| Revision as of 06:15, 28 September 2013 editThibbs (talk | contribs)28,090 edits ←Created page with '==September 2013== Please stop the reversion games. As I told you before, you must add actual citations for your claims or ...' | Revision as of 15:03, 28 September 2013 edit undoArmbrust (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers325,789 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Patriotic Nigras. (Twinkle)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==September 2013== | ==September 2013== | ||
| Please stop the reversion games. ], you must add actual citations for your claims or else they will be removed. The ones you are currently using are false. Your claims cover a period between 2012 and 2013 but the sources are from 2008 and 2009. How is that possible? Clearly your sources are being used falsely here. If you can't back up your claims then they will be removed. See ]. -] (]) 06:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | Please stop the reversion games. ], you must add actual citations for your claims or else they will be removed. The ones you are currently using are false. Your claims cover a period between 2012 and 2013 but the sources are from 2008 and 2009. How is that possible? Clearly your sources are being used falsely here. If you can't back up your claims then they will be removed. See ]. -] (]) 06:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. | |||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <sup>]</sup> 15:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 15:03, 28 September 2013
September 2013
Please stop the reversion games. As I told you before, you must add actual citations for your claims or else they will be removed. The ones you are currently using are false. Your claims cover a period between 2012 and 2013 but the sources are from 2008 and 2009. How is that possible? Clearly your sources are being used falsely here. If you can't back up your claims then they will be removed. See WP:V. -Thibbs (talk) 06:15, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Patriotic Nigras shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Armbrust 15:03, 28 September 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.