| Revision as of 13:30, 6 August 2013 editMark Arsten (talk | contribs)131,188 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Voluntary Human Extinction Movement. (TW)← Previous edit |
Revision as of 23:02, 6 August 2013 edit undoEdgth (talk | contribs)226 edits Undid revision 567398562 by Mark Arsten (talk) why is everybody so hostile to such simple edits?Next edit → |
| Line 8: |
Line 8: |
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Nice to meet you. ```]<small>]</small> 14:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC) |
|
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Nice to meet you. ```]<small>]</small> 14:52, 4 August 2013 (UTC) |
|
|} |
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
== August 2013 == |
|
|
] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. |
|
|
|
|
|
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 13:30, 6 August 2013 (UTC) |
|
