| Revision as of 02:57, 8 September 2013 editJohnny Squeaky (talk | contribs)2,359 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:11, 25 September 2013 edit undoDoniago (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers113,244 edits Please use edit summaries. Thanks!Next edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| If you look at the edit history of the article, you'll see that IPs have been changing the individual's name to "David", despite the source clearly identifying him as "Donald". The ref and note were added to the name specifically to avoid this happening in the future, as I alluded to in my edit summary, which I assume you didn't read. The ref is necessary because, apparently, people using Visual Editor don't get to see the not. Please don't remove the ref again, unless you want to take responsibility for changing the name back each time it's changed so the article complies with ]. --] (]) 18:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | If you look at the edit history of the article, you'll see that IPs have been changing the individual's name to "David", despite the source clearly identifying him as "Donald". The ref and note were added to the name specifically to avoid this happening in the future, as I alluded to in my edit summary, which I assume you didn't read. The ref is necessary because, apparently, people using Visual Editor don't get to see the not. Please don't remove the ref again, unless you want to take responsibility for changing the name back each time it's changed so the article complies with ]. --] (]) 18:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :I read your edit summary. It's still a dupe. If people are vandalizing the article, there are ways of dealing with that. Peppering the article with duplicate references isn't one of them. =//= ] 18:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)] | :I read your edit summary. It's still a dupe. If people are vandalizing the article, there are ways of dealing with that. Peppering the article with duplicate references isn't one of them. =//= ] 18:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)] | ||
| <!--Template:IAV!--> | |||
| == September 2013 == | |||
| ] Thank you for ] to ]. I noticed your recent edit to ] does not have an ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> -- ] (]) 13:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:11, 25 September 2013
Please note that I do not respond to uncivilized threats from admins or other editors... =//= Johnny Squeaky 00:48, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Amish Mafia
If you look at the edit history of the article, you'll see that IPs have been changing the individual's name to "David", despite the source clearly identifying him as "Donald". The ref and note were added to the name specifically to avoid this happening in the future, as I alluded to in my edit summary, which I assume you didn't read. The ref is necessary because, apparently, people using Visual Editor don't get to see the not. Please don't remove the ref again, unless you want to take responsibility for changing the name back each time it's changed so the article complies with WP:V. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
- I read your edit summary. It's still a dupe. If people are vandalizing the article, there are ways of dealing with that. Peppering the article with duplicate references isn't one of them. =//= Johnny Squeaky 18:45, 17 August 2013 (UTC)]
September 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. I noticed your recent edit to Soylent Green does not have an edit summary. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)