Misplaced Pages

Draft:North American Invasive Species Network: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:16, 14 June 2013 editBrittneyeli (talk | contribs)36 edits References← Previous edit Revision as of 20:17, 14 June 2013 edit undoBrittneyeli (talk | contribs)36 edits AboutNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
== About == == About ==


In 1997, a letter sent to Vice-President ] co-written by Don C. Schmitz, Dr. James T. Carlton, Dr. ], and Dr. Phyllis N. Windle, and signed by more than 500 scientists, resource and agriculture officials, urged the ] to form a commission to recommend new strategies to prevent and manage ]. One of the letter’s recommendations was to form a center analogous to the ] (CDC) to help coordinate the multi-jurisdictional aspects of invasive species management in the U.S. The letter resulted in President ] issuing Executive Order 13112 on February 3, 1999, calling for the establishment of a national plan and creating the National Invasive Species Council. In 1997, a letter sent to Vice-President ] co-written by Don C. Schmitz, Dr. James T. Carlton, Dr. ], and Dr. Phyllis N. Windle, and signed by more than 500 scientists, resource and agriculture officials, urged the ] to form a commission to recommend new strategies to prevent and manage ]. One of the letter’s recommendations was to form a center analogous to the ] (CDC) to help coordinate the multi-jurisdictional aspects of invasive species management in the U.S. The letter resulted in President ] issuing Executive Order 13112<ref>United States Department of Agriculture. (2012). Invasive Species:Laws and Regulations - Executive Order 13112. Retrieved from http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/laws/execorder.shtml/ref> on February 3, 1999, calling for the establishment of a national plan and creating the National Invasive Species Council.


One of the National Invasive Species Council’s major responsibilities was the development of the National Management Plan on Invasive Species, released on January 18, 2001. The plan called for additional ] and resources for all invasive species efforts and pointed out large discrepancies in funding across affected agencies. The plan also identified problems in the current system, such as a failure to assign authorities to act in emergencies and the absence of a screening system for all intentionally introduced species. In addition, the plan called for the National Invasive Species Council to provide national leadership and oversight on invasive species issues and ensure that ] activities are coordinated, effective, work in partnership with the states, and provide public input and participation. The ] specifically directs the council to promote action at local, state, tribal, and ] levels; identify recommendations for ] cooperation; facilitate a coordinated information network on invasive species; and develop guidance on invasive species for federal agencies to use in implementing the ]. Presently, the council has a staff of seven to accomplish these tasks. Without the infrastructure, support, resources, and mechanisms to synchronize the thousands of prevention and management programs that now exist from coast to coast, the council is unlikely to be more effective at coordination than are other federal interagency groups. One of the National Invasive Species Council’s major responsibilities was the development of the National Management Plan on Invasive Species, released on January 18, 2001. The plan called for additional ] and resources for all invasive species efforts and pointed out large discrepancies in funding across affected agencies. The plan also identified problems in the current system, such as a failure to assign authorities to act in emergencies and the absence of a screening system for all intentionally introduced species. In addition, the plan called for the National Invasive Species Council to provide national leadership and oversight on invasive species issues and ensure that ] activities are coordinated, effective, work in partnership with the states, and provide public input and participation. The ] specifically directs the council to promote action at local, state, tribal, and ] levels; identify recommendations for ] cooperation; facilitate a coordinated information network on invasive species; and develop guidance on invasive species for federal agencies to use in implementing the ]. Presently, the council has a staff of seven to accomplish these tasks. Without the infrastructure, support, resources, and mechanisms to synchronize the thousands of prevention and management programs that now exist from coast to coast, the council is unlikely to be more effective at coordination than are other federal interagency groups.

Revision as of 20:17, 14 June 2013

Submission declined on 7 June 2013 by Jamesx12345 (talk).This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
  • If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
  • Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help
  • If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
  • If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
How to improve a draft

You can also browse Misplaced Pages:Featured articles and Misplaced Pages:Good articles to find examples of Misplaced Pages's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft Editor resources This draft has not been edited in over six months and qualifies to be deleted per CSD G13. Declined by Jamesx12345 11 years ago. Last edited by Brittneyeli 11 years ago. Reviewer: Inform author.This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.
  • Comment: Secondary sources needed as well. Jamesx12345 (talk) 20:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

About

In 1997, a letter sent to Vice-President Al Gore co-written by Don C. Schmitz, Dr. James T. Carlton, Dr. Daniel Simberloff, and Dr. Phyllis N. Windle, and signed by more than 500 scientists, resource and agriculture officials, urged the U.S. government to form a commission to recommend new strategies to prevent and manage invasive species. One of the letter’s recommendations was to form a center analogous to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to help coordinate the multi-jurisdictional aspects of invasive species management in the U.S. The letter resulted in President Bill Clinton issuing Executive Order 13112<ref>United States Department of Agriculture. (2012). Invasive Species:Laws and Regulations - Executive Order 13112. Retrieved from http://www.invasivespeciesinfo.gov/laws/execorder.shtml/ref> on February 3, 1999, calling for the establishment of a national plan and creating the National Invasive Species Council.

One of the National Invasive Species Council’s major responsibilities was the development of the National Management Plan on Invasive Species, released on January 18, 2001. The plan called for additional funding and resources for all invasive species efforts and pointed out large discrepancies in funding across affected agencies. The plan also identified problems in the current system, such as a failure to assign authorities to act in emergencies and the absence of a screening system for all intentionally introduced species. In addition, the plan called for the National Invasive Species Council to provide national leadership and oversight on invasive species issues and ensure that federal agency activities are coordinated, effective, work in partnership with the states, and provide public input and participation. The Executive Order specifically directs the council to promote action at local, state, tribal, and ecosystem levels; identify recommendations for international cooperation; facilitate a coordinated information network on invasive species; and develop guidance on invasive species for federal agencies to use in implementing the National Environmental Policy Act. Presently, the council has a staff of seven to accomplish these tasks. Without the infrastructure, support, resources, and mechanisms to synchronize the thousands of prevention and management programs that now exist from coast to coast, the council is unlikely to be more effective at coordination than are other federal interagency groups.

Realizing this, and after years of calling for the establishment of a National Center for Biological Invasions, Don C. Schmitz and Dr. Dan Simberloff organized a workshop in March 2010 in Florida to determine how to integrate various regional invasive species centers, institutes, laboratories, and networks established over the years in North America to help meet the needs of public conservation land and waterway resource managers regarding invasive species issues. An additional workshop was held in November 2010 in Idaho to address these same issues. Scientists, policy makers, resource managers, NGOs, educators, and information specialists from Canada, Mexico, and the U.S. attended the workshops, along with the directors, or their representatives, from regional invasive species centers, institutes, laboratories, and networks.

As a result of the November 2010 workshop, seven invasive species centers or institutes and one federally funded Canadian research network agreed to become part of the North American Invasive Species Network (NAISN). Since then, NAISN has added another Canadian member.


In 2013, eight invasive species centers and/or institutes, and one regional network are part of the North American Invasive Species Network (NAISN) either as a hub (1) or a node (2). They are:

Center/institute Regional network
Center for Invasive Species Management Montana (hub)
Center for Aquatic and Invasive Plants Florida (hub)
CONABIO Mexico (hub)
National Institute of Invasive Species Science Colorado (hub)
Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health Georgia (hub)
Invasive Species Research Institute Canada (hub)
Invasive Species Centre Canada (hub)
Canadian Aquatic Invasive Species Network Canada (node)
Geosystems Research Institute Mississippi (hub)


In 2011, NAISN was established as a non-profit organization in the United States (501(C)3) to unify and connect these existing invasive species efforts into a single network, resulting in better communication, coordination, collaboration, and cooperation in dealing with the multi-jurisdictional aspects of biological invasions in North America. Participating member organizations, groups, or individuals can participate as Hubs1, Nodes2, or Affiliates3.

Regional Network
1 Hubs are defined as entities (institutions, organizations, or groups) that coordinate invasive species management activities with a regional, international, thematic, and/or taxonomically based focus.
2 Nodes are government agencies or other organizational entities with a recognized role in the management of invasive species. Nodes may be members of a specific Hub or collaborate independently with the NAISN Board of Directors.
3 Affiliates are individuals with recognized expertise and interest in invasive species issues.

In April 2012, the third NAISN workshop was held to develop a five-year business strategic plan. A number of issues were discussed, including strategic objectives, potential demonstration projects, how to market and advertise NAISN services, engaging Native Americans/First Nations/Aboriginal peoples, and setting priorities and timelines. This five-year business strategy was developed to guide NAISN during its formative years. It is envisioned that, as NAISN grows and expands, the Network will work to enhance information exchange among scientists, government agencies, and private landowners through the use of a comprehensive website modeled after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, and the aggregation of databases from over 250 databases that contain information of invasive species currently in use worldwide. NAISN will also begin to track invasive species expenditures through annual surveys of federal, provincial, state, municipal and tribal governments and oversee a comprehensive analysis of economic impacts of invasive species; such information could readily be used by policy-makers and elected officials. Finally, NAISN will provide “one-stop shopping” for the news media and develop and implement national public awareness campaigns about invasive species in the North America.

References


Review waiting, please be patient.

This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,773 pending submissions waiting for review.


  • If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space.
  • If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here.
  • In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally.

Where to get help
  • If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
  • If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
How to improve a draft

You can also browse Misplaced Pages:Featured articles and Misplaced Pages:Good articles to find examples of Misplaced Pages's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft Editor resources
Reviewer tools
  • Warning: The page North American Invasive Species Network already exists. Please ensure it is not a copy or that this page is located to the correct title.
  • Categories: