| Revision as of 08:54, 2 June 2006 editHaham hanuka (talk | contribs)7,394 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:55, 2 June 2006 edit undoRory096 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,325 edits →[]: replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| #'''Oppose''' Needs to learn to write a paragraph on why they believe they should be admin. Appears to believe that edit count is everything.--] 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose''' Needs to learn to write a paragraph on why they believe they should be admin. Appears to believe that edit count is everything.--] 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| #'''Oppose'''. There's no way I can support and RfA where the questions for the candidate are "gone" and are unanswered. --] <sup>]</sup> 08:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | #'''Oppose'''. There's no way I can support and RfA where the questions for the candidate are "gone" and are unanswered. --] <sup>]</sup> 08:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| #:They're not "gone," the RfA is just way malformed and never had them in the first place. --] 08:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| '''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
Revision as of 08:55, 2 June 2006
Haham hanuka
Discuss here (0/6/0) ending 07:43, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Haham hanuka (talk · contribs) – I have much experience on Misplaced Pages, have been here for more than 2 years, my previous nom was rejected just beacuse I did not write about myself enough.
My main work here is to "make Misplaced Pages looks better" - sometimes by detecting vandals and reverting them. Please give me a chance. I won't let you down. --Haham hanuka 07:43, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
I've cancelled my nomination. --Haham hanuka 08:54, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Support
Oppose
- Oppose. Malformed RfA, didn't even nom himself or accept before putting himself on the main page, and this subpage is malformed. --Rory096 07:38, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Does it make me a bad admin? --Haham hanuka 07:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. It shows you don't know much about how things are done around here, and that you won't even read the top of the RfA page telling you to read the guide to RfAs, which gives you an easy way to make an nom- on your 4th attempt! --Rory096 07:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Actually it's just the 2nd try (though you were opposed for having a malformed RfA the first time, you'd think you'd fix it this time); why is this page at 4? --Rory096 07:49, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. It shows you don't know much about how things are done around here, and that you won't even read the top of the RfA page telling you to read the guide to RfAs, which gives you an easy way to make an nom- on your 4th attempt! --Rory096 07:47, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Does it make me a bad admin? --Haham hanuka 07:45, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. The user rarely if ever uses edit summaries. Has been seem to label articles as POV without explanation (has done this on many occassions). Has attempted to close AfD discussions despite not being an admin and also involved in the discussion. Getting involved in 3RR and then using anonymous IP address rather than logons to bypass the block. I don't think behaviour like this is what we want in a admin. Sorry. Ben W Bell talk 07:53, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, fails 1FA. - Mailer Diablo 08:02, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Edit summary use and per Ben.Voice-of-All 08:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- So I'll use edit summaries, just because I didn't use it I cannot be an admin? Give me a chance! --Haham hanuka 08:15, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Needs to learn to write a paragraph on why they believe they should be admin. Appears to believe that edit count is everything.--Andeh 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. There's no way I can support and RfA where the questions for the candidate are "gone" and are unanswered. --Lord Deskana 08:48, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
- They're not "gone," the RfA is just way malformed and never had them in the first place. --Rory096 08:55, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Neutral
Comments
User's last 2000 edits.Voice-of-All 08:09, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
--Viewing contribution data for user Haham hanuka (over the 2000 edit(s) shown on this page)-- (FAQ) Time range: 127 approximate day(s) of edits on this page Most recent edit on: 8hr (UTC) -- 02, Jun, 2006 || Oldest edit on: 14hr (UTC) -- 27, January, 2006 Overall edit summary use (last 1000 edits): Major edits: 53.45% Minor edits: 27.78% Average edits per day: 15.37 (for last 500 edit(s)) Article edit summary use (last 821 edits) : Major article edits: 63.21% Minor article edits: 29.57% Analysis of edits (out of all 2000 edits shown of this page): Notable article edits (creation/expansion/rewrites/sourcing): 2% (40) Minor article edits (small content/info/reference additions): 1.35% (27) Superficial article edits (grammar/spelling/wikify/links/tagging): 55.65% (1113) Breakdown of all edits: Unique pages edited: 1127 | Average edits per page: 1.77 | Edits on top: 6.45% Significant edits (non-minor/reverts): 5.25% (105 edit(s)) Minor edits (non-reverts): 61.05% (1221 edit(s)) Marked reverts (reversions/text removal): 7.2% (144 edit(s)) Unmarked edits: 26.5% (530 edit(s)) Edits by Misplaced Pages namespace: Article: 83.3% (1666) | Article talk: 4.1% (82) User: 2.1% (42) | User talk: 4.4% (88) Misplaced Pages: 3.6% (72) | Misplaced Pages talk: 0% (0) Image: 1% (20) Template: 0.4% (8) Category: 0.5% (10) Portal: 0.25% (5) Help: 0% (0) MediaWiki: 0% (0) Other talk pages: 0.35% (7)
- See Haham hanuka's edit summary usage with Mathbot's tool.
- Count with Tool2:
Username Haham_hanuka Total edits 5839 Distinct pages edited 3526 Average edits/page 1.656 First edit 23:34, September 29, 2004 (main) 5025 Talk 152 User 151 User talk 159 Image 82 Image talk 1 Template 27 Template talk 8 Category 72 Category talk 1 Misplaced Pages 161