Misplaced Pages

User talk:KI: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:35, 3 June 2006 editKelly Martin (talk | contribs)17,726 edits blocked← Previous edit Revision as of 21:36, 3 June 2006 edit undoKI (talk | contribs)3,497 edits hahaha you blocked me??? Are you kidding me? Am I suppose to care?Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


Hi, I’m just dropping by to note that the debate in which you’re involved at the moment doesn’t seem to be going very well. Perhaps a more civil approach with a focus on the disputed object might be more productive. Have a nice day. —]<sub>]</sub> 21:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC) Hi, I’m just dropping by to note that the debate in which you’re involved at the moment doesn’t seem to be going very well. Perhaps a more civil approach with a focus on the disputed object might be more productive. Have a nice day. —]<sub>]</sub> 21:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

== Regarding your message on my talk page ==

Hi, since you seem to be unaware of it, I thought I'd point out that we do have a ] policy on Misplaced Pages. While I personally don't really care how you speak to me, using this kind of tone could very well intimidate other users, so please refrain from doing so in the future. Also, I've told you this before, but you continue to misunderstand the concept of vandalism. Good-faith edits are not vandalism. Perhaps you don't agree with what a contributor is saying, perhaps you think the quality of the contributions is not very high, but that still does not make the contributions vandalism, and your accusations of vandalism on ] are wholly unfounded. Collaborate with others to improve the quality of the edits, and if you're going to revert someone the very least you can do is to explain your reasons on the talk page. So far the only thing I've seen you do is substing vandalism templates, which is not enough. <font color="AE1C28">]</font>♫<font color="#21468B">]</font> 21:16, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

== Talk pages and civility ==

Do not swear at other users or revert warnings on your talk page. The only reason to remove anything from your talk page is blatant vandalism/personal attacks or to archive. ''']''' ]|] 21:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

==Blocked==
You have been blocked for 24 hours for persistent incivility in edit summaries and comments on talk pages. Please reflect on the need for civility in your travels on Misplaced Pages during your break. ] (]) 21:35, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:36, 3 June 2006

Hi, I’m just dropping by to note that the debate in which you’re involved at the moment doesn’t seem to be going very well. Perhaps a more civil approach with a focus on the disputed object might be more productive. Have a nice day. —xyzzyn 21:15, 3 June 2006 (UTC)