Revision as of 18:49, 29 August 2013 editRasputinAXP (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,921 edits →Lehigh university talk page: concerns over your behavior← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:42, 22 September 2013 edit undoAmericanDad86 (talk | contribs)11,637 edits →Lehigh university talk page: concerns over your behaviorNext edit → | ||
Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
:I asked a question, I didn't state. I was an Administrator, you don't need to quote chapter and verse at me. If you thought you were being attacked, then you don't know what being attacked is. Your ] additions to the article are as overwrought as your comment here. Kindly pound sand. ] 18:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC) | :I asked a question, I didn't state. I was an Administrator, you don't need to quote chapter and verse at me. If you thought you were being attacked, then you don't know what being attacked is. Your ] additions to the article are as overwrought as your comment here. Kindly pound sand. ] 18:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
::Shut up! You're not an admin anymore so shut up! Stop making a pest out of yourself, stop bringing up past adminships to pass off that you're above the rules, cut the crap, and contribute respectably otherwise get the hell off Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 19:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:42, 22 September 2013
The Very Secret Diaries
Back in 2005, you participated in an AFD discussion this article. It was kept, but I have renominated it for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Very Secret Diaries (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 01:24, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for filing this investigation. It was nice having some outside eyes looking at the issue. Regards, P. D. Cook 05:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Alpha Chi Rho
The article Alpha Chi Rho has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- non notable, unreferenced
While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WuhWuzDat 22:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Request for comment
This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Misplaced Pages:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Misplaced Pages policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Misplaced Pages talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:02, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:New Jersey state colleges
Template:New Jersey state colleges has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Courtesy informing you because you were the original contributor. It has been superseded by Template:Colleges and universities in New Jersey. 67.83.96.145 (talk) 21:36, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Redirect for Timbuktu
Hi RasputinAXP. I recently wanted to create a redirect "Timbaktu" for the above-mentioned article. I find that there was an article by this name and it was deleted previously (by you). Is it OK to create a redirect by that name?-MW 06:15, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- I haven't been an admin in a very long time. I think there was some band that called themselves that and I deleted it. I don't see any reason you can't. RasputinAXP 11:46, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks. When I opened the new article creation page for that name, I found a message that I should contact you before creating the page. Hence the question. Regards :-)MW 12:03, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Undeletion
Hi RasputinAXP,
It would be nice if we could undelete the page for Rune Linding (http://en.wikipedia.org/Rune_Linding). Could you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.60.1.46 (talk) 21:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Nope. I'm not an admin anymore. Sorry. RasputinAXP 05:08, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:NJ2012-LicensePlate-NJD.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NJ2012-LicensePlate-NJD.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:NJ2012-LicensePlate-PHI-Flyers.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:NJ2012-LicensePlate-PHI-Flyers.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Notice of change
Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Lehigh university talk page: concerns over your behavior
I'm just writing to you to express my concerns about your behavior at the Lehigh University talk page. In providing your input on the topic under debate in that discussion, you have made several personal remarks about me. This started when you suggested that there was a direct relation between me and the individuals upon which I was editing about, as shown here . I warned you that your remarks were assuming bad faith and were personal in nature because they related to me as opposed to the content of the article. This is against talk page policies. You would then follow this up by continuing to relate the discussion to me by uncivilly bringing up stuff about my retirement notice here at Misplaced Pages in a discussion in which this is entirely irrelevant, as shown here . I am now choosing to address your behavior here as your remarks don't belong at that talk page and will merely throw off the focus of that debate. So, here at Misplaced Pages, policy states that commentary that focuses on users and not the content DOES NOT belong on article talk pages. Policies state that discussion is to be content-focused on article talk pages. I have copy and pasted these policies for you below so that you are aware:
Misplaced Pages:Avoid personal remarks states "The purpose of talk pages is to discuss how to improve articles. If you have opinions about the contributions others have made, feel free to discuss those contributions on any relevant talk page. But if you have opinions about other contributors as people, they don't belong there – or frankly, anywhere on Misplaced Pages."
WP:No personal attacks states "As a matter of polite and effective discourse, comments should not be personalized. That is, they should be directed at content and actions rather than people. In disputes, the word "you" should be avoided when possible."
WP:What is a personal attack states "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence. Serious accusations require serious evidence. Evidence often takes the form of diffs and links presented on wiki."AmericanDad86 (talk) 15:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- I asked a question, I didn't state. I was an Administrator, you don't need to quote chapter and verse at me. If you thought you were being attacked, then you don't know what being attacked is. Your WP:UNDUE additions to the article are as overwrought as your comment here. Kindly pound sand. RasputinAXP 18:49, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Shut up! You're not an admin anymore so shut up! Stop making a pest out of yourself, stop bringing up past adminships to pass off that you're above the rules, cut the crap, and contribute respectably otherwise get the hell off Misplaced Pages. AmericanDad86 (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)