Revision as of 22:42, 5 July 2013 editMatthewVanitas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers120,868 edits →Decline at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Grand Ocean, Saltdean: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:47, 7 July 2013 edit undoSallymaypie (talk | contribs)138 edits →AFC ReviewsNext edit → | ||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Hi there, | Hi there, | ||
I have reverted your recent accept of ]. It is clearly not yet ready for mainspace. I would recommend getting more experience editing Misplaced Pages before moving into AFC reviewing. Thanks, ] (]) 12:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC) | I have reverted your recent accept of ]. It is clearly not yet ready for mainspace. I would recommend getting more experience editing Misplaced Pages before moving into AFC reviewing. Thanks, ] (]) 12:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
I really don't get it. It's a notable story. They made New York Times and NPR headlines and made a video with Judah Friedlander. What's the problem with the submission? | |||
== Decline at ] == | == Decline at ] == |
Revision as of 00:47, 7 July 2013
Chat with Techatology
AFC Reviews
Hi there, I have reverted your recent accept of Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation. It is clearly not yet ready for mainspace. I would recommend getting more experience editing Misplaced Pages before moving into AFC reviewing. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC) I really don't get it. It's a notable story. They made New York Times and NPR headlines and made a video with Judah Friedlander. What's the problem with the submission?
Decline at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Grand Ocean, Saltdean
Hello, can you leave the originator a clearer explanation of what your concerns are? S/he's pretty close to being ready, don't want to discourage without offering suggestions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)