| Revision as of 00:10, 17 August 2013 editDaniel (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators75,429 edits →Lia Tarachansky: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:12, 17 August 2013 edit undoPmaster12 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,815 edits →Proposed deletion of Cassidy Hubbarth: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| As much as I agree that it probably should get deleted in its current form, I don't think it quite meets A7. AfD or prod maybe? ] (]) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | As much as I agree that it probably should get deleted in its current form, I don't think it quite meets A7. AfD or prod maybe? ] (]) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Proposed deletion of Cassidy Hubbarth == | |||
| What are the issues you have with this? I don't quite get what is the purpose for your disagreement. Can you explain what is the problem here? ] (]) 07:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:12, 17 August 2013
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
deleted content at Iran–United States relations
Hi, Plot Spoiler. I don't want to get into an edit war with you, but I wish you would undo your changes at Iran–United States relations. While you might disagree about the reliability of some of these sources, it is not reasonable to exclude publications like ZMag, the Washington Post, and the LA Times without talk page discussion. Furthermore, I think it's not good witiquette to repeat a mass deletion after someone else has contested it. Please restore this content for now, and we can discuss the individual sources on the article's talk page. Thanks, groupuscule (talk) 15:49, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Lia Tarachansky
As much as I agree that it probably should get deleted in its current form, I don't think it quite meets A7. AfD or prod maybe? Daniel (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Cassidy Hubbarth
What are the issues you have with this? I don't quite get what is the purpose for your disagreement. Can you explain what is the problem here? Pmaster12 (talk) 07:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC)