Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:48, 15 June 2013

Stress (mechanics)

Hi, Suri 100. Welcome to Misplaced Pages. You've been adding material on virial stress to Stress (mechanics). I have two tips/requests. First, your contributions would be more valuable if they included citations of published works. Second, you seem to have stopped your editing in the middle of a sentence. If you would like to work through drafts of new material, without the obligation of finishing the material right away, there are two common methods. You can draft the material on the article's talk page; then other editors can comment on it before it is incorporated into the article. Or you can draft the material on your own user page or subpage, if you prefer to control it more tightly. Well, I hope you enjoy participating here. Mgnbar (talk) 16:30, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Bhopal disaster

Please do not delete large tracts of text without giving an adequate reason. Here is some information you might find helpful;

Welcome...

Hello, Suri 100, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• How to edit a page
• Help
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.  Again, welcome! SpinningSpark 07:40, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The problem with your signature is that it does not include a link to your user page or talk page (the standard signature has links to both). At least one link is a Misplaced Pages requirement - see WP:SIGLINK - and if you don't have a link bots like SineBot will fail to recognise it as a signature. You have probably caused this problem inadvertently by checking the "Treat the above as wiki markup" in your preferences. If you check this box you need to insert the links in your signature manually as the signature will now be treated literally by the software. However, if you just want your signature to be your username (as it currently is) you don't really need to be making a custom signature. You can just leave the signature box blank, uncheck the box, and the software will automatically generate the standard signature. SpinningSpark 18:36, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Indian Army

I saw you were trying to request unprotection. I've fixed the request for you, and unprotected the article. Regards, GedUK  14:06, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

re Incremental service awards

Hi Suri 100. You deleted these, or at any rate blanked them by converting them to a redirect. I don't see this as a particularly good idea or especially friendly to the editor who went to the trouble of creating them. Also there is and was an open discussion at the WP:SERVICE with supporting merge templates. I'm sure you didn't see these or you wouldn't have done that, so just letting you know. I have userfied these for the time being. Herostratus (talk) 20:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

My stand is simply that it's not your decision to make on your own, is all. There's an active discussion ongoing. Herostratus (talk) 02:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Your welcome template on ClueBot Commons talk page

Hello

Just to let you know that there was no need for a welcome template to be left on ClueBot NG's talk page. Firstly because ClueBot NG is a robot and therefore doesn't actually make any real edits to articles and secondly, even if ClueBot NG was a person it has been around for coming up for 4 years in one form or another, and templates like that should only go to people who either aren't experienced in editing or have only just joined. You can tell how long someone has been editing Misplaced Pages, how many edits they've made etc by making a slight change in your preferences. To do this, click on the 'my preferences' and then on the 'gadgets' section. Put a tick in the third box down for navigation popups, article previews etc and save your changes. The next time you hover over a link to ClueBot NG's page it will tell you how long that particular bot has been editing Misplaced Pages, what position it holds, how many edits it has made etc etc. Any questions feel free to ask me on my talk page.--5 albert square (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your message.I initially unknowingly put welcome template on that page,but afterwards , I reverted it. Suri 100 (talk) 15:31, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

JamesBWatson (talk) 13:05, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Espionage

please restore the section 'The Law and Espionage'. it was well referenced, notable, and relevant. Decora (talk) 02:49, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

and yes i realize Gerstein doesnt use the word 'espionage act of 1917', but that is what 'disclosure of classified information' means. i dont think that is original research, and i could find other articles that use the word 'espionage' specifically, but Gerstein's is the best becasue he has brought all the cases together in one analysis. Decora (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

the other part of that section linked directly to the court files of the accused (ames for example). Decora (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

I have restored most of the text that was there under section 'the law and espionage' to the 'Risks ' section.Suri 100 (talk) 13:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

thanks. Decora (talk) 13:43, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Margaret Thatcher

I have reverted your edit of the infobox on Margaret Thatcher's article. I did this because the dates below the title clearly indicate she's no longer the Prime Minister, so having the word "Former" in the title is redundant. Furthermore, when a person is occupying the title in the present-sense, the word "incumbent" is automatically listed below. The fact this word did not appear further states to the reader that she is no longer the Prime Minister. In addition, there is no such title as "Former Prime Minister" within the British political system, and infobox title areas are reserved for concrete titles. Lastly, please look at every other political infobox, and you'll see that we never use the word "Former". I thought to make you aware of these reasons so as to avoid future problems. Thank you, and happy editing. Franklinville (talk) 01:28, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

You are always welcome and and an happy editing to you too.I suggest that your user page be presentable as it is blank. Suri 100 (talk) 07:36, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice - I've always be meaning to get round to improving my page. Franklinville (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Rice and curry

OK, 10 days now. No sign of any discussion at all there Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Villages

I'm afraid you're quite mistaken on this edit. The context was clear, and the article absolutely qualifies to stay. - Philippe 08:15, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

The article is very short and does not have importance.Please expand if you can.Please note that the article is of no importance and it is more like a dictionary.Thank you. Happy years of editing! Suri 100 (talk) 08:20, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

I think that if you take a look, you'll find that precedent is strongly on the side of inclusion of towns. They're typically well covered in secondary sources. Rather than having it deleted, why not try to improve it? Several administrators have declined that now. - Philippe 08:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Please slow down

Please, familiarise yourself with Misplaced Pages's notability criteria. Your deletion-spree isn't accomplishing anything other than annoying people who have to clean up after you—"too short" and "not enough references" are grounds for improving articles, not deleting them. 212.74.97.205 (talk) 04:01, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your advice.I shall follow your point seriously.I think what I did was wrong. Suri 100 (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

I must agree with the IP concern above. I noticed your prod rationale at Vladimir Galkin: "The article is too short .The article lacks sufficient context." The context is quite clear, and the brevity of the article shouldn't be a reason for deletion. We call short articles "stubs" and they are perfectly valid, as far as I know. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 14:08, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

I have removed the deletion notice on that article.Sorry for discomfort. Suri 100 (talk) 12:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Good to meet a fellow wikipedian from chennai. -SubashChandran ׀ sign! 04:48, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

I am glad for meeting you.Suri 100 (talk) 03:20, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

To welcome you back :) 5 albert square (talk) 16:18, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks.Suri 100 (talk) 03:13, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Indian presidential election, 2012

Hello Suri 100. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Indian presidential election, 2012, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:05, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

This article is too short and contains only one line.In fact ,it cant be called as an article if i am not mistaken.Suri 100 (talk) 12:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

You are very much mistaken. Though it is short, it has enough information to identify the subject of the article, and in addition has links demonstrating its notability. Given that the page is two years old and has been edited by several admins, the speedy nom is particularly ill-advised. Nikkimaria (talk) 12:42, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

You are qualified

Hello, Suri 100. This is to notify you that you have been enrolled in the Counter Vandalism academy. If you have any questions, doubts, concerns, feel free to contact me, and I'm ready. I'd take a few tests to ensure that you're up to the mark or not. Thanks for your contributions, and great to have you! Dipankan 15:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Please take a moment to complete the questions here. Thanks. Dipankan 15:33, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for enrolling me .I have answered your questions.I came to know about the academy from your user page.It is also great for me to have Indian Wikipedians like you.Suri 100 (talk) 06:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I reviewed your answers, and found it was correct. Congratulations, you've passed the test with a good grade. And answer to Q3. was great. Any doubt, just ping me, and I'll be ready. Thanks. Dipankan 06:26, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

What is use of three revert rule (3RR)if the user is not engaging in edit-war?. Already the user will be blocked if he engages in edit war even if he does not violate the 3RR rule so what is the use of this rule?Suri 100 (talk) 08:10, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

"Not engaging in edit war"- means probably they are fighting vandalism, which is excluded from the 3RR. A edit war tends to be severe - many reverts in a day. To minimize that, 3RR had been set up, so once a user reverts more than 3 times in one day in a single page with this own thought, (much of arguing with other editors), admins block users, leaving a dirty note (Blocked messages) on the talk page. So this is the purpose of 3RR. Did you get it? Dipankan 11:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I got it.ThanksSuri 100 (talk) 11:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Coming back to visit. Any problem with vandalism or such? Ping me, alright? Dipankan 15:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

No problem as of now.Yes I would contact you if there is a problem.Suri 100 (talk) 11:40, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

ClueBot NG

Hello! Can I ask, why you made this edit and turned the anti-vandal bot off?--5 albert square (talk) 21:23, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry I did this purposefully in a bad intention of vandalism,in fact soon after that edit however I thought to revert my own edit but it was already reverted by other user.The previous edit by me in this bot page was also in that intention of vandalism which you misunderstood that I tried to put a welcome template on the talk page.

My nonconstructive edits on this page has caused a lot of inconvenience to you and other fellow wikipedians ,I am again seriously sorry for that.I shall not do that again failing which you are free to take any action against me including block or ban.Suri 100 (talk) 08:07, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

You are supposed to be helping to counter vandalism! Turning off Cluebot is about the least helpful thing you could possibly do. It must raise suspicions that you were planning some vandalism and hoped to prevent it being detected. As your edit was promptly reverted no harm has been done, but take this as an only warning: if you do anything like that again, you will get a long block. JohnCD (talk) 20:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't know why, I was off, but I'm really pissed off to see that you'd turned off the bot. Why? Please, no testing. It's a very serious matter. Dipankan 16:34, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I wont do like that ever again.Suri 100 (talk) 05:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Have some tea, get ready to fight vandalism! Dipankan 16:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Suri 100 (talk) 05:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to President of India may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:35, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Google Earth

I really want to thank you for your help there. I feel it may be too early to relist it as a GA nominee, but I'm not sure. -- Numbermaniac _(C) 08:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

See, any GA nomination can be re -listed if the reasons for rejecting the previous are fixed.Or, if there was a mistake from the reviewer. There is no time bar for re -listing ,so you can very well re-list it.Suri 100 (talk) 09:03, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll have to take a look at the page and the GA info pages. :) -- Numbermaniac _(C) 03:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Health and Morals of Apprentices Act 1802

Hi Suri 100. Thanks so much for taking the time to look at the article, I really apprciate it. I believe you're quite new to reviewing good articles, have you looked at many other reviews? Generally they're a little bit more thorough in explaining what has been checked, as well as suggesting any improvements. It's fine if you couldn't find anything more, but it's always helpful to know what's been reviewed. If it helps, have a look at the last few GA reviews I've had. Talk:Richard_Rennison/GA1, Talk:North Pier, Blackpool/GA1, Talk:Pasty/GA1, Talk:Squab pie/GA1. Thanks again for reviewing - I hope you don't mind writing a bit more! Worm(talk) 11:11, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

The article is beautifully written (Manual of Style), but i suggest that lead section could still be expanded ("maligant fever" maybe). And also thanks for guiding me. Suri 100 (talk) 11:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Have you considered filling in one of the GA templates? They will make your reviews look a lot more professional. Misplaced Pages:Good article nominations/templates for a list. You could update Talk:Health and Morals of Apprentices Act 1802/GA1 with one... Worm(talk) 11:43, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

 Done Suri 100 (talk) 11:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

thanks :D Worm(talk) 11:57, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

GAN of President of India

Hi, I have started the review of the article and comments are in talk:President of India/GA1. Ssriram mt (talk) 01:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Replied in the review page.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:29, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your review of Bahrain health worker trials! Much appreciated. -- Khazar2 (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

You and your partner Mohammed CJ should really really be appreciated for bringing that article to GA article. You and your partner were tirelessly working from its creation to present. I see that barnstars are not enough to appreciate you and your partner. Suri 100 (talk) 12:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thank you for reviewing Antonio Cárdenas Guillén! ComputerJA (talk) 07:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Tirunelveli

Hi, thanks a lot for taking up the review of Tirunelveli. The last time it was nominated, it failed because of copy-edit. It was done with the help of user:Miniapolis - I will share the credits with him.Ssriram mt (talk) 00:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Review of Aston Martin DB9

Hello. While I greatly appreciate your review of Aston Martin DB9, I intend to bring the article to to FAC and am concerned that the article has more issues than your GA review revealed. I've requested a reassessment. Thanks. Superflat Monogram 19:31, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your reviews

I just checked your last few reviews, and it doesn't look like you reviewed any of them at all. You just said they were good and moved on. If you found no issues on multiple consecutive reviews, that's generally a good indicator that you're reviewing improperly. I ask that you stop, at least for now, and read up on other reviews to see how it's done. In the meantime we'll go through the recent reviews and try to undo the damage. Wizardman 19:39, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

As an addendum, your reviews from May seem okay, it's just the ones from the past couple days. No idea why you stopped leaving comments... Wizardman 19:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

I had thoroughly read the articles before passing the articles as GA, but i didnt add any comments in some of the articles as i felt there were no issues. If there are any issues, i would myself make the edits on the article if they are within my scope. Also, i didnt pass the articles University of British Columbia and Aston Martin DB9 in which the former is a article of high importance. Suri 100 (talk) 05:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

I admit that I am new in reviewing this GA articles, but even then i am careful in passing the articles as GA. Also please dont use the term 'damages' in this context as I have not done these with bad intention. Suri 100 (talk) 13:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Misplaced Pages again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --John (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

What on earth are you doing? Why are you moving archived RfAs all over the place? Pol430 talk to me 14:18, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 14:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Do not move any more pages. Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC)