| Revision as of 00:48, 2 November 2013 editVanishedUser sdu8asdasd (talk | contribs)31,778 edits →Note: You know full well that's not the issue at hand. Go away.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:53, 2 November 2013 edit undoPantherLeapord (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,357 edits →Some stroopwafels for you!: new WikiLove messageNext edit → | ||
| Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
| |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' only finished one out of the fifteen races it competed in?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | |text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that the ''']''' only finished one out of the fifteen races it competed in?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page <small>(], )</small> and it will be added to ] if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the ]. | ||
| }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | }}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (] '''·''' ]) 00:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Some stroopwafels for you! == | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Sorry that you had to put up with their behaviour. ]|]|] 00:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 00:53, 2 November 2013
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
|
| This is VanishedUser sdu8asdasd's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
A cup of tea for you!
|
With compliments! Mootros (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks, what is this for? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:40, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
Request for comment
As you previously participated in related discussions you are invited to comment at the discussion at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC for AfC reviewer permission criteria. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:08, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Ford G7
Hello! Your submission of Ford G7 at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —David Eppstein (talk) 01:44, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Batmobile
Jeg2357 (talk) 02:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Hi Luke, I'm sorry my edit seemed like advertising. I didn't mean it to sound like, or imply, advertising or for promotional purposes. I haven't built or sold a BatRod in over 10 years. I was just kinda tooting my own horn. The link I provided was just for the pictures. I have no affiliation with anybody at or with that website. Jim Jeg2357 (talk) 02:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, because you have built and sold BatRods, then I'm afraid you shouldn't be adding in the information. Besides, the addition was poorly sourced (please read WP:V and WP:RS; blogspot sources should not be used) and there was no evidence of the BatRod being notable in any way. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi
"Obvious trolling?" I was just trying to end that section by expressing how ridiculous it would be if Hasteur really was correct. Sry for misunderstanding DontClickMeName talk 19:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Which is pretty clearly an attempt at trolling... I disagree entirely with Hasteur's position as well, but that was just unnecessary. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- Wouldn't trolling be a low level of argument? I was trying to destroy the accusation. I probably shouldn't have made a joke of it, though DontClickMeName talk 22:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- does this work then? DontClickMeName talk 00:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Apart from the fact that I'm either "Luke" or "Lukeno94", yes, that's much better. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 09:40, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- does this work then? DontClickMeName talk 00:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- Wouldn't trolling be a low level of argument? I was trying to destroy the accusation. I probably shouldn't have made a joke of it, though DontClickMeName talk 22:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
It's hard to remember your number!
Thanks for your first revert, you probably kept me out of a mess. I think you have a nice integrity--even when you disagreed with Hasteur, you still knew it was plainly harmful for me to make a laugh out of his opinions on the matter (which were serious input).
You also knew not to shy off when I said "I was just trying to end that section by expressing how ridiculous it would be if Hasteur really was correct. Sry for misunderstanding" ... It was very wrong how I worded that sentence: I talked as if I fully expected you to agree with my behavior, and made it look like you couldn't possibly disapprove it unless you didn't get the sarcasm. That's terrible--I swear it wasn't conscious, but maybe my learned automatic behavior...
I did, in fact, hope you merely didn't understand my sarcasm, but it was my nasty bias that made me behave as if I fully expected the hope to be true.
Misplaced Pages needs more people like you... DontClickMeName talk 03:58, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
- I could read it as being sarcastic, and I could read it as being serious. The main thing is you've realized that there is a time and a place for those sorts of comments - and that wasn't in that discussion. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 07:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Atlético Limeño article
Lukeno94, I see what you mean about the Atlético Limeño article, but I can't say it is more helpful to show information which is outdated, incorrect or no information at all.
DYK for Ford G7
 | On 1 November 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ford G7, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Ford G7 only finished one out of the fifteen races it competed in? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ford G7. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
|
Sorry that you had to put up with their behaviour. PantherLeapord|My talk page|My CSD log 00:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC) |