| Revision as of 02:40, 6 June 2006 view sourceDr.frog (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,590 editsm categories← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:02, 6 June 2006 view source Tbbooher~enwiki (talk | contribs)187 edits reverted vandalismNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| Eight studies on Juice Plus have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Three were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trials. Most of the studies were funded and co-written by the manufacturer. To date, the products that have been examined in all of the studies were Garden Blend and Orchard Blend (2 capsules of each taken daily in most of the studies), with the exception of one study on Vineyard Blend taken in combination with Garden and Orchard Blend (Plotnick et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1744-9), and one study on Juice Plus Gummies (Stewart et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1652-7). | Eight studies on Juice Plus have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Three were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trials. Most of the studies were funded and co-written by the manufacturer. To date, the products that have been examined in all of the studies were Garden Blend and Orchard Blend (2 capsules of each taken daily in most of the studies), with the exception of one study on Vineyard Blend taken in combination with Garden and Orchard Blend (Plotnick et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1744-9), and one study on Juice Plus Gummies (Stewart et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1652-7). | ||
| == Criticisms == | |||
| While NSA maintains that the published studies establish the efficacy of Juice Plus, other sources have argued that the research is flawed and that claims made about the product have been overly vague, misleading, or innacurate. In 2003, Dr. Bernhard Watzl and Dr. Achim Bub of the Federal Research Centre for Nutrition in Karlsruhe, Germany, published a critical commentary in response to a Juice Plus study by Dr. Samir Samman and colleagues (J Nutr 2003; 133:2188-93), claiming that Juice Plus contained at least 4 nutrients (beta-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E, and folate) that were added to the plant powders to restore nutrients lost during processing. This claim was acknowledged by Dr. Samman in a published reply (J Nutr. 2003;133:3726.), and it suggested that any of the potential benefits of Juice Plus could be attributed to the spiked nutrients rather than to those that may have been present in the original plant sources. Similarly, Dr. Jane Freedman of Boston University School of Medicine published a critical commentary (J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1750-2) regarding a Juice Plus study by Dr. Gary Plotnick and associates (Ibid; p. 1744–9), which raised concerns about the reliability of that study's results and conclusions. | |||
| Several of the studies on Juice Plus showed poor results with regard to (a) the content and absorption of several key nutrients and antioxidants, (b) antioxidant effects, and (c) effects on homocysteine, LDL, and cholesterol levels. Other studies are in progress but have not been published. | |||
| A 2003 placebo-controlled study Dr. R.J. Stewart and colleagues (J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1652-7) from the University of Utah, showed that vitamin-fortified Juice Plus Gummie candies did not significantly improve the antioxidant status of subjects, according to the results of 6 different antioxidant tests. The authors stated “It is possible that the supplement did not contain enough of the proper antioxidants to make a significant difference or that the antioxidants extracted in the fruit/vegetable extract were not biologically available”. They also showed that the product consisted mainly of 2 ingredients: corn syrup (85%) and beef gelatin (10%). | |||
| Critics also claim that much of the scientific basis for Juice Plus is argued solely per an ''ad verecundiam'' argument; a logical fallacy which states that since an authority or journal has done a study involving Juice Plus, then all marketing claims must be true. | |||
| '''Product Claims and Counterclaims''' | |||
| Claim: ''Juice Plus is “the” simple, convenient, and inexpensive way to add more nutrition from fruits and vegetables to the diet.'' | |||
| Counterclaim: Some critics have stated that Juice Plus is more expensive (as well as less effective) than simply purchasing a sufficient amount of fruits and vegetables. | |||
| Claim: ''Juice Plus is “the next best thing to eating fruits and vegetables”.'' | |||
| Counterclaim: According to Consumer Reports, the Better Business Bureau's National Advertising Division said in April 2005 that NSA advertising featuring Dr. William Sears misleadingly implied that Juice Plus Gummies are low in sugar and are a nutritional alternative to fruits and vegetables. NSA had allegedly promised to modify its ads and stop calling Gummies “the next best thing to fruits and vegetables”, but continues to use this claim to describe Juice Plus on the product website. | |||
| Claim: ''Juice Plus contains a far wider variety of naturally occurring vitamins and minerals than traditional vitamin supplements, and also the antioxidants/phytonutrients and fiber found in fresh, raw fruits and vegetables.'' | |||
| Counterclaim: There is no evidence to support the claim that Juice Plus contains a far wider variety of naturally occurring vitamins and minerals than traditional vitamin supplements, or a significant number or amount of the antioxidants, phytonutrients, and fiber found in fresh, raw fruits and vegetables. The product label indicates that Juice Plus contains certified amounts of only 6 nutrients and very small amounts of fiber (less than 1 g). | |||
| Claim: ''Four daily Juice Plus capsules provide the vitamin C of four oranges'' | |||
| Counterclaim: The daily regimen of 2 Garden Blend capsules (containing a total of 42 mg vitamin C) and 2 Orchard Blend capsules (containing 150 mg total) provides 192 mg of vitamin C. According to the USDA Agricultural Research Service 4 oranges contain, depending on the variety, anywhere from 235 mg to 331 mg (average of 279 mg) vitamin C; corresponding to 22% to 72% (average 47%) more than 4 Juice Plus capsules. | |||
| == External links == | == External links == | ||
| Line 33: | Line 59: | ||
| * Consumer complaints with the Better Business Bureau's National Advertising Division regarding misleading Juice Plus testimonial advertisements featuring Dr. William Sears. | * Consumer complaints with the Better Business Bureau's National Advertising Division regarding misleading Juice Plus testimonial advertisements featuring Dr. William Sears. | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | |||
Revision as of 13:02, 6 June 2006
Juice Plus+® is a branded line of nutritional supplements containing powdered fruit or vegetable juice extracts fortified with added nutrients. Juice Plus is manufactured by Natural Alternatives International (NAI; San Marcos, CA) and is distributed by National Safety Associates (NSA; Collierville, TN) only through direct or multi-level marketing. Several versions of the product are marketed including Orchard Blend capsules (containing unknown amounts of powdered fruit juice extracts) and Garden Blend capsules (containing unkown amounts of powdered vegetable juice extracts), chewable and gummy candy supplements for children, and a version for dogs and cats.
Product Labeling
The Juice Plus Garden Blend bottle label contains the following information. The recommended daily serving size is 2 capsules (750 g each), which contain the following nutrients (as percentages of the U.S. recommended daily intake: vitamin A (as beta-carotene) 140%, calcium 4%, vitamin E 80%, vitamin C 70%, iron 2%, and folate 70%. A 2-capsule serving contains no fat or cholesterol, 10 mg sodium, 1 g carbohydrate, and less than 1 g each of fiber and protein. The ingredients listed in descending order of amount (exact amounts not listed) are: vegetable juice powder and pulp from carrots, parsley, beets, kale, broccoli, cabbage, spinach, and tomato; gelatin, lipase, amylase, protease, cellulase, beet fiber, barley bran, oat bran, cabbage fiber, glucomannan, plant cellulose, dried plant fiber, Lactobacillus acidophillus, vegetable-derived magnesium stearate, anthrocyanins, allicin, lycopene, polyphenol catechins, Dunaliella salina (algae), and indole carbinols.
The Juice Plus Orchard Blend bottle label contains the following information. The recommended daily serving size is 2 capsules (750 g each), which contain the following nutrients (as percentages of the U.S. recommended daily intake): vitamin A (as beta-carotene) 110%, calcium 2%, vitamin E 70%, vitamin C 320%, iron 2%, and folate 35%. A 2-capsule serving contains no fat or cholesterol, 5 mg sodium, 1 g carbohydrate (less than 1 g each of dietary fiber and sugars), and less than 1 g protein. The ingredients listed in descending order of amount (exact amounts not listed) are: fruit juice powder and pulp from apple, orange, pineapple, cranberry, peach, acerola cherry, and papaya; gelatin, bromelain, papain, lipase, amylase, protease, and cellulase; apple pectin, cirus pectin, date fiber, prune powder, glucomannan, citrus bioflavenoids, dried plant fiber, Lactobacillus acidophillus, vegetable-derived magnesium stearate, anthrocyanins, polyphenol catechins, Dunaliella salina (algae), and indole carbinols.
Two capsules per day of each of these products (4 capsules in total) constitute the usual daily regimen.
Research
Eight studies on Juice Plus have been published in peer-reviewed journals. Three were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled trials. Most of the studies were funded and co-written by the manufacturer. To date, the products that have been examined in all of the studies were Garden Blend and Orchard Blend (2 capsules of each taken daily in most of the studies), with the exception of one study on Vineyard Blend taken in combination with Garden and Orchard Blend (Plotnick et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1744-9), and one study on Juice Plus Gummies (Stewart et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1652-7).
Criticisms
While NSA maintains that the published studies establish the efficacy of Juice Plus, other sources have argued that the research is flawed and that claims made about the product have been overly vague, misleading, or innacurate. In 2003, Dr. Bernhard Watzl and Dr. Achim Bub of the Federal Research Centre for Nutrition in Karlsruhe, Germany, published a critical commentary in response to a Juice Plus study by Dr. Samir Samman and colleagues (J Nutr 2003; 133:2188-93), claiming that Juice Plus contained at least 4 nutrients (beta-carotene, vitamin C, vitamin E, and folate) that were added to the plant powders to restore nutrients lost during processing. This claim was acknowledged by Dr. Samman in a published reply (J Nutr. 2003;133:3726.), and it suggested that any of the potential benefits of Juice Plus could be attributed to the spiked nutrients rather than to those that may have been present in the original plant sources. Similarly, Dr. Jane Freedman of Boston University School of Medicine published a critical commentary (J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1750-2) regarding a Juice Plus study by Dr. Gary Plotnick and associates (Ibid; p. 1744–9), which raised concerns about the reliability of that study's results and conclusions.
Several of the studies on Juice Plus showed poor results with regard to (a) the content and absorption of several key nutrients and antioxidants, (b) antioxidant effects, and (c) effects on homocysteine, LDL, and cholesterol levels. Other studies are in progress but have not been published.
A 2003 placebo-controlled study Dr. R.J. Stewart and colleagues (J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102:1652-7) from the University of Utah, showed that vitamin-fortified Juice Plus Gummie candies did not significantly improve the antioxidant status of subjects, according to the results of 6 different antioxidant tests. The authors stated “It is possible that the supplement did not contain enough of the proper antioxidants to make a significant difference or that the antioxidants extracted in the fruit/vegetable extract were not biologically available”. They also showed that the product consisted mainly of 2 ingredients: corn syrup (85%) and beef gelatin (10%).
Critics also claim that much of the scientific basis for Juice Plus is argued solely per an ad verecundiam argument; a logical fallacy which states that since an authority or journal has done a study involving Juice Plus, then all marketing claims must be true.
Product Claims and Counterclaims
Claim: Juice Plus is “the” simple, convenient, and inexpensive way to add more nutrition from fruits and vegetables to the diet.
Counterclaim: Some critics have stated that Juice Plus is more expensive (as well as less effective) than simply purchasing a sufficient amount of fruits and vegetables.
Claim: Juice Plus is “the next best thing to eating fruits and vegetables”.
Counterclaim: According to Consumer Reports, the Better Business Bureau's National Advertising Division said in April 2005 that NSA advertising featuring Dr. William Sears misleadingly implied that Juice Plus Gummies are low in sugar and are a nutritional alternative to fruits and vegetables. NSA had allegedly promised to modify its ads and stop calling Gummies “the next best thing to fruits and vegetables”, but continues to use this claim to describe Juice Plus on the product website.
Claim: Juice Plus contains a far wider variety of naturally occurring vitamins and minerals than traditional vitamin supplements, and also the antioxidants/phytonutrients and fiber found in fresh, raw fruits and vegetables.
Counterclaim: There is no evidence to support the claim that Juice Plus contains a far wider variety of naturally occurring vitamins and minerals than traditional vitamin supplements, or a significant number or amount of the antioxidants, phytonutrients, and fiber found in fresh, raw fruits and vegetables. The product label indicates that Juice Plus contains certified amounts of only 6 nutrients and very small amounts of fiber (less than 1 g).
Claim: Four daily Juice Plus capsules provide the vitamin C of four oranges
Counterclaim: The daily regimen of 2 Garden Blend capsules (containing a total of 42 mg vitamin C) and 2 Orchard Blend capsules (containing 150 mg total) provides 192 mg of vitamin C. According to the USDA Agricultural Research Service Nutrient Data Laboratory 4 oranges contain, depending on the variety, anywhere from 235 mg to 331 mg (average of 279 mg) vitamin C; corresponding to 22% to 72% (average 47%) more than 4 Juice Plus capsules.
External links
Product Homepage
- Juice Plus+® homepage Provides product promtional information and excerpted research abstracts.
Full-text Research Available Online
- Effect of supplemental phytonutrients on impairment of the flow-mediated brachial artery vasoactivity after a single high-fat meal. Company sponsored research.
- A mixed fruit and vegetable concentrate increases plasma antioxidant vitamins and folate and lowers plasma homocysteine in men. Company sponsored research.
Critical Commentary in Peer-Reviewed Journals
- Fruit and vegetable concentrate or vitamin supplement? A critique of Juice Plus research by Dr. Bernhard Watzl and Dr. Achim Bub of the Federal Research Centre for Nutrition, Karlsruhe, Germany.
- High-fat diets and cardiovascular disease. Are nutritional supplements useful? A critique of Plotnick et al (2003) by Dr. Jane Freedman, Boston University School of Medicine
Other Critical Commentary
- Juice Plus: A Critical Look Commentary by Dr. Stephen Barrett of Quackwatch
- A critique of Juice Plus from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
- Juiced Up and Dried Out A critique by the University of California Berkeley
- Juice Plus—and minus Additional critique by the University of California Berkeley
- Consumer Reports: How product testimonials bend the rules (Jan 2006) Consumer complaints with the Better Business Bureau's National Advertising Division regarding misleading Juice Plus testimonial advertisements featuring Dr. William Sears.