| Revision as of 11:03, 10 September 2013 editDoctorKubla (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users25,937 edits Adding Template:Nonnotable content. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:00, 10 September 2013 edit undoYnhockey (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators66,999 edits →Template:Nonnotable content: reNext edit → | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| :{{Tfd links|Nonnotable content}} | :{{Tfd links|Nonnotable content}} | ||
| This template directly contradicts ]. It's transcluded in four articles, all of which would be better served by a template like {{tl|overly detailed}}. ] (]) 11:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | This template directly contradicts ]. It's transcluded in four articles, all of which would be better served by a template like {{tl|overly detailed}}. ] (]) 11:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :*'''Keep'''—I proposed creating such a template, and then created it, more than a year ago, and it met with no opposition whatsoever. I even waited more than a year after posting at the talk of ] to see if there would be any problems with it, and no one raised any. It is therefore strange that it comes up now. However, to the point: it doesn't contradict the notability guideline. The guideline just points out that you can include content inside an article that you wouldn't be able to have as a separate article. It does not say that you can add any information you want as long as it's inside an article (that, indeed, would be a contradiction of the ] policy). The current template talks about clearly excessive and/or unencyclopedic content inside of articles, and indeed in certain cases it can overlap with {{tl|overly detailed}}. This is no reason to delete it, but if it is not clear what the template is about, we can work together to make it more clear. —] <sup>(])</sup> 12:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| ==== ] ==== | ==== ] ==== | ||
| :{{Tfd links|Governments of Turkey}} | :{{Tfd links|Governments of Turkey}} | ||
Revision as of 12:00, 10 September 2013
| < September 9 | September 11 > |
|---|
September 10
Template:Nonnotable content
This template directly contradicts WP:N#Notability guidelines do not limit content within an article. It's transcluded in four articles, all of which would be better served by a template like {{overly detailed}}. DoctorKubla (talk) 11:03, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Keep—I proposed creating such a template, and then created it, more than a year ago, and it met with no opposition whatsoever. I even waited more than a year after posting at the talk of WP:TC to see if there would be any problems with it, and no one raised any. It is therefore strange that it comes up now. However, to the point: it doesn't contradict the notability guideline. The guideline just points out that you can include content inside an article that you wouldn't be able to have as a separate article. It does not say that you can add any information you want as long as it's inside an article (that, indeed, would be a contradiction of the WP:NOT policy). The current template talks about clearly excessive and/or unencyclopedic content inside of articles, and indeed in certain cases it can overlap with {{overly detailed}}. This is no reason to delete it, but if it is not clear what the template is about, we can work together to make it more clear. —Ynhockey 12:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Governments of Turkey
Delete. Orphan, less informative, and redundant to Template:Cabinets of Turkey Ithinkicahn (talk) 08:12, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- delete per nom. — Lfdder (talk) 09:47, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
- Comment There were well over 50 links to this template. But the proposer removed all links to leave the template orphan and now claims that the template is orphan. This behavior clearly contradicts with the forth pilar of WP. It would be much more wikilike if he'd take time to discuss the issue before removing everything.Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Metro Line
- Template:Metro Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Delete. Metro Line, currently the only article using this template, already lists all the stations, and provides links to all the articles linked to in this template. 117Avenue (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2013 (UTC)