as being entirely based on the legal ramifications of doing so, rather than the dichotomy it creates when juxtaposed with our mission to creat a 💕. I guess that wasn't the most appropriate venue to voice my very unpopular views on fair use legislation — specifically, I believe that such works should be recognized as free media from a legal perspective. The reason for that is because I don't see how the redistribution of something such as an album cover or a song's lyrics would have a detrimental effect on the ability of the copyright holder to profit off of their intellectual property. Obviously the WMF would never permit that, nor would the community by a large. That is simply my opinion.

I've also responded there. Specifically, I made clear where I stand on the usage of fair use media on the main page. Does that make any sense? Kurtis 13:52, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but that's still not valid for what we call "free", but I'll expand there. --MASEM (t) 14:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I know the widely accepted definition of "free"; I'm aware of copyright laws, what constitutes fair use according to US law, how something can be considered public domain, etc. I can practically recite most of the Creative Commons licenses off by heart. But I can accept that everyone else's perspective is different from mine. Maybe that wasn't the best place to articulate my opinion on the matter. Kurtis 15:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

My Little Pony Friendship is Magic in Japan

Is My Little Pony Friendship is Magic for young children in Japan?184.20.209.241 (talk) 02:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

My Little Pony Friendship is Magic in Japan part 2

What do you mean I asked a question with a obvious answer. Is the obvious answer for my question about My Little Pony Friendship is Magic being for children in Japan yes?184.20.209.241 (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Message to User talk:46.197.130.76

I saw that you left a message to the IP stating something about MOS:FLAG. I left a minor correction, as it has long been a practice to include the flags of the locations visited within the "Race summary" sections of the various articles rather than in the results table (which is something I've seen done on other language projects). Would you then say that the current practice for Amazing Race pages is wrong? As when there was a minor kerfluffle about it (when one of the other versions entered the West Bank territory) people saw the flags as useful and helpful.—Ryulong (琉竜) 01:52, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

There's two primary reasons that in the summary table it's bad: first, one shouldn't assume readers recognize countries by flag alone (in fact, that's against accessibility too) and secondly, that implies a leg is confined to one country which obviously not true. They are fine in the leg descriptions because we have the country name right there and we're breaking out all locations visited during the leg. --MASEM (t) 01:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Equestria Girls Question

Do you think Equestria Girls will be a good movie or not?184.20.209.241 (talk) 17:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

ITN for Esther Williams

On 6 June 2013, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Esther Williams, which you recently nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

--Spencer 20:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-06-03

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 22:39, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

The Classes

Would it be alright if there was an article representing all nine playable classes/mercenaries in Team Fortress 2? -Kingpinn2 (talk) 02:03, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

No, they are not notable outside of the game for a separate article. --MASEM (t) 02:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Deadmau5

Hey Masem, I just wanted to ask you for a quick clarification on a point you made in the MOS:TM talk page. "If there are two or more styles that exist for a name where one style is the popular albeit non-standard means of spelling." What do you mean by existing? i.e. being used once? I only ask because for the deadmaus/deadmau5 example, there's really not even a comparison between how often each is used. The former is not just unpopular, but is basically never used and is probably only used by mistake. "deadmau5" returns 20,100,000 google hits and 1,720 google news hits and 110 google scholar hits, while "deadmaus" returns 296,000 google hits, 3 news hits, and 7 scholar hits. In other words, "deadmaus" it's basically used less often than a misspelling would be used. I think this stands in stark contrats to the Se7en/Seven example, where the spelling was used interchangeably (in fact, even dvds and posters used "seven" . I just wanted to make sure that you weren't being misled by a notion that there's two common names and that the debate is the choice between a slightly less popular name without the numbers vs. a slightly more popular name with a #. Capscap (talk) 20:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

I have a hard time believing that 296,000 google hits are from typos, and even with the ~ 100:1 split, no one is outright confusing "deadmaus" with another entity. Yes, the Se7en/Seven parallel is a lot closer, but my idea would still apply to deadmau5/deadmaus. --MASEM (t) 21:02, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Comics Books Question

Is the two IDW My Little Pony Comic Books Series the only Hasbro related that is for all ages and appropriate for young children? If not than what are the other one?184.20.209.241 (talk) 01:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Revised addition to Xbox Kinect Overview

Xbox One gets to know you. It learns what you like and what you don’t. And brings it all together on your own personal home screen. And because every Xbox One comes with Kinect, it responds naturally to your voice, movements, and gestures. The Xbox one kinect can scan through clothes to gain information about your muscle tension and reflexes for a seamless gaming experience. The kinect sensor detects when you are smiling, crying, angry, or bored. Every detail of your face is recorded to gain an insight into your likely mood. Even your heartbeat is measured. Your motions can be seen in the dark. Explosiveoxygen (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)EXOExplosiveoxygen (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

No part of this is personal opinion. It's all sourced and can be traced back to microsoft statements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Explosiveoxygen (talk • contribs)

What you are doing is called synthesis. There are some facts in here - that's fine. But you're coming to conclusions about the impliciations of these features that invade a user's privacy that cannot be made without evoking original research or creating a non-neutral point of view. If other reliable sources discuss privacy issues involving these features of the kinect, that may be a case to include, but you as the editor cannot make that. --MASEM (t) 22:41, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

1 I did not write anything which is not confirmed by Microsoft at the xbox one + kinect overview on their page.

2 Which conclusions did I reach? I stated facts.

How is saying that the kinect sensor scans your emotions and can detect and intuit your body movements using infrared a conclusion? How is kinect gaining information about your smiling and emotions an opinion??

3 Did you even read the articles cited? They come to conclusions which I omitted. I could source you the XBOX one homepage for all of these statements, will you then stop removing my edit?

Ex, first off, you need to sign your posts. Its against policy not to and it makes it hard to read your comments. With regard to Masem's edits, the way you've written the section is what makes it suspicious of synthesis as well as copyright violation in my opinion. Its not a very encyclopedic tone or style, its just casual prose. I read your last posting and assumed you had lifted it word for word until I then read the original blog. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 23:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Yea, it is not encyclopedic in tone and written like promo material. The facts may be correct, but you're writing to say "hey, the kinect does all these things - you should worry about your privacy even if you aren't saying that last part. Calling it "critism" is not appropriate. This information could be written in an encyclopedic tone to say that the new Kinect for the Xbox One has the ability to read facial emotions and the like as part of its feature set, but unless another source connects it to a privacy issue, that connection can't be made. --MASEM (t) 23:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

You keep assuming these conclusions which are not written in my edit.

I'm going to make another version of my edit and if you guys keep removing it then you are in fact guilty of bias in hiding the statistics of what a kinect can or can't do.

Criticism is a fine heading, I will gladly rename it or move it to another section if this helps you sleep at night. You are so being biased and then accusing me of it.

Whatever you think is a conclusion is based entirely from your opinion, I did not write those things even in the first version last week which had you guys censor me.

What happened to free wikipedia? Your willingness to censor information is disgusting and you guys are killing the idea of wikipedia being neutral with your bias while claiming you are neutral.

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 23:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)ExplosiveOxygenExplosiveoxygen (talk) 23:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

You're taking this as a combative situation, that will not help if you continue to edit war.

Second, do realize that much of what you have added is already covered at Kinect#Kinect_on_the_Xbox_One; the only things that your additions include are elements that are related to privacy. Sure, you aren't explicitly saying "this is a privacy issue" but the tone it takes screams that, and why it is being removed. Consider what is already present and that your additions are simply duplicating this. --MASEM (t) 23:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

My edit is an addition, why would I modify the words others have written with their sources?

It needs to be on the xbox one page and well visible, not hidden away in other articles.

Kinect is not separate from Xbox One and so your biased opinion is once again showing when you say that What I wrote is duplicated.

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 00:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)EXOExplosiveoxygen (talk) 00:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Again, the fundamental details of what you are trying to add is already present on both the Xbox One and Kinect page. The tone of what you're adding is begging for interpretation. This is not necessary and thus if you add it again, you will likely be blocked again. If you want to get more input, start a talk section on one of those two articles, but I will tell you as you are adding it, that is not appropriate text prose for WP. --MASEM (t) 00:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)EXOExplosiveoxygen (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

It seems once again that you are assuming some opinion is present "begging for interpretation". That is your subjective claim.

Telling me I will be blocked? I don't just readd the same edit, this is clearly a personal attack so stop telling me I am taking a "combative" mode.

I have modified my words several times and changed the sentences as well as added or removed certain bits. I am not simply "readding".

My edit is neutral toned, you may need to have a discussion with others instead of assuming yourself "Edit Dictator" and claiming you are always right.

You are most especially wrong when claiming there is some bias or opinion going on. It seems you understand as well as I do that what I add is not "duplicated" so you try to list a number of reasons to bolster your claim. All of which are lies and appear intentional.

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 00:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

• • "Xbox One gets to know you. It learns what you like and what you don’t." - What does this mean? This is marketing speak, for all purposes. And in fact, there's little on the MS page to suggest this. So that's original research. "Also, Your motions can be seen in the dark." The source does not actually say this at all. It says it works better in low-light situations. Given that you wanted this under a "Criticism" section, the slate implies a privacy issue, hence why it is not appropriate. Neither of these addresses the tone of voice; we don't use "you"-type constructions, and because of the way you write it, it is implicitly warning the user about these issues. Add that both articles cover all the details we know of the new Kinect to sufficient degree from what MS has stated, there's really no need to add anything else. --MASEM (t) 00:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Please also understand what a personal attack is. Claiming you are making this a battlefield is not a personal attack. Calling me an edit dictator is. --MASEM (t) 00:33, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 01:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)EXO01:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Explosiveoxygen (talk)

Oh wow now I am convinced you are intentionally lying.

"Xbox One gets to know you. It learns what you like and what you don't." is what microsoft claims. The kinect sensor learns about you to better understand your expressionless face as well as to remember when you showed disapproval. This is referenced. It is on the xbox one site.

"Motions can be seen in the dark" Is actually also on the Microsoft website.

What I wanted it under earlier, which was a completely different sentence structure, has no bearing on how this neutrality-confirmed information is presented now. This is again you showing bias.

I'm not even sure what your last bit of ranting is supposed to mean. That's a quote from Microsoft, hence the reference. The information I am adding is not present in the article, I am adding it for a full overview of the Xbox One.

http://www.xbox.com/en-CA/xboxone/meet-xbox-one

Search "gets to know you"

http://www.xbox.com/en-CA/xboxone/what-it-is

Search "see in the dark"

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 01:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)EXO01:10, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Explosiveoxygen (talk)

While those are now direct quotes from MS, they also remain filled with hyperbole. Given these are coming off of their marketing pages and not their technical specifications, how exaggerated these claims are are questionable. Take the "see in the dark" claim. Mashable articles, accurately, states that it has been sensing in low-light situations. That's not the same as "seeing in the dark" from at technical claim but to a consumer, that could be taken to mean that. This is why using marketing pages to support these claims is also making these additions problematic.

Further, again, the style is completely wrong for an encyclopedia in addition to begging a biased view. "It can see in the dark" is really saying "The Kinect has an IR sensor that can detect motion in low-light situtaions". "Gets to know you", really means that the sensor has facial recognizition to track users, and keeps a history of what you have done with the unit as to make suggestions. The thing is, these details are already in both articles, and thus you still aren't adding anything new. You're pushing these as criticism but without being able to say "these are bad" and that's not really acceptable. --MASEM (t) 01:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

01:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)Explosiveoxygen (talk)EXOExplosiveoxygen (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Then someone must have fabricated a fake video on Wired where the capabilities are tested. It literally requires no light to see you. Low light situations is from the old kinect 1.0 not this version.

Watch this exclusive look at how it works, I can reference you the time if you are unable to notice where it shows the darkness vision.

The rest of your post is a moot argument. I will make a nice new page, you will play nice and use the talk feature on my nice new page and when you attempt to delete it, you will be reported. You've repeatedly shown bias so don't think yourself immune from reprimands.

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)EXOExplosiveoxygen (talk) 01:29, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

You still don't understand - everything you basically are trying to add is already present in the articles, and in a much more neutral tone. You posted talk page requests on the two pages as pushing for reception or criticism section. These have zero to do with that facet of the device , they are technical details already present. You have already shown in the past you want to add these as part of the criticism of the device but either you have sources that say that is a problem (which you haven't shown) or otherwise making that up on your own making it original research and biased writing. Consider what is already present and what you're trying to add and understand that you're simply replicating already-existing details. If you make a new pages about criticism of the unit, it will be deleted since we don't allow for biased articles. --MASEM (t) 01:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

→:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hi5kMNfgDS4

Vid I meant to link above, check it.

§

My writing is quoting Microsoft. How is that biased?

How is my tone not neutral when I am directly quoting the facts?

What does my previous edit have to do with my current edit? It's been rewritten and I am not pushing for a new subsection.

Which original research? You have yet to even say where this is that I have done this, being ambiguous isn't helping. What's wrong? Can't admit that you are completely wrong on this issue?

Show my sentence by sentence how all the information I put up is not in the article?

Make up your mind, how is a public disapproval of the capabilities of the Xbox One not a reception? I even put up definitions for you.

Why is it so hard to answer all my questions? (This one is rhetorical) How come you keep harping on non-issues that are in the past. Didn't you say I shouldn't be making it personal? Then why are you? Previous edits have no bearing on the veracity of the current edits.

Prepare yourself for some fun, this type of passive aggressive behavior, constantly lying about what I did and then trying to say I'm causing problems will not be tolerated.

I hope you have other IP and other wikipedia accounts, your reputation is building itself to represent a liar and a hypocrite.

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 01:57, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)That's enough of the name-calling. You've received your final warning for personal attacks on your talk page. If you cannot have a civilized discussion with Masem, it would be best if you did not interact with them. --McDoobAU93 02:02, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 02:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

A hypocrite and a liar is not name calling when the person is being asked to stop performing the actions in question-

Specifically, saying something I did not say, and then telling me not to be biased while removing neutral content.

You are now engaged in bias. Why?

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 02:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Ex, its really unfortunate that you don't understand that we're trying to help you. The Manual of Style exists for a reason. WP is still very much an open project and community, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have standards that we all have to adhere to and arguing with more experienced editors doesn't help your situation.

Not sharing your exact opinion doesn't make us biased nor does it mean we are trying to censor anything. Trust me when I say that we very much want your help and contributions. But you might want to take into consideration that any opinion that you find in a blog or other editorial online or elsewhere that you happen to agree with does not necessarily belong in Misplaced Pages. Neutral point of view is concept and principle that is taken very seriously on this site. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 05:15, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 07:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Look guys, getting your friends to join in and support your opinion doesn't make your bias more neutral or objective. You are repeating lies which I have been accused of and I have already responded to them and discredited them. When all someone can do is repeat several lies and switch out which one they are going to repeat while ignoring all responses, they have become emotionally distressed. At that point it is no longer a discussion. Someone randomly jumping into the discussion and repeating that tactic does in fact not make the false argument any more credible. It would be nice if you guys let the drama go, my information has been included. I have won.

Explosiveoxygen (talk) 07:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

"Won"? Wow, you really don't seem to get Misplaced Pages's purpose yet. I'm sure you'll figure it out eventually, its a process that everyone goes through. --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 13:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

My Little Pony Comics Book Series

Why I can not add what I put on the My Little Pony Friendship is Magic Comic Books Series page? I did this because I am upset at the Comments that Ghostkaiba297 put on the My Little Pony Friendship is Magic Wiki. Don't you know that that the 2ND story arc will end with a happy ending? It will end with a happy ending. A true My Little Pony fan would know that.The Publicity summary for the Nightmare Rarity ARC said see how the Magic of Friendship prevails in the start of a brand new story arc imply that it will end with a happy ending.Having it end with the bad guy winning, Rarity staying as Nightmare Rarity forever,The Ponies staying in a prison for the rest of their lives and Equestria and maybe the whole world geting destroy is too sad and dark for a children comic books series.The two IDW My Little Pony Comic Books Series take place in the same Universe as the cartoon It will end with the evil Nightmare Forces of the moon getting defeated and Nightmare Rarity turning back into Rarity. Then the six Ponies and Spike will go back home. That is a happy ending. You know that it will end with a happy ending right?184.20.209.241 (talk) 04:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

We don't care what is said at other wikis. The show and the series are intended for children, but that doesn't mean they are sappy endings. This should be plainly obvious and if you continue to try to beg the question if the show or comics are really intended for children, you will likely be blocked for being disruptive. --MASEM (t) 04:20, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

It will end with a happy ending right Masem?184.20.209.241 (talk) 11:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The two IDW My Little Pony comic book series

The two IDW My Little Pony Comic Books Series are not for kids. They are for adults not children. It meant for the Bronies only. Is this true or false?184.20.209.241 (talk) 00:08, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

They are for children. They are catagorizes as children's comic books. --MASEM (t) 00:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

My Little Pony Friendship is Magic Nightmare Rarity Arc problem

Hello Masem I have a problem that is makeing me stress. There is this user named Ghostkaiba297 who think that the 2ND story Arc of the My Little Pony Friendship is Magic IDW Comic Books Series will end with a dark and unhappy ending. A guy named Chris seem to think the same way too. But that is not true. This guy see the two IDW My Little Pony Comic Books Series as canon. But I see the two IDW My Little Pony Comic Books Series as canon and take place in the same Universe as the cartoons. They are canon and take place in the same universe as the cartoon The 2ND Story Arc is not going to end with a very dark and unhappy ending. This is My Little Pony not Neon Genesis Evangelion. This is a children comic books series. Having it end with the bad guys winning,having the six Ponies and Spike being imprisoned for the rest of their live,Rarity staying as Nightmare Rarity forever,All of Equestria and maybe the whole world getting destroy and getting cover in darkness forever and killing off Princess Celestia and Princess Luna is too dark for a children comics books series. I have a feeling and I know that it will end with a happy ending. The Publicity summary for the Nightmare Rarity ARC said see how the Magic of Friendship prevails in the start of a brand new story arc imply that it will end with a happy ending. It will end with the That is a happy ending. That why I am stress. What should I do about this? You know it will end with a happy ending right? What should I do? Are they just opinions I should just ignore? Should I ignore user named Ghostkaiba297 and his comment?184.20.209.241 (talk) 02:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Please stop asking me these questions. You've been told several times they are children's books. --MASEM (t) 02:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

I know that the two IDW My Little Pony Comic Books Series is for children. I want to know if it is extremely likely that the 2ND story Arc will end with a happy ending and with the evil Nightmare Forces of the moon getting defeated and Nightmare Rarity turning back into Rarity. Then the six Ponies and Spike will go back home. Those comments that Ghostkaiba297 made me want to ask this184.20.209.241 (talk) 03:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Neither Masem nor anyone you ask here on Misplaced Pages will be able to answer you. They are not involved in any way with the creation of the comic series, nor can they predict the future. Misplaced Pages is about facts and providing information about what has already happened, not opinions and speculation. You need to go to another site that has a My Little Pony forum and discuss it there. -- 140.202.10.134 (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

"Additonal" versus "Positive".

I've modified it to read "neutral". If nobody else does by the end of the day, I'll give a go at neutrally describing the initial press conference... -Kai445 (talk) 18:22, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Balanced I think is better - in that there are going to be critical sources and there need to be positive sources, and we're not really going to be able to say things neutrally - but I believe you get the point, and that's fine. --MASEM (t) 18:24, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

My Little Pony Friendship is Magic Nightmare Rarity Arc

Masem can you tell Ghostkaiba297 that the 2ND Arc of the My Little Pony Friendship is Magic end with a good and happy ending?

1. ^ Xbox Overview. "Introducing Xbox One". Microsoft. Retrieved 2013-06-09. Cite error: The named reference "XBox" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
2. Lance Ulanoff (2013-05-23). "Report:watchyourheartbeat". mashable. Retrieved 2013-05-26.
3. Lance Ulanoff (2013-05-23). "Report:watchyourheartbeat". mashable. Retrieved 2013-05-26.