| Revision as of 16:35, 13 October 2013 editVaulter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers20,662 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:37, 13 October 2013 edit undoSrich32977 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers299,521 edits Warning: Edit warring on United States v. Manning. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <small>]-]</small> 16:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC) | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] <small>]-]</small> 16:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> | |||
| Please be particularly aware, ] states: | |||
| # '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> ''You have now done 4 reverts in 24 hours. (And saying editors are living in fantasy land does not excuse your edit warring.)'' – ] (]) 16:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:37, 13 October 2013
Welcome to Misplaced Pages!
|
Mario Gotze
Hi Steve, I edited Marcio Gomez because he plays for the German Tigers football team.
- I moved this talk away from my userpage. Also I think you may be confused about whose page you had edited. You editted Mario Gotze not this Marcio Gomez person you are currently talking about.IrishStephen (talk) 04:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
Abdullah Jalghoom Research on Quran
Please help us in contesting the deletion to the article Abdullah Jalghoom research on Quran.Book memorizer (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Giovanni Battista Guadagnini, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Typos.
There was no need to say I am ironic just because I pressed the wrong butten on a keyboard. I personly thought it was quite rude how you said it.--The Cosmos Master (talk) 21:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Hot Stop talk-contribs 16:35, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on United States v. Manning. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You have now done 4 reverts in 24 hours. (And saying editors are living in fantasy land does not excuse your edit warring.) – S. Rich (talk) 16:37, 13 October 2013 (UTC)