| Revision as of 17:37, 1 June 2006 editRenyD (talk | contribs)11 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:38, 1 June 2006 edit undoFormeruser-82 (talk | contribs)15,744 edits Pecher, it's not necessary to vote when you're the mover. This only encourages your vote to be counted twice.Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ===]=== | ===]=== | ||
| Non-notable term and a POV-fork of ]. It is interesting to observe that contrary to ]'s view that "sexual apartheid" refers to LGBT issues, while "gender apartheid" refers to discrimination of women, the sources do not support it. For example, this ''Washington Post'' article refers to discrimination of women in Saudi Arabia as "sexual apartheid". In a nutshell, we have no reliable sources discussing teh term and confirming its notability. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | Non-notable term and a POV-fork of ]. It is interesting to observe that contrary to ]'s view that "sexual apartheid" refers to LGBT issues, while "gender apartheid" refers to discrimination of women, the sources do not support it. For example, this ''Washington Post'' article refers to discrimination of women in Saudi Arabia as "sexual apartheid". In a nutshell, we have no reliable sources discussing teh term and confirming its notability. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' as nom. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' as nom. ] <sup>]</sup> 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) (Vote by nominator, should only be counted once) | ||
| *'''Delete''' Crap article by a user (who has been blocked from editing multiple times) trying to prove a ]. -- ] 15:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' Crap article by a user (who has been blocked from editing multiple times) trying to prove a ]. -- ] 15:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Delete'''. Homeontherange obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- ] | ] 15:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete'''. Homeontherange obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- ] | ] 15:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 17:38, 1 June 2006
Gender apartheid
Non-notable term and a POV-fork of sexism. It is interesting to observe that contrary to Homeontherange's view that "sexual apartheid" refers to LGBT issues, while "gender apartheid" refers to discrimination of women, the sources do not support it. For example, this Washington Post article refers to discrimination of women in Saudi Arabia as "sexual apartheid". In a nutshell, we have no reliable sources discussing teh term and confirming its notability. Pecher 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as nom. Pecher 14:19, 1 June 2006 (UTC) (Vote by nominator, should only be counted once)
- Delete Crap article by a user (who has been blocked from editing multiple times) trying to prove a WP:POINT. -- Kicking222 15:16, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Homeontherange obviously created this term so that he could justify creating a obviously pov disambiguation page.- Moshe Constantine Hassan Al-Silverburg | Talk 15:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Transwiki to Wiktionary? Xyrael 16:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - term is used widely, see external links. Mover is presenting AFD to try to prove a point since he doesn't like the phrase Israeli apartheid. Article refers to both gender apartheid and sexual apartheid as synonyms but attempts to disambiguate between two differing meanings of the phrase "sexual apartheid". I would support moving this article to Sexual apartheid (gender) (in order to disambig from the LGBT meaning) if that will satisfy Pecher as per hiw Washington Post citation.Homey 16:38, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Jayjg 17:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - no value RenyD 17:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)