| Revision as of 02:21, 20 September 2013 editCallanecc (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators72,962 edits →Archives: Reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:35, 21 September 2013 edit undoSarower Sigh Bhati (talk | contribs)33 edits →Request for Arbitration for unresolved dispute : Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
| Could there be a word or two distinguishing WT:RFAR archives (2004-2009) from Various archives (2004-2011) and Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009-)? It's especially unclear what "Various archives" refers to and it's unclear where to look for an older request. <font face="Rage Italic" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 18:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC) | Could there be a word or two distinguishing WT:RFAR archives (2004-2009) from Various archives (2004-2011) and Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009-)? It's especially unclear what "Various archives" refers to and it's unclear where to look for an older request. <font face="Rage Italic" size="4" color="#800080">]</font> <sup><font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400">] ]</font></sup> 18:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :Another way of saying various archives is random archives search at own peril, they are mainly collections of archives from various places including during the transition from ''Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration'' to ''Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests'. What sort of older request are you after? The ] has links to accepted cases, motions and declined case requests. ''']''' (] • ] • ]) 02:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC) | :Another way of saying various archives is random archives search at own peril, they are mainly collections of archives from various places including during the transition from ''Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration'' to ''Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests'. What sort of older request are you after? The ] has links to accepted cases, motions and declined case requests. ''']''' (] • ] • ]) 02:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Request for Arbitration for unresolved dispute : Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati == | |||
| Respected Sir i never with drew from the dispute resolution filed by me. I only mentioned i have no stamina left to bear insults and degrading of the subject. I demand justice Sir. Further instead of giving justice the people involved in the dispute had started Vendetta. All sections of talk page has gone to archives. Further they have started raising new issues against the subject after that dispute, which they them self accepted initially. I invite you to visit the article Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati for same The dispute filed by me was "Talk page of the article "Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati", Talk page of the editors themselves in discussion about the subject of the article, NeilN, Yunshui, Ihardlythinkso, Myself, Subject." I beg you and feel sorry if any language of mine was considered as with drawing of dispute. Regards] (]) 07:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:35, 21 September 2013
| Misplaced Pages:Resolving disputes contains the official policy on dispute resolution for English Misplaced Pages. Arbitration is generally the last step for user conduct-related disputes that cannot be resolved through discussion on noticeboards or by asking the community its opinion on the matter.
This page is the central location for discussing the various requests for arbitration processes. Requesting that a case be taken up here isn't likely to help you, but editors active in the dispute resolution community should be able to assist. Please click here to file an arbitration case • Please click here for a guide to arbitration | Shortcuts |
| Arbitration talk page archives |
|---|
| WT:RFAR archives (2004–2009) |
| Various archives (2004–2011) |
| Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009–) |
| WT:RFAR subpages |
| Archive of prior proceedings |
Discretionary sanctions review
Since March 2013, various individual members of the Arbitration Committee have been reviewing the existing Discretionary sanctions process, with a view to (i) simplifying its operation and (ii) updating its procedures to reflect various clarification and amendment requests. An updated draft of the procedure is available for scrutiny and discussion here. Roger Davies 07:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions review
(This is a repeat of an earlier notice.) Since March 2013, various individual members of the Arbitration Committee have been reviewing the existing Discretionary sanctions process, with a view to (i) simplifying its operation and (ii) updating its procedures to reflect various clarification and amendment requests. An updated draft of the procedure is available for scrutiny and discussion here. AGK 16:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Archives
Could there be a word or two distinguishing WT:RFAR archives (2004-2009) from Various archives (2004-2011) and Ongoing WT:A/R archives (2009-)? It's especially unclear what "Various archives" refers to and it's unclear where to look for an older request. Liz 18:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
- Another way of saying various archives is random archives search at own peril, they are mainly collections of archives from various places including during the transition from Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration to Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests'. What sort of older request are you after? The Arbitration Index has links to accepted cases, motions and declined case requests. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:21, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Request for Arbitration for unresolved dispute : Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati
Respected Sir i never with drew from the dispute resolution filed by me. I only mentioned i have no stamina left to bear insults and degrading of the subject. I demand justice Sir. Further instead of giving justice the people involved in the dispute had started Vendetta. All sections of talk page has gone to archives. Further they have started raising new issues against the subject after that dispute, which they them self accepted initially. I invite you to visit the article Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati for same The dispute filed by me was "Talk page of the article "Hridayeshwar Singh Bhati", Talk page of the editors themselves in discussion about the subject of the article, NeilN, Yunshui, Ihardlythinkso, Myself, Subject." I beg you and feel sorry if any language of mine was considered as with drawing of dispute. RegardsSarower Sigh Bhati (talk) 07:35, 21 September 2013 (UTC)