| Revision as of 00:47, 7 July 2013 editSallymaypie (talk | contribs)138 edits →AFC Reviews← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:05, 7 July 2013 edit undoHuon (talk | contribs)Administrators51,324 edits →Your review of Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Josh T. Ryan (2): new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Hello, can you leave the originator a clearer explanation of what your concerns are? S/he's pretty close to being ready, don't want to discourage without offering suggestions. ] (]) 22:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC) | Hello, can you leave the originator a clearer explanation of what your concerns are? S/he's pretty close to being ready, don't want to discourage without offering suggestions. ] (]) 22:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Your review of ] == | |||
| Could you please explain ? While the draft certainly wasn't ready for the mainspace, I wouldn't say NPOV was the worst problem (as opposed to a lack of coverage in ]), and even if it had been, that's not grounds for blanking and speedy deletion. ] (]) 05:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:05, 7 July 2013
Chat with Techatology
AFC Reviews
Hi there, I have reverted your recent accept of Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Philippine Association of Colleges and Universities Commission on Accreditation. It is clearly not yet ready for mainspace. I would recommend getting more experience editing Misplaced Pages before moving into AFC reviewing. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2013 (UTC) I really don't get it. It's a notable story. They made New York Times and NPR headlines and made a video with Judah Friedlander. What's the problem with the submission?
Decline at Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Grand Ocean, Saltdean
Hello, can you leave the originator a clearer explanation of what your concerns are? S/he's pretty close to being ready, don't want to discourage without offering suggestions. MatthewVanitas (talk) 22:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)
Your review of Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Josh T. Ryan (2)
Could you please explain this review? While the draft certainly wasn't ready for the mainspace, I wouldn't say NPOV was the worst problem (as opposed to a lack of coverage in reliable sources), and even if it had been, that's not grounds for blanking and speedy deletion. Huon (talk) 05:05, 7 July 2013 (UTC)