| Revision as of 00:38, 5 June 2006 editNMChico24 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,705 edits Criticism Section | Revision as of 03:35, 5 June 2006 edit undoRouter~enwiki (talk | contribs)253 edits →Criticism SectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Criticism Section == | == Criticism Section == | ||
| If someone volunteers to add good press to this entry that would be great, unfortunately, no one has. Criticism is crucial to getting other perspectives about this company hence this section. It should not get deleted since it is the only perspective. The Criticism section does site references. ] 03:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
| This section severely needs to be cleaned up, or at least counter-balanced with some good press the company has had. Otherwise it just sounds like someone is ranting. --] 00:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | This section severely needs to be cleaned up, or at least counter-balanced with some good press the company has had. Otherwise it just sounds like someone is ranting. --] 00:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 03:35, 5 June 2006
Criticism Section
If someone volunteers to add good press to this entry that would be great, unfortunately, no one has. Criticism is crucial to getting other perspectives about this company hence this section. It should not get deleted since it is the only perspective. The Criticism section does site references. Router 03:35, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
This section severely needs to be cleaned up, or at least counter-balanced with some good press the company has had. Otherwise it just sounds like someone is ranting. --Alan 00:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)