Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:04, 29 September 2013

delete my page

April 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. + Crashdoom 08:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Are you the same person as User talk:Phaedrx? This edit suggests that you and he/she are the same person.--Toddy1 (talk) 07:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

This is old news, I have been regularly contributing to Misplaced Pages for the last few days, check those logs too if you want to be fair...April 26, April 25, April 24, going back to the point where it was first explained to me by Yngvadottir (Rihan) on April 22 in the chat room for which I have screenshotted all the logs. The last edit made was to remove the AFD from Dennis Donaghy which I added in the first place out of a misunderstanding of how these things work and have been working here well before little old me got here. I am making good contributions and have a lot more that I have self-assigned (please see Phaedrx user page for more details). If you want to chase me off etc. you're going to miss out on some good copy editing, reference citation additions, data verification and correction, and overall enhancement of the accuracy and readability/presentation of this great Encyclopedia. --Phaedrx (talk) 15:13, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Please assume good faith. If I had wanted to "chase you off", I would have made a sock puppet investigations report. Please could you amend Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Quantonics which has postings under both the IP ID and the Phaedrx ID, giving the impression that there are two of you.--Toddy1 (talk) 17:03, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

I don't know how to do that. I'm going to take the page as now and simply replace all instances of the formerly used IP-username with the current contributor username --Phaedrx (talk) 18:06, 27 April 2013 (UTC).

Your edits to Dennis Donaghy

Hello, I'm My name is not dave. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Dennis Donaghy, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. namenot (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 11:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, you may be blocked from editing. namenot (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 11:44, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edits to Dennis Donaghy

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Dennis Donaghy. namenot (talk/contribs) (formerly Insulam Simia) 11:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Dennis Donaghy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Jianhui67 Talk 11:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

--Yngvadottir (talk) 12:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

That was one or two too many reverts. (You also should not be editing logged out.) The AfD will decide what happens to the article - blanking it and putting messages in it won't help anything, it will just attract vandal patrollers. And as we have explained to you before, you can't withdraw your work. Now please, cool your jets for a day. You can of course e-mail me, and I'll be looking at IRC once I get home from work. --Yngvadottir (talk) 12:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

108.227.134.169 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=you pieces of shit suck my fat dick fuck you to hell assholes |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=you pieces of shit suck my fat dick fuck you to hell assholes |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=you pieces of shit suck my fat dick fuck you to hell assholes |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

• Requests for unblock