Revision as of 21:02, 12 September 2013 editVanished user 7b1215e7ef746ac20682e3dbe03f5b84 (talk | contribs)12,887 edits →Could this now be a Start?← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:50, 13 September 2013 edit undoVanished user 7b1215e7ef746ac20682e3dbe03f5b84 (talk | contribs)12,887 edits changed to start, unless there is an objection, article now has history and building details, as well as owner historyNext edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class= |
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=Start|importance=Low}} | ||
{{WikiProject United States|class= |
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=|WV=Yes|WV-importance=Low}} | ||
== Could this now be a Start? == | == Could this now be a Start? == |
Revision as of 14:50, 13 September 2013
National Register of Historic Places Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
United States: West Virginia Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Could this now be a Start?
Open for any and all discussionCoal town guy (talk) 14:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
- I dunno. It seems to be a bunch of semi-unrelated facts strung together; I expect more cohesion in a start-class article. Also, I'm bothered by the amount of direct quotations. --Orlady (talk) 03:27, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- I used the direct quotes from Jim Wood, the only person who bothered to write a history of Raleigh County WV, so in a sense, I wanted to provide authentic data, in other words, what did Alfred Beckley say about his own house. I agree about the organization part, and would be open to any and all suggestions. I tried to keep the purchase and original property name in the history sectionCoal town guy (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Just rewrote the article again, this time I think the flow is betterCoal town guy (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the flow is better, but I think it's still a stub because it still tells the reader very little about the house. The National Register nom is less informative than the typical NRHP nom, but it has a lot of basic information that I didn't find here. --Orlady (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- I have read the nom form in detail and beliecve it or not been to the house on a tour. The only other features, I could see wree those you would find in a real estate ad, fireplaces, exposed wooden beams, plans are to restore the house to its original form, which, I have had some fun with, they want to use clap board as Beckley did, but some other historians and I have discussed this and many want the log cabin, not the clap board. I will look and update some of the physical features.Coal town guy (talk) 21:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the flow is better, but I think it's still a stub because it still tells the reader very little about the house. The National Register nom is less informative than the typical NRHP nom, but it has a lot of basic information that I didn't find here. --Orlady (talk) 19:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Just rewrote the article again, this time I think the flow is betterCoal town guy (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- I used the direct quotes from Jim Wood, the only person who bothered to write a history of Raleigh County WV, so in a sense, I wanted to provide authentic data, in other words, what did Alfred Beckley say about his own house. I agree about the organization part, and would be open to any and all suggestions. I tried to keep the purchase and original property name in the history sectionCoal town guy (talk) 12:39, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- Low-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- Start-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class United States articles
- Unknown-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Unknown-importance
- Start-Class West Virginia articles
- Low-importance West Virginia articles
- WikiProject West Virginia articles
- WikiProject United States articles