Misplaced Pages

User talk:Renren8123: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:11, 7 September 2013 editSrich32977 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers299,591 edits Notice: Misidentifying edits as vandalism on Objectivism (Ayn Rand). (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 23:51, 10 September 2013 edit undoMilesMoney (talk | contribs)3,474 edits September 2013Next edit →
Line 10: Line 10:
== September 2013 == == September 2013 ==
] Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as ], such as the edit at ], are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can ]. Please read ] for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-notvand --> – ] (]) 14:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC) ] Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as ], such as the edit at ], are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can ]. Please read ] for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-notvand --> – ] (]) 14:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

:Renren, you've been warned before to stop making false accusations of vandalism. What do we need to do, block you? ] (]) 23:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:51, 10 September 2013

Mistakes on Objectivism (Ayn Rand)

You've been making some mistaken edits to this article, and I'd like you to stop. First, you've twice reverted a change without explanation, ignoring the fact that it included a high-quality supporting source and comes from a parallel change in the parent article. Second, you've marked your revert as minor both times, which amounts to insulting me by accusing me of vandalism. If you have an opinion, you're welcome to join the discussion. But until you, don't edit that page again. MilesMoney (talk) 03:20, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Objectivism (Ayn Rand). Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. A similar message has been posted on the talk page of the other editor.S. Rich (talk) 05:37, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Information icon Thank you for trying to keep Misplaced Pages free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Objectivism (Ayn Rand), are not considered vandalism under Misplaced Pages policy. Misplaced Pages has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Misplaced Pages:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 14:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Renren, you've been warned before to stop making false accusations of vandalism. What do we need to do, block you? MilesMoney (talk) 23:51, 10 September 2013 (UTC)