Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tewfik/Archive 2: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Tewfik Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:03, 31 May 2006 editTazmaniacs (talk | contribs)25,976 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 18:23, 1 June 2006 edit undoAriel C (talk | contribs)19 edits []Next edit →
Line 33: Line 33:


:Hello! Would you be nice to explain me what you meant by your comment on vote page? I'm not sure having well understood, thanks. Regards, ] 21:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC) :Hello! Would you be nice to explain me what you meant by your comment on vote page? I'm not sure having well understood, thanks. Regards, ] 21:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

Sholom. ] 18:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:23, 1 June 2006

Archive

Feel free to leave comments and criticism here:

Re:

You wrote:

Hi, ditto on user: 207.165.158.3. He's vandalised two articles since being banned, including a potentially racist statement. Tewfik 15:47, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I would put a notice of this on WP:VIP or WP:AIAV, whichever is necessary, if you have not already done so. :-) --Zsinj 17:02, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Herodium

You should go ahead with the merge on Herodium. There's no point waiting for more votes. Also, you shouldn't delete your old talk pages - it would be advisable to restore what you have deleted. Archive them if you want, but it's considered very inappropriate to delete discussion page history. It could be held against you in the future... Chag sameach, DLand 00:44, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

French Hill

I moved this from above and added the username and timestamp from history Tewfik 21:49, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Another bullshit editing job Tewfik. French Hill is not "sometimes considered" a settlement, it's always considered a settlement except by the government of Israel. Your editing is not even handed, it's biased to reflect the Israeli position, not that general consensus. Wiki standard is verifiability and I provided it for every factual statement, including international opinion on the status of French Hill, using Israeli sources in almost every case and using reputable sources in all other cases. Also now there are footnotes without links in the references, the page looks more confused. Hack work. 2006-05-16 07:59:02 — Preceding unsigned comment added by JimmyJ (talkcontribs)

Re:Efrat/a

Didn't you commend me for moving the article to Efrata just the other month? Anyway, Efrata is an official and correct spelling and therefore does not violate and Misplaced Pages policies. Neither would Efrat, although I think it's preferrable to have an article of a city name than city name, Israel or city name (municipality), because readers would search for it that way. Efrat should stay a disambiguation page because it has more than one meaning. -- Template:Country data flagicon Ynhockey 09:45, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

I also just noticed that you moved Efrat to Efrat (disambiguation). Please discuss such moves because now it's impossible to move it back without the help of an admin - and XX (disambiguation) should only be made when one of the subjects is much important than all others, which is not the case here - Ephrath is just as important as the town of Efrat/a (also keep in mind my previous comment). -- Template:Country data flagicon Ynhockey 10:14, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Just for the record, a Google search here is useless because Efrat is a fairly common personal and Biblical name and out of the first 10 Google results that I inspected, only 3 actually referred to the town Efrat. In any case, if it's so important to you, have Efrat be the town and make a dablink to Efrat (disambiguation). -- Template:Country data flagicon Ynhockey 08:44, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Jerusalem

Hi, please fix it, you seem to know better. As you may see, I rolled back several vandals and POV pushers. In my last edit, I was trying to reinstate edit by Masterpjz9. It sesms that either I or he (or both) did a sloppy job. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens 02:19, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Israeli apartheid

Hi, please vote here. --DLand 15:25, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Hello! Would you be nice to explain me what you meant by your comment on vote page? I'm not sure having well understood, thanks. Regards, Tazmaniacs 21:03, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Sholom. Ariel C 18:23, 1 June 2006 (UTC)