| Revision as of 20:33, 13 August 2013 editPlot Spoiler (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,551 edits old← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:10, 17 August 2013 edit undoDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,449 edits →Lia Tarachansky: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Hi, Plot Spoiler. I don't want to get into an edit war with you, but I wish you would undo at ]. While you might disagree about the reliability of some of these sources, it is not reasonable to exclude publications like ''ZMag'', the ''Washington Post'', and the ''LA Times'' without talk page discussion. Furthermore, I think it's not good witiquette to . Please restore this content for now, and we can discuss the individual sources on the article's talk page. Thanks, ] (]) 15:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC) | Hi, Plot Spoiler. I don't want to get into an edit war with you, but I wish you would undo at ]. While you might disagree about the reliability of some of these sources, it is not reasonable to exclude publications like ''ZMag'', the ''Washington Post'', and the ''LA Times'' without talk page discussion. Furthermore, I think it's not good witiquette to . Please restore this content for now, and we can discuss the individual sources on the article's talk page. Thanks, ] (]) 15:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| As much as I agree that it probably should get deleted in its current form, I don't think it quite meets A7. AfD or prod maybe? ] (]) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:10, 17 August 2013
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
deleted content at Iran–United States relations
Hi, Plot Spoiler. I don't want to get into an edit war with you, but I wish you would undo your changes at Iran–United States relations. While you might disagree about the reliability of some of these sources, it is not reasonable to exclude publications like ZMag, the Washington Post, and the LA Times without talk page discussion. Furthermore, I think it's not good witiquette to repeat a mass deletion after someone else has contested it. Please restore this content for now, and we can discuss the individual sources on the article's talk page. Thanks, groupuscule (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Lia Tarachansky
As much as I agree that it probably should get deleted in its current form, I don't think it quite meets A7. AfD or prod maybe? Daniel (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)