| Revision as of 18:28, 8 June 2006 editEVula (talk | contribs)39,066 edits Strong keep← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:47, 8 June 2006 edit undoJustinpwilsonadvocate (talk | contribs)214 edits strong deleteNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| * '''Delete''' rumors do not belong on WP —''']]]'''<small><sup>]</sup></small> 15:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | * '''Delete''' rumors do not belong on WP —''']]]'''<small><sup>]</sup></small> 15:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Keep''' There is evidence that the sequel is at ''some'' level of production; it may have been postponed while he works on the musical version of ''Young Frankenstein'', but that doesn't mean that the project is completely dead. ] 18:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | *'''Strong Keep''' There is evidence that the sequel is at ''some'' level of production; it may have been postponed while he works on the musical version of ''Young Frankenstein'', but that doesn't mean that the project is completely dead. ] 18:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strong Delete''' As correctly asserted above, this article violates Misplaced Pages's crystal ball guidelines, and also does not provide sufficient verifiability. ] 18:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:47, 8 June 2006
Spaceballs 2
Crystal ball. This movie is nowhere near far enough along to be definite. Ace of Sevens 07:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete because. Danny Lilithborne 08:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete. This article violates Misplaced Pages's crystal ball guidelines, and also does not provide sufficient verifiability. — Mike • 11:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete total cystal ballism. It's basically an article that consists of two things mel brooks has been reported as been doing. Not films existance isint exactly the most verifable of things. Ydam 12:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. I don't see any crystal balling, as all the stuff on the page is taken from its sources. As for if the movie is far enough along to be definite, that can't be said. Mel Brooks has been keeping very tight lipped about the whole thing, which suggest that he has something. If SB2 wasn't coming out, he would have said as much. JQF 12:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Comment that is all speculation on your part though. It's not verfiable Ydam 12:46, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete All the content is taken from other sources, but they're pretty much rumor mills. Fan1967 13:01, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Besides the title's incorrect it SHOULD be "Spaceballs 2: The Search for More Money" Wildthing61476 13:37, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Delete rumors do not belong on WP —Mets501 15:43, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep There is evidence that the sequel is at some level of production; it may have been postponed while he works on the musical version of Young Frankenstein, but that doesn't mean that the project is completely dead. EVula 18:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Delete As correctly asserted above, this article violates Misplaced Pages's crystal ball guidelines, and also does not provide sufficient verifiability. Justinpwilsonadvocate 18:47, 8 June 2006 (UTC)