| Revision as of 19:29, 12 August 2013 editFactual Proof (talk | contribs)416 edits →Chennai Express box office.: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:46, 1 October 2013 edit undoKbplus2008 (talk | contribs)30 edits →Your response to my edition of your page on SONI RAZDAN.: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| I would appreciate any input you have in an almost certainly sockpuppet led nuisance relating to the acknowledgement of sources other than Box Office India for ], despite us having a consensus for several years that uses BOI only (which has maintained uniformity for so long). Please see the talk page when you can, thanks. ] (]) 19:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC) | I would appreciate any input you have in an almost certainly sockpuppet led nuisance relating to the acknowledgement of sources other than Box Office India for ], despite us having a consensus for several years that uses BOI only (which has maintained uniformity for so long). Please see the talk page when you can, thanks. ] (]) 19:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Your response to my edition of your page on SONI RAZDAN. == | |||
| Dear Mr Zeeyanketu, | |||
| You have replied back to me in response to my edition of your page on bollywood actress "Soni Razdan", stating that my contribution on your page wasn't found constructive by you ! I am very surprised at your reaction and also would like you to know that this is the first time when any person has described any of my contribution in the field of literature as "non-constructive". I am not very proud about myself but am quite confident that whatever i type or blog on any topic is aimed at being "informative" and highly constructive. | |||
| If by chance you felt that my contribution on soni razdaan article of yours is not constructive, then it can be due to the double-standards you would be adopting whilst reading an article written by you and that written by someone else. You might be always rating your effort SUPERIOR to others and hence your sick mind must have led you to believe that the contribution made by others should be kicked out instead of being welcomed. I pity your state of mind really. | |||
Revision as of 16:46, 1 October 2013
Redirect to:
Outside wiki
How can I contact you? Probably on Facebook or Twitter?
Arjann (talk) 12:20, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
dont vandalise
dont vandalise the article remember your own school days a book with out picture is boring to read if u really want your nations article to be boring lacking picture of your nation then fine delete all picture at once and the revert you are making to older edit just check who made those edit then make a revert show some national pride — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sushilkumarmishra (talk • contribs) 20:33, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
dont revert b4 going thru it
unless and untill u do thru it and the REFERANCES which are attached dont revert it cuz i consider it as vandalism of a NEUTRAL article, so go thru the changes and compare with other article of same type then revert it and if u are keen to have your nations article pictureless and lifeless then fine remove the remaining picture and make it even duller Sushilkumarmishra (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Dabangg 2 poster
Bro dont change my last edit. The old poster kind of sucks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hx96772 (talk • contribs) 19:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
reverting posters ?
Hey,
I dont get why you keep reverting my edits, I'm actually putting up better posters for these films. Whats the problem ?
Hx96772 (talk) 06:14, 11 April 2013 (UTC) HX96772
You incorrectly reverted my edit
I recently made a small edit to Token Economy to fix some of the grammar and you reverted it. Apparently some automated tool thought it was vandalism? If you could reinstate my edit, that would be helpful. 128.211.209.119 (talk) 22:15, 19 April 2013 (UTC)
shootout at wadala
sorry sir but what are you talking about? i already quoted my changes with links on youtube videos. everyone knows that characters names were changed because of some reasons. there is also a text about it in that page and in the youtube videos the filmmakers wrote down the new character names. so tell me where am i wrong?
Unleashed tiger (talk) 11:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
aah ok. now i got it! sorry for the misunderstanding and thank you for the information. i never worked in wikipedia i think thats why i did some mistakes. thanks again and have a nice day!
Unleashed tiger (talk) 17:07, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank You
Hey Rahul
Thanks for clearing the clouds!
Regards
Sohambanerjee1998 talk 16:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
hi
Hi ,
I already gave the message regarding my edit to qwyrxian so please wait until he discuss and reply . please don't undo my changes until that .
--Suryavarman01 (talk) 06:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Chennai Express box office.
Hi,
I would appreciate any input you have in an almost certainly sockpuppet led nuisance relating to the acknowledgement of sources other than Box Office India for Chennai Express, despite us having a consensus for several years that uses BOI only (which has maintained uniformity for so long). Please see the talk page when you can, thanks. Factual Proof (talk) 19:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
Your response to my edition of your page on SONI RAZDAN.
Dear Mr Zeeyanketu, You have replied back to me in response to my edition of your page on bollywood actress "Soni Razdan", stating that my contribution on your page wasn't found constructive by you ! I am very surprised at your reaction and also would like you to know that this is the first time when any person has described any of my contribution in the field of literature as "non-constructive". I am not very proud about myself but am quite confident that whatever i type or blog on any topic is aimed at being "informative" and highly constructive. If by chance you felt that my contribution on soni razdaan article of yours is not constructive, then it can be due to the double-standards you would be adopting whilst reading an article written by you and that written by someone else. You might be always rating your effort SUPERIOR to others and hence your sick mind must have led you to believe that the contribution made by others should be kicked out instead of being welcomed. I pity your state of mind really.