Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 13:38, 13 August 2013

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng

GITS

Made a new section about the organization of that page, please provide your input. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:25, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Question.

Hi Ryulong! Sorry if I'm disturbing, but since you made 889 edits here, maybe you are an expert, so let me ask you a question if you don't mind. When I was a kid (in 1989 or 1990) I used to watch a Japanese TV Show (through Hong Kong television), I'm not sure if it's related to Super Sentai, but there were 5 or 6 characters just like in Super Sentai, and robots as well. And the Ending song... it was those 5 or 6 characters who actually played that Ending Theme (they were jamming like a band), so I suppose they were a "band" too, or something like it. Oh, and the song were sang by the female character. Do you know something? I'm kind of "desperate" to watch that ending again :(, however since I don't know the name of the tv serie, it's difficult to find it on youtube. If you know something please let me know. Regards. --95.69.17.159 (talk) 23:06, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

This is a very good question. The only one I can think of that meets those requirements is Dekaranger but that came out 10 years after that time period. I'm not 100% sure what it could be, but if you take the ones listed on Super Sentai from before 1990 and plug them into YouTube you'll eventually find the one that jogs your memory.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:33, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Usually I'm very good at searching stuff on YouTube and etc, but not in this case. That TV series probably has nothing to do with Super Sentai... but the characters had different colours too, and there were robots. Not 100% sure but sometimes the characters were inside a robot. The only sentence I remember from that Ending theme is "Memorikariii" (something like it). Sigh, I guess I will die without hearing that song again lol. --95.69.17.159 (talk) 05:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Maybe you might be thinking of one of the Metal Hero Series, Ganbare!! Robocon, or one of the Toei Fushigi Comedy Series.—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:27, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. :) I will keep searching. When (yes, when and nor if, just trying to be optimistic) I find it, I'll let you know. o/ --95.69.17.159 (talk) 05:42, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

HOLY CRAP, I found it!!!!!!!!!!! It is Dennou Keisatsu Cybercop. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_7vNWKQ_htc ... 0:45 - "Mamorikari" (lol) ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1ZzWh19n20 ... there are more videos I guess. --95.69.17.159 (talk) 06:28, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Good :)—Ryulong (琉竜) 06:40, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Maybe I'll create the Wiki page about that actress. Is she notable enough? --95.69.67.239 (talk) 19:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I don't know.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

GA on S>A>CA>C-2013-08-08T03:36:00.000Z">

i know this may sound selfish but i was wondering if i could nominate Stand Alone Complex for GA when this topic-ban is over. I've been adding alot of info to it, mainly the other media, remerged the spin off OVAs and cleaned it from the in-universe, plus on a side fixed most of the plot. The only thing i didn't do was work on the Reception. I know this sounds INCREDIBLY selfish, but i've been working on it for a really long time, and made a significant re-organization to it. if you don't agree, that is fine.Lucia Black (talk) 03:36, 8 August 2013 (UTC)A>C"> A>C">

I'm fairly certain that this violates your topic ban.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:28, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

how? i'm not touching any of the articles relating to the topic, nor am i discussing about the topic. all i'm asking is that GA nomination could wait until the topic ban is over.Lucia Black (talk) 03:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

How does a GA nomination have anything to do with a topic ban. If it's worthy of a GA, by all means nominate it -- Tawker (talk) 03:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Bulbapedia links

Just strolling through and noticed you removed the Bulbapedia links at the bottom of the page of the lists, stating they are "not suitable". How did you decide this? Most of the sections are far from complete, and even if they were complete, a lot of readers would in fact be looking for information we don't provide, in which Bulbapedia can then expand on what we can't. If you are saying it isn't suitable as an external link for quality reasons, it has been discussed and the consensus was that it meets WP:ELNO's requirement of "substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors". Just wondering your thought process on this. Thanks, _Blake 03:58, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Considering that the site's users don't have the level of editorial control that we do when it comes to new Pokémon announcements I felt it was not in our best interests to retain the links at the current time with the recent CoroCoro "leaks" as usual.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

But that's the whole point. We aren't showing this information, so we need to link to a site that does. We aren't using it as a source, and we aren't saying it's entirely reliable information. Just that it is the best place to get more information on whatever they want. I am not sure I agree with selectively timebanning the site just because there are "leaks" going on. _Blake 04:18, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Do we need to? Or do we want to?—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:20, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

It's not like removing the links will stop people from finding the news anyways. It won't stop people from wanting to add it here. You are just blocking people from the whole of the wiki because the frontpage has information you want to ignore exists. Plus, the new information really only applies to the list of new Pokemon, but you removed the link from all lists. It seems consistent, yes, but doesn't seem fair. _Blake 04:27, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Note that I don't really care that strongly about it. I just would rather the users have access to more information then most of our garbage lists provide. I also just wanted to see what your reason for removing them was, as it was against the consensus that they belong. _Blake 04:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

They are some of the better sources, but maybe we could just link to the official website's Pokedex stuff instead? I saw a few of those links but they were malformed or whatever and not universally applied. But to be honest, I was simply tired of dealing with Black60dragon (now blocked for a month) and I was worried he may use the other sites as reasoning to push the bad sourcing from Serebii (and all the other websites quoting Serebii) that he had done earlier when it came to Horubī, Dedenne, and Mēkuru (that one's name is going to be difficult to romanize though).—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:35, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Question

I am no longer editing pages based on Power Rangers or Super Sentai on the database. Is that fair? J4lambert (talk) 22:09, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

What? Because I reverted you?—Ryulong (琉竜) 05:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

email?

is there an email i could reach you?Lucia Black (talk) 03:37, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

The one in the side bar.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:19, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

ive looked about a dozen times and i don't see where i could find it.Lucia Black (talk) 17:55, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Special:Emailuser—Ryulong (琉竜) 17:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

ok thanx. email sent.Lucia Black (talk) 19:42, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

The Phantom article...

First off, sorry about that small edit I put for Raum in the Phantom article. The main thing I want to ask you is this... how is that page looking to you? I ask because some entries for certain Phantoms are shorter than others. I'm a little put off for the quite long paragraphs of Siren and Arache that I did. So, what do you think? Do you think all info of the Phantoms should be condensed or expanded? --BrydoF1989 (talk) 08:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Condensed.—Ryulong (琉竜) 08:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Thought so. Sorry for making them too long... either I, you or someone else can reduce them to size. --BrydoF1989 (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Character list

Why haven't the list of characters been updated with entries for Yuzuru and to an extent Yamamoto yet? ~Switch On 2012~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 14:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Probably because they're not as important as Mayu. Just my guess. --BrydoF1989 (talk) 15:09, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Because I don't have time to make this shit anymore. You guys have to start updating the articles more often and then I'll clean them up according to policy. I am tired of having to update the episode lists on my own every week hours after the airing when you guys are in the US or UK or whatever and it's actually at a managable time. I have the copy-paste stuff there so everyone can do it.—Ryulong (琉竜) 16:21, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

They're pretty important at his point... Anyway, I'll write up the entries but they'll probably be not as good so I'll take you up on your offer to clean them. ~Switch On 2012~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 19:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Whatever. Just do what you think is best and I'll fix it later.—Ryulong (琉竜) 19:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your question

I don't really see a need to do anything. If their behavior gets out of hand it would be a matter for ANI. Drmies (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

WP:SUICIDE tho.—Ryulong (琉竜) 21:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Official Kodansha spelling is Leonhart. Please stop changing it. Do not listen to the fan edited wiki.

Please don't change it back. Hear me out. I bought english printed copies of the manga. These are the official spellings and they all match. Streamers like Crunchyroll as well as FUNimation and fansub groups like gg subs use this translation without the "d" as well. Do not change it back please. I assure you that this spelling is correct.

http://papermoon2.tumblr.com/post/46795590839/attack-on-titan-shingeki-no-kyojin-confirmed-official

1. http://papermoon2.tumblr.com/post/46795590839/attack-on-titan-shingeki-no-kyojin-confirmed-official