| Revision as of 18:15, 15 October 2013 editParadoctor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,206 edits General note: Unconstructive editing on Zeno's paradoxes. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:38, 16 October 2013 edit undoTkuvho (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers9,424 edits →Likely block: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| == October 2013 == | == October 2013 == | ||
| ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of ] to ] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ''Stop .'' ] (]) 18:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | ] Hello, I'm ]. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of ] to ] because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the ]. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on ]. Thanks!<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ''Stop .'' ] (]) 18:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Likely block == | |||
| Your editing at ] is disruptive and will result in a block unless you stop reintroducing the material in question; see ]. ] (]) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:38, 16 October 2013
July 2008
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Earl Dodge, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Suva Чего? 21:45, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Sons of Confederate Veterans
Smokedoctor, I certainly don't want to get into an edit war, but the information added in the article Sons of Confederate Veterans, about the abolitionist viewpoint seems highly irrelevant in this article, and most certainly in the spot placed in the article. Shouldn't an unnamed abolitionist's view of what did or did not cause the Civil War be better placed in the article, American Civil War? And if it is relevent in the SCV article, couldn't we find a better way to word the statement and incorporate it into the article? The statement itself just seems to be hanging out on a limb by itself and seems to interrupt the smooth reading flow of that part of the article. Sf46 (talk) 21:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
October 2013
Hello, I'm Paradoctor. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Zeno's paradoxes because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Stop this nonsense. Paradoctor (talk) 18:15, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Likely block
Your editing at Zeno paradox is disruptive and will result in a block unless you stop reintroducing the material in question; see WP:3R. Tkuvho (talk) 16:38, 16 October 2013 (UTC)