| Revision as of 10:10, 12 November 2013 editChimpu420 (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:14, 12 November 2013 edit undoChimpu420 (talk | contribs)33 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| <ref name=reflist1>{{cite web|title=India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12534127|publisher=BBC|accessdate=12 November 2013|archivedate=22 February 2011}}</ref> | <ref name=reflist1>{{cite web|title=India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-south-asia-12534127|publisher=BBC|accessdate=12 November 2013|archivedate=22 February 2011}}</ref> | ||
| ==Notes== | |||
| {{reflist1}} | |||
Revision as of 10:14, 12 November 2013
Re: Your edits on Persecution of Muslims
Hello, I have noticed that you have undone two edits by an IP. I notice that this IP was trying to make the tone of the article formal and neutral. I am here to discuss about the article and how we can compromise to make appropriate edits to the article to avoid edit warring. Thanks. Darylgolden 06:47, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello Darylgolden,I made those changes few hours ago,but i think the editing done earlier was correct.You can't probably tell what the nature of attack was especially if it happened in the 18th century.So i guess i'll have no troubles undoing my own changes. Chimpu420 (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Notes
- "India Godhra train blaze verdict: 31 convicted". BBC. Retrieved 12 November 2013.
{{cite web}}:|archive-date=requires|archive-url=(help)