Misplaced Pages

Talk:Eads School Gymnasium: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:17, 16 September 2013 editVanished user 7b1215e7ef746ac20682e3dbe03f5b84 (talk | contribs)12,887 edits OKEY DOKEY, it has barely 4 sentences, and we want to call it a start??← Previous edit Revision as of 19:30, 16 September 2013 edit undoDoncram (talk | contribs)203,830 edits replyNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=stub|ts=20130905155030|reviewer=MatthewVanitas}} {{WikiProject Articles for creation|class=start|ts=20130905155030|reviewer=MatthewVanitas}}
{{WikiProject Colorado|class=stub|importance=low}} {{WikiProject Colorado|class=start|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject NRHP|class=stub|importance=low}} {{WikiProject NRHP|class=stub|importance=low}}


Line 9: Line 9:
:I returned the AFC rating to Start. I believe it is not proper to change that from the AFC member's evaluation. Whatever, otherwise. --]]] 17:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC) :I returned the AFC rating to Start. I believe it is not proper to change that from the AFC member's evaluation. Whatever, otherwise. --]]] 17:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
::There is no rule or law stating that. Its a stub. Its barely 4 sentences......really?] (]) 17:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC) ::There is no rule or law stating that. Its a stub. Its barely 4 sentences......really?] (]) 17:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

:::It's a rating by a named AFC reviewer. You should not change their rating. I don't care what rating for Wikiproject NRHP, am leaving that different. --]]] 19:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:30, 16 September 2013

WikiProject iconArticles for creation Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted on 5 September 2013 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).
WikiProject iconUnited States: Colorado Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
???This article has not yet received a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to create, improve, and update Misplaced Pages articles about the U.S. State of Colorado.
To comment about this article, select the Add topic tab above.
For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WHY was this rated a START???

I changed the articles rating to that of a Stub. It was rated a start. I ask, why? Honestly, it restates a NRHP nom form. It barely crosses the threashold of being a dictionary definition of the place. In fact, you could probably, go to that place, strike up a conversation with a local person and they would know as much if not more than what is in the current article. IMO, thats a stub. I checked oin the Wiki rankings of articles, turnes out, WP:ASSESS pretty much spells it out. WHY do I care. Using this as a metric, lets just go along and assume its a Start. Add a pic. Well now we have a pic, of the building, WOW! I am now bolt upright, jaw agape, THIS MUST BE A CLASS A or FA NOW. How about another ref? WOO HOO! Its a FA now. 3 refs...EGAD, the HAND OF GOD must be a new ranking. The entire paradigm of human knowledge has now been transformed as we now know it. BECAUSE, we have a pic, 3 sentences, and 2+ refs...UH...NOCoal town guy (talk) 17:18, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

I returned the AFC rating to Start. I believe it is not proper to change that from the AFC member's evaluation. Whatever, otherwise. --doncram 17:05, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
There is no rule or law stating that. Its a stub. Its barely 4 sentences......really?Coal town guy (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
It's a rating by a named AFC reviewer. You should not change their rating. I don't care what rating for Wikiproject NRHP, am leaving that different. --doncram 19:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Categories: